CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Sudden death

Sudden death

Started by Amy Jackson2 · · 👁 4 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Amy Jackson2hiddensailor14Lawrence Wellshiddenscout362Sam Hall15Charles Edwards8Casey Cook10Susan MoralesBrandon Wells712mistywalker46Alexander LewisDaniel Ortiz15analogbison13Sam Kim12
Amy Jackson2 Amy Jackson2 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Apr 2006
#1 ·
My mother passed away quite suddenly recently. She was only 52 years old. I was wondering if anyone here knows more about this specific phenomenon as a cause of death.
I’m living in Sweden, so please bear with me if my phrasing comes across a bit off.
Initially, the doctors suspected a stroke or perhaps a cerebral embolism, but after the autopsy, they determined it was actually an arrhythmia—essentially, a single electrical impulse just failed to fire correctly.
It happened so fast, everyone... she was gone within ten minutes at most. It started with some pain in her neck area, then she collapsed onto the bed and began to lose consciousness. The paramedics arrived within ten minutes, but by then, she had already stopped breathing. They managed to resuscitate her briefly, but from that moment on, her heart simply wouldn't stabilize. They fought for fifty minutes, but nothing worked.

Thank you.
hiddensailor14 hiddensailor14 Active Member
150 messages
joined Apr 2024
#2 ·
Amy Jackson2 said:My mom passed away very suddenly recently. She was only 52. I was wondering if anyone here knows more about this specific phenomenon as a cause of death.
I'm living in Sweden right now, so please excuse me if I get any of the terminology wrong.
At first, they thought it was a stroke or some kind of brain clot, but after the autopsy, they determined it was actually an arrhythmia. It was as if a single electrical impulse just skipped a beat.
Honestly, it all happened within ten minutes at most. First, she felt some pain in her neck area, then she collapsed onto the bed and started losing consciousness. The paramedics arrived within ten minutes, but she had already stopped breathing by then. They managed to resuscitate her, but from that point on, her heart just wouldn't stabilize. They tried for fifty minutes, but nothing worked.

Thank you.

I am so sorry for your loss.
Did she have any history of heart issues? Had she ever had an EKG done? It’s possible it could be WPW...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolff-P...White_syndrome
Lawrence Wells Lawrence Wells Regular
312 messages
joined Jun 2006
#3 ·
Tell me—did your mother have any heart issues?
hiddenscout362 hiddenscout362 Active Member
111 messages
joined Apr 2007
#4 ·
I'm so sorry 😢

A close friend of mine passed away in his sleep. It's just devastating...👎
Amy Jackson2 Amy Jackson2 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Apr 2006
#5 ·
Mom wasn't a heart patient. Her blood pressure was always perfectly fine—usually sitting right at 120/70, maybe hitting 140/80 on a bad day at most.
Lately, she had just been feeling more fatigued, dealing with frequent headaches. But none of us could have possibly imagined there might be something wrong with her heart. I know it’s not uncommon to see athletes suddenly collapse and pass away during a workout or right after they finish training... and it almost always turns out to be some underlying cardiac issue.
So many people get a second chance, but Mom didn't even come close to that. There are a thousand questions left behind—why? How? But I suspect we'll probably never find the answers...
Sam Hall15 Sam Hall15 Active Member
225 messages
joined May 2006
#6 ·
I am so sorry for the loss of your mother.
You're absolutely right that getting definitive answers is incredibly difficult, especially after a sudden cardiac arrest. It's nearly impossible to pinpoint the exact cause through an autopsy alone because, as those doctors wisely suggested, it was likely an arrhythmia triggered by a million different things—like Prinzmetal angina, which doesn't leave any physical markers for an autopsy to find.
Did you happen to see the autopsy report? I'm wondering what they said about the condition of her coronary arteries. Was she a smoker? This might sound like a cliché question, but had she been facing any major stressors lately? Or perhaps there was an underlying metabolic issue? An electrolyte imbalance could also be a factor, such as if she had experienced any bouts of vomiting or diarrhea, or even a more subtle metabolic disruption that led to such an imbalance. Was she taking any medications?
Charles Edwards8 Charles Edwards8 Member
46 messages
joined Feb 2007
#7 ·
So sorry for your loss, Amy Jackson2

To really get to the bottom of this, we’d need an autopsy report. If you managed to get your hands on one, then we could actually dig into the details.
But based on the symptoms described, it looks like a myocardial infarction. Sadly, that's the most likely culprit for such a sudden passing, though I’ll say it again—without an official autopsy, it's all just guesswork.

You can't definitively prove it was an arrhythmia through a post-mortem, but any scarring on the myocardium would point toward a heart attack (which, of course, could have been triggered by an arrhythmia).

There's also the possibility of a pulmonary embolism, but honestly, nothing is certain until we see those autopsy findings.
Amy Jackson2 Amy Jackson2 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Apr 2006
#8 ·
Thanks for all the input.
I haven't received the autopsy report yet. I’m honestly not even sure if they provide those here, but I am definitely going to push for it. We already had such a hard time just getting them to tell us what the initial cause was in the first place. The pathologist who performed the exam was on vacation, and the other one was out sick. It was a total mess. And once we finally learned it wasn't a stroke but actually her heart, their explanations were far too vague for me to really wrap my head around...
As you all pointed out, there could be several different factors at play here.
Mom hadn't smoked for the last 20 years, though she did back when she was younger. As for her cholesterol, they mentioned some minor changes, but nothing out of the ordinary for someone her age. Stress was definitely a factor; I think she tended to internalize things rather than showing how much she was actually feeling. But as for how much that contributed to this, I just don't know.
Regarding that metabolic imbalance—about a month before this happened, back in February, our whole family caught some kind of virus. We were all dealing with vomiting, nausea, and just general weakness.
The only thing I can potentially link to this is the headaches she’d been having over the last two weeks, but even then, the doctors suggested it might have just been a coincidence.
When it happened to Mom, Dad was right there with her, and he said she grabbed her neck because of the pain. Could that have been a sudden spike
in blood pressure right at that moment?
I don't know. We have a thousand questions, and we’re going to have to go back and talk to the people who handled the autopsy in person, because trying to make sense of any of this over the phone is nearly impossible.
Charles Edwards8 Charles Edwards8 Member
46 messages
joined Feb 2007
#9 ·
I'm not an expert on Swedish law, but you absolutely have to get your hands on that autopsy report before anyone can really talk sense about this.
If you ask me, my best guess is it was a myocardial infarction—basically a heart attack—where the pain can shoot up right into your neck.
Plus, let's be real, pathologists sometimes skip a deep dive into the brain, so there's always a chance they missed something crucial there too.
Sam Hall15 Sam Hall15 Active Member
225 messages
joined May 2006
#10 ·
Pathologists typically won't perform a cranial autopsy if they identify the cause of death elsewhere, most often within the heart...
But you mentioned in your initial post that you were told the autopsy findings didn't suggest a myocardial infarction that could be immediately identified during the procedure... So, I'm struggling to follow that theory regarding a heart attack; if they didn't indicate it was cardiac-related right after the autopsy, it's unlikely they would change that conclusion in the final report.
Casey Cook10 Casey Cook10 Active Member
77 messages
joined May 2024
#11 ·
Look, I'm sorry, but a clinical autopsy follows a very specific process and set of rules, and they have to open up the head for everyone regardless of what actually caused the death. Whether a pathologist is being sloppy or just dealing with some unexpected complications is really a whole different conversation. An autopsy has its own strict protocol to follow.
And in this particular case, you also have to account for the aortic dissection where the blood leaks into the vessels above the aorta...
Sam Hall15 Sam Hall15 Active Member
225 messages
joined May 2006
#12 ·
hm....I don't want to overstep since I'm no expert on medical protocols, but I did witness an autopsy once where the pathologist mentioned they wouldn't open the skull if the cause of death was clearly identified elsewhere. Of course, if there's any suspicion of foul play, everything gets opened, including the head... In this specific case, there was some suspicion, but I've only sat in on two autopsies, and I can't quite recall if they performed a cranial exam for this particular doctor.
Though, if you ask my amateur opinion, the head should always be opened just to be safe.
As for the aortic dissection... hm... based strictly on the information we have available, that’s really all we can say for now.
Susan Morales Susan Morales Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2006
#13 ·
Same here. It happens all the time, and people still love calling it fate.
Amy Jackson2 Amy Jackson2 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Apr 2006
#14 ·
I’ll be sure to post more once we have the autopsy report in hand. Until then, it’s just too difficult for me—or any of us, really—to speculate further.
Perhaps some things simply defy explanation. I used to believe everything could be accounted for... but I was wrong.
Charles Edwards8 Charles Edwards8 Member
46 messages
joined Feb 2007
#15 ·
Every proper autopsy requires opening the skull and doing a deep dive into the brain.
I won't bore you with the gory details—in our world, we just call it "slicing."
Now, let's be real: we don't always go that route, and the reason is pretty simple. If the cause of death is already clear, nobody wants to deal with the hassle of a cranial exam. Plus, doing a full macroscopic analysis of the brain is a massive time sink during an autopsy.
But when it comes to forensic cases? There's zero chance of skipping the head. Everything has to follow strict protocol because, honestly, there are usually "other people" watching the medical staff during those ones.
As for that aortic dissection, I’m thinking it might not actually be what killed them. But hey, I could be wrong—we can speculate all we want, but the bottom line is we have to wait for the official autopsy report.
Brandon Wells712 Brandon Wells712 Member
31 messages
joined Nov 2006
#16 ·
Mark Booth71 said:I feel the same way—it happens quite often, and I still call it fate...


Same here. I'm really sorry 😢.
Amy Jackson2 Amy Jackson2 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Apr 2006
#17 ·
We finally sat down today to talk with the doctor who took over Mom's care in the ER. He mentioned that we won't be getting the official autopsy results back for a little while.
The first thing he told us was that her heart was the culprit—specifically a phenomenon known as
sudden cardiac arrest.
The autopsy didn't turn up anything unusual; there were no visible scars or structural abnormalities. Her brain was perfectly fine, no issues there either. Even the blood vessels looked clear, with no blockages found at all.
He explained that when someone suffers a "typical" heart attack, you can actually see physical scarring on the heart muscle.
I realized I forgot to mention earlier that Mom struggled with sleep apnea... I think that's the right term? It’s when you snore heavily and your breathing just stops periodically during the night. She actually used a CPAP machine to help push air into her lungs whenever those pauses happened.
The doctor suggested that her exhaustion and those headaches might have been linked to oxygen deprivation in her blood, since apparently, those breathing interruptions can drop your oxygen levels down to half of what they should be.
When she first arrived at the hospital, she still had a pulse and, according to the doctor, her skin tone looked "healthy." But she was completely unconscious and wouldn't respond to anything. Her heart rhythm was totally erratic; they tried administering various medications, but it just kept swinging between racing and dragging—it just wouldn't settle into a steady beat.
They even tried to "reset" her heart a few times using the defibrillator, but nothing worked. They fought for about 50 minutes. I believe the medical term is ventricular tachycardia... or something like that... describing that chaotic heart behavior.

So, that's where things stand... perhaps that sleep apnea was the indirect trigger for everything that followed.
mistywalker46 mistywalker46 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Nov 2010
#18 ·
Really feel for you, Lola..😘
Amy Jackson2 Amy Jackson2 NewcomerOP
5 messages
joined Apr 2006
#19 ·
I finally got the paperwork back.

Cause of death: acute heart failure—roughly translated, just sudden cardiac arrest.

Basically, everything else looks fine; all the organs were healthy, no abnormalities, no obvious "errors" found.
Alexander Lewis Alexander Lewis Member
49 messages
joined May 2014
#20 ·
Marilyn Monroe, my dear, I am so incredibly sorry to hear about what happened to your mother.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads