I'm fed up with Uncle Sam's tyranny!

redmarlin3 said:The whole "but Mom, everyone else was doing it too!" excuse just doesn't fly.

hm.. alright then, if you say so.🙄

silverjackal said:What makes this thread nonsensical?? I'm just asking—not looking for a fight, just genuinely curious what was missing from the topic. If it was that bad, why didn't you just nuked it immediately? You even jumped in and posted a few times yourself. If you’d given it a little more breathing room, I bet it would have actually gone somewhere..

No worries, let's break it down...

So, the title: "How to indirectly test if a guy would (hypothetically) marry a girl who performs oral sex on him..." is fine by me. No issues there.

Then she goes off about how absurd the male brain is regarding this topic and invites everyone to dive deep... okay... but then at the end of the first post, she asks, "How many women lose their partner's respect by catering to his every whim?"...😕...see, that's a completely different conversation right there. Basically, the title and the actual post don't line up because they're tackling two totally separate questions. So, either we split this into two distinct threads, or we stick to the original premise without all the extra baggage...

Look, I let it slide for a bit because maybe the OP just struggled to word things, so I didn't want to hit the delete button instantly. I figured we might be able to narrow the focus in a few posts... only to end up with this: "it's just absurd that one thing is for a wife and another for a mistress... as if one woman can't handle both roles... true, being a mistress is way easier than being a wife..."

Now I'm asking you all... what "mistress" are we talking about here? Is she talking about the role of a housewife versus a lover, or is she talking about having a mistress on the side? And how does any of that connect back to the TITLE... Tell me again how that makes sense to you... or is this just people siding with her because they think I'm picking on her as a mod?

I gave it a few posts because I thought there was a point to it, but the author ended up providing headers for three different, unrelated topics. Either that, or she had a thought but just phrased it poorly. Alright, we're closing this one; feel free to start three separate threads for those specific points and we'll go from there...

Hopefully that clears things up... I really don't care who started the thread, I only care about whether the content actually holds water...

Daniel Ward87