CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Software › Which antivirus should I use?

Which antivirus should I use?

Started by Jeffrey Martinez4 · · 👁 5 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jeffrey Martinez4crimsongull3gentlepanther32silvermason12Raymond Carter2hollowdriver14Scott Lee7Terry Chase8swiftgull60shadowtiger37silverridge43Andrew Davis2Chloe Hughes2Joseph Chavez7Amy Brooks8Tyler Rivera45Michelle Ward10hollowgull5Matthew Harris2Jerry ThompsonHannah GrayGeorge Baker66Ryan Wilson2Emily Sullivan97 …
Matthew Harris2 Matthew Harris2 Member
47 messages
joined Oct 2009
#21 ·
Avast is actually surprisingly solid as an antivirus, and the best part? It’s completely free for home users.
It offers way more features than the free version of AVG (it even has the latest updates available in Spanish, though there isn't an American version yet). Give it a look. www.avast.com
Jerry Thompson Jerry Thompson Active Member
106 messages
joined Mar 2010
#22 ·
Norton Personal Firewall + Windows Defender + Malwarebytes

That's all anyone really needs. 🙂
Hannah Gray Hannah Gray Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2006
#23 ·
McAfee
George Baker66 George Baker66 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2006
#24 ·
I’ve been looking into this "Venom" situation, and honestly, it feels like we're just circling the drain again. It reminds me of those old tech scares from back in the day when everyone thought their entire system was toast because of one little oversight. I remember sitting in my home office back in the early 2000s, staring at a screen full of alerts, feeling that specific kind of dread you only get when you realize the tools you trusted aren't cutting it. Back then, I thought having Norton Personal Firewall, Windows Defender, and Malwarebytes running simultaneously was an impenetrable fortress. Turns out, nothing is ever truly airtight. The current discourse around this seems to be missing the forest for the trees. People are panicking about the immediate fallout, but if you step back and look at the systemic vulnerabilities being exposed here, it’s much deeper than a single exploit. We see this pattern repeatedly in the US tech sector—a massive vulnerability is identified, a frantic scramble ensues, and then, once the media cycle moves on, we go right back to business as usual until the next disaster hits. It’s exhausting. You try to stay ahead of the curve, keep your patches up to date, and maintain some semblance of digital hygiene, but the landscape shifts so fast it feels like trying to build a house on quicksand. I’m staying cautious, keeping my eyes peeled, and waiting to see how the big players respond. Don't let the hype cycles dictate your level of anxiety; just stay prepared. kaže:
Look, I’m going to say this once: watch your step when you're downloading stuff online. If you stay vigilant, you won't have to deal with any of this nonsense. 😁

Exactly.

I honestly don't bother with antivirus software. In my experience, they’re pretty much overkill. They just sit there eating up system resources and dragging my computer's performance through the mud without actually providing any tangible benefit to me. To make matters worse, they constantly trip over other legitimate programs I'm trying to run, causing all sorts of annoying compatibility headaches.

It feels exactly like hiring a full-time security guard to watch my car. I’m stuck constantly feeding him, paying his wages, and keeping an eye on him, yet the actual utility he provides is almost zero. First off, the odds of anyone even attempting to steal my vehicle are incredibly slim to begin with. But even if someone did decide to go for it, what chance does this guy really have? A smart thief isn't going to make a move while the guard is staring him down; they'll just wait for the exact moment he ducks into the restroom to take their shot. It's a lot of effort for basically no protection.
Ryan Wilson2 Ryan Wilson2 Regular
387 messages
joined Dec 2002
#25 ·
McAfee

It functions exactly as intended.
Scott Lee7 Scott Lee7 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Nov 2008
#26 ·
I think I get what’s going on here. I’ve been running scans with McAfee, everything is configured perfectly for maximum security, yet it comes up completely clean...
Then, I run a scan using a trial version of Kaspersky, and suddenly it flags four different threats...

On top of that, I scanned my neighbor's PC using Kaspersky and found nothing, but when I ran a scan with McAfee, it flagged a Trojan...

Any thoughts on this?
Emily Sullivan97 Emily Sullivan97 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Oct 2009
#27 ·
I use McAfee.
I've been running McAfee for quite a while now and haven't run into any issues.
Everything works fine.
(Though maybe something is eating my PC from the inside out and I just can't see, hear, or feel it)
Joseph Gomez39 Joseph Gomez39 Member
34 messages
joined Aug 2004
#28 ·
Avast for home users is honestly such a solid choice because it’s totally free, always stays up to date, comes with great English support, and doesn't mess with your system at all...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads