CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Forum Help! › Where is the line between helpful sharing and spamming?

Where is the line between helpful sharing and spamming?

Started by shadowcobra14 · · 👁 4 views · 10 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants shadowcobra14Taylor Gonzalez79Tyler Thomas12Charles Ramirez59Lisa Rodriguez84Jose Miller3hollowtrucker77
shadowcobra14 shadowcobra14 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Apr 2008
#1 ·
Hey everyone,

I'm looking for some honest takes on this:

The forum rules say no advertising—which I totally get—but I’m wondering where we actually draw the line? Like, when does someone just sharing their genuine thoughts or experiences with a product, a service, or a specific company cross over into "advertising" territory that gets flagged by the mods?

Personally, I've come here dozens of times to research stuff—and honestly, I've actually bought things based on what people recommend here! So, is that all considered spam, or is it actually okay under the rules?

I really feel like there should be a crystal clear boundary for everyone. If advertising is strictly off-limits, then shouldn't we just avoid mentioning brand names or companies altogether?
Taylor Gonzalez79 Taylor Gonzalez79 Active Member
78 messages
joined May 2008
#2 ·
Look, if you aren't on some corporate payroll for whatever you’re hyping up—and if there isn't some hidden kickback involved—then I don't see the problem. To me, that’s just an honest consumer opinion and a genuine recommendation... not a paid advertisement, at least by my logic.🤷
Tyler Thomas12 Tyler Thomas12 Active Member
70 messages
joined Jul 2003
#3 ·
A quick heads-up for the admins and supermods.Here’s the link to the controversial thread:
Taylor Gonzalez79 Taylor Gonzalez79 Active Member
78 messages
joined May 2008
#4 ·
What’s actually going on here?😁
Charles Ramirez59 Charles Ramirez59 Active Member
218 messages
joined Jan 2005
#5 ·
I’d be right there with you on scrubbing links and names. I'm fully behind the moderators on this one.

It’s hard to draw a perfect line; it usually comes down to who’s posting and the tone they use. Of course, we can't know for certain if someone is secretly representing a corporation, but we try our best to stay fair when deciding what stays and what goes.
Lisa Rodriguez84 Lisa Rodriguez84 Active Member
175 messages
joined Jul 2006
#6 ·
Look, take the internet for granted, right? On his three sub-forums, you’ll constantly see threads popping up with links to other sites, but nobody calls that spamming because the whole point is discussing how to redesign forums or portals or whatever. But if some random guy shows up with, what, three posts under his belt and drops a thread saying, "Hey, a new forum just launched—come over and sign up," then yeah, that’s blatant advertising.
Taylor Gonzalez79 Taylor Gonzalez79 Active Member
78 messages
joined May 2008
#7 ·
Bradley Barnes90 said:Look, take the internet as an example—say, on those big sites like Reddit or specialized niche forums. You often see threads posted with links to other boards, but nobody calls that spamming or advertising because the whole point of the thread is to discuss layout, UX, or how to improve the site itself... it's a discussion. But if some random guy with maybe three posts shows up and starts a thread titled "New Forum Alert—come sign up now!", then yeah, that's blatant self-promotion.

I don't see what any of this has to do with intentional—or even unintentional—product propaganda.😕
Jose Miller3 Jose Miller3 Regular
446 messages
joined Mar 2024
#8 ·
Most veteran mods can just "smell" this kind of stuff from a mile away. Honestly, when I first clicked on that thread, my immediate thought was—wait, is this actually the school owner trying to sneak in an ad? 😁

The fact that everyone else caught on later just proves we were, well, totally spot on... 🙂

There isn't some official rulebook for this, but even the mods (and honestly, most regular users too) definitely had their red flags going up on those specific threads and posts.
Tyler Thomas12 Tyler Thomas12 Active Member
70 messages
joined Jul 2003
#9 ·
I’m not exactly the fastest at making calls where someone might get unfairly accused twice, so I took a moment to think this through.

The original post was actually the very first thing this new user ever posted, and it included a link.

Look, I have nothing against people chatting or swapping stories on threads about specific products or services—whatever. But once I deleted the disputed link, there was absolutely nothing left in the post. It became a useless shell, which effectively made the whole thread pointless. If people want to debate it, they can do so in a new, relevant thread, which is exactly what I told the user via PM.
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#10 ·
went and took a look
if this were happening on my neck of the woods, I’d probably be handing out a permanent ban just for the blatant advertising
shadowcobra14 shadowcobra14 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Apr 2008
#11 ·
Thanks so much for jumping into this discussion and sharing your thoughts—I really appreciate it. I totally get why my post seemed a bit sketchy from your point of view, but honestly, there was zero bad intent behind it—(though, hey, if I mention how much I love the school during my next meeting with the principal, maybe they'll give me a discount on tuition 😉). Anyway, catch you all in the next thread...🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads