CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Other Sports › Does the World Cup in Alpine disciplines even make sense?

Does the World Cup in Alpine disciplines even make sense?

Started by Nicole Martinez9 · · 👁 5 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nicole Martinez9Lisa Moore7brighttiger6analogmarlin44
Nicole Martinez9 Nicole Martinez9 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Oct 2003
#1 ·
Look, I don’t have anything against the Alpine World Cup, but doesn't it all feel kind of pointless to you guys?
I mean, what’s the point of calling someone a "World Champion" just because they nailed one single slalom run? It feels totally bogus... just a massive hype job.
If people are arguing it's about the money or sponsors or whatever, I don't see any justification there either.
The World Cup is the real deal. To me, the person who wins the World Cup is the actual world champion, not some lucky amateur who caught a break once.
It’s just a cheap way to hijack a prestigious title and devalue the real World Cup races.
Lisa Moore7 Lisa Moore7 Member
35 messages
joined Feb 2007
#2 ·
Man, let's be real, there are sports where specific tournaments actually carry way more weight than the Olympics or the World Cup.
Take skiing, for example—the World Cup is basically the peak.
In soccer, if you set aside club stuff, I’d say the Euros are the top tier.
Track and field? The Olympics rule, but the World Cup is right up there.
Hockey is weird—the Olympics are huge, though the World Cup was pretty weak for a while because of the NHL.
Tennis is all about those individual Grand Slams and the Davis Cup, which honestly feels just as big as a World Cup.
Basketball and volleyball? It's all about the World Cup.
Handball—the Euros take it.

It just varies by sport. Still, even the skiing World Cup hits different...
Nicole Martinez9 Nicole Martinez9 NewcomerOP
7 messages
joined Oct 2003
#3 ·
Spot on.
If you ask me, the World Cup would actually be worth watching if they ran three downs, three slaloms, and so on... Right now, the only reason the World Cup matters is because it gives a shot to athletes from countries that wouldn't stand a chance at the World Cup.
The Champions League is definitely a higher level than the World Cup. I mean, all the absolute best players on the planet are right there.
And don't even get me started on those so-called Super Cup matches where the Champions League winner takes on the UEFA Cup winner just to fight for some meaningless trophy. It’s total nonsense. The whole structure of the UEFA competition already puts those Cup winners in a second-tier European bracket anyway.
Way back in the day, it might have made sense because, hey, maybe the UEFA Cup was actually tougher than the modern Champions League.
brighttiger6 brighttiger6 Member
31 messages
joined Aug 2005
#4 ·
It is essentially the same dynamic as the Olympics... except the Olympics feel like "something bigger." Look, this is just the kind of sport where a single run decides everything. 🙂

The World Cup has been around for a long time now, and I personally enjoy it; there is more genuine excitement involved. :trlja-ruke: 🙂
analogmarlin44 analogmarlin44 Member
17 messages
joined Jan 2007
#5 ·
Of course it makes no sense. It's just a conspiracy theory cooked up by people at the IOC. I don't trust them either... 😳

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads