#1 ·
Good day,
I wish to express my profound astonishment regarding the fact that my access to this Reddit community has been restricted for seven days due to an alleged insult toward another user. Since I am unable to review the specific entry in question, I will clarify that it involved labeling a foul fascist as a foul fascist, and a pathetic racist as a pathetic racist. Such descriptors were merely a direct reaction to the fascist and racist outbursts of said individual, who, quite remarkably, has faced no repercussions despite repeatedly insulting everyone participating in the "Global Affairs" sub-forum and openly characterizing a third of the world's population as "sub-civilized scavengers." In essence, I was simply diagnosing the political consciousness of a fellow user rather than engaging in what is being termed "harsh insults toward members," a behavior for which I am certainly not known.
Given my prior understanding that the super-moderator responsible for my ban is guided more by rigid discipline than by actual intelligence or sound judgment, I would kindly request that an administrator explain the criteria used here and why they have been applied so selectively.
I wish to express my profound astonishment regarding the fact that my access to this Reddit community has been restricted for seven days due to an alleged insult toward another user. Since I am unable to review the specific entry in question, I will clarify that it involved labeling a foul fascist as a foul fascist, and a pathetic racist as a pathetic racist. Such descriptors were merely a direct reaction to the fascist and racist outbursts of said individual, who, quite remarkably, has faced no repercussions despite repeatedly insulting everyone participating in the "Global Affairs" sub-forum and openly characterizing a third of the world's population as "sub-civilized scavengers." In essence, I was simply diagnosing the political consciousness of a fellow user rather than engaging in what is being termed "harsh insults toward members," a behavior for which I am certainly not known.
Given my prior understanding that the super-moderator responsible for my ban is guided more by rigid discipline than by actual intelligence or sound judgment, I would kindly request that an administrator explain the criteria used here and why they have been applied so selectively.