rustymoose54 said:So, what? You’d deny someone with hypothyroidism their necessary hormone replacement pills just because they happen to be pills?
Or would you deny a diabetic insulin because, hey, it’s a hormone?
Rachel Cook83 doesn't have a solid diagnosis yet—or maybe she does, but she has no clue. Neither of us knows for sure. So, making claims like "pills will hurt her" or "pills are her only hope" is just pure guesswork at this point.
Well, that was the whole point: the doctor hasn't even given her a diagnosis.
The absolute first step should be finding the actual CAUSE.
And once that's settled, if there are multiple ways to treat a condition, the patient should have a say after the doctor lays out the pros and cons.
Why?
Because it’s HER body.
How could I possibly deny anyone anything?
My point was simple: if you think a doctor isn't competent, go FIND A DIFFERENT DOCTOR. Don't just blindly follow one person—especially when you don't trust them, which seems to be the case with Rachel Cook83 and this physician.
I'd be looking for a second opinion specifically because this doctor didn't explain anything or offer any alternatives.
Pills can be harmful, and if there are other treatment paths that might suit Rachel Cook83 better, she has every right to see all the options and get the full story.
🙄
Let's not be naive here. Most doctors just hand you a prescription and wave you out the door because they rarely have enough time to actually focus on a single patient.
How many times do people get pushed into unnecessary surgeries or prescribed useless meds just because the initial testing was lazy and the diagnosis was wrong?
Unless you're one of the lucky ones who actually landed a great physician, the only way to get decent care is to take matters into your own hands.