CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Pregnant or not?

Pregnant or not?

Started by coastalviper17 · · 👁 6 views · 24 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants coastalviper17Douglas Green31Carol Baker17Drew ScottRobin Myerswiredjackal63Robert Sanchez4Jerry Booth10
Douglas Green31 Douglas Green31 Member
36 messages
joined Apr 2008
#21 ·
Robin Myers said:Cheap tests might fail if they miss a pregnancy, but once they show a positive, there's no debating it.

Exactly. They detect hormones that shouldn't even be in your urine unless you're pregnant, since those are produced by the placenta—unless we're talking about rare tumors.
coastalviper17 coastalviper17 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Apr 2008
#22 ·
Look, I hear what you're saying, but do we really think a uterus would just swell up for no reason? Like, come on. Could there be something else going on here? Besides, if it’s an issue, that’s exactly why you go to a gynecologist in the first place—to get answers, right? If they didn't find something, they wouldn't have flagged it...
Douglas Green31 Douglas Green31 Member
36 messages
joined Apr 2008
#23 ·
coastalviper17 said:That might be true, but would an enlarged uterus happen for no reason? Could it be something else? A doctor wouldn't have even checked if there wasn't something going on...

Look, I'm not a doctor.
We're just guessing here, which is why I told you to retake the test and get a second opinion from your OBGYN.
It’s entirely possible it's caused by something else.

The negative test is the weird part—it's possible she's pregnant, especially since some women on these forums mention testing negative even into their second trimester.
But that's rare, and drawing conclusions based on other people's stories is nothing but guesswork.
Robin Myers Robin Myers Member
29 messages
joined Apr 2008
#24 ·
Even if the swelling is caused by something else, I don't see how that could be considered trivial. In any case, I'm leaving it in the hands of the doctors, since they're actually the experts in this field...
Jerry Booth10 Jerry Booth10 Member
36 messages
joined May 2008
#25 ·
Honestly, I find it completely baffling that a doctor can't provide a definitive answer on whether she’s pregnant or not. If he only performed a physical exam, that’s hardly sufficient to make such a call—even if the uterus feels enlarged upon palpation. On the other hand, if he actually ran an ultrasound, there should have been something visible beyond just an enlarged uterus. In my own experience, my period was only a few days late, yet the moment I had an ultrasound, there was a tiny little dot right there—about the size of these smiley face emojis over here. That was the embryo. It was clear. Based on that tiny speck and the fact that my cycle was only three days off, my doctor concluded I was about two or three weeks along. By that logic, this girl should have definitely seen something on her scan too. Furthermore, the doctor failed to clarify his actual process: did he just rely on manual palpation, or did he actually perform an ultrasound?😕

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads