CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Cannes Film Festival

Cannes Film Festival

Started by Michelle Howard2 · · 👁 4 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Michelle Howard2Larry Scott5Richard Hernandez13Robert Cooper41driftingowl27AJessica Nguyen85
Michelle Howard2 Michelle Howard2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Dec 2002
#1 ·
So, it all kicked off yesterday, and since this is hands down the best film festival out there for catching stuff actually worth watching, I’ve been digging up some info to share. If you guys have anything good, throw it my way:

On May 15th, they’re running a screening of »The Matrix Reloaded« over at Grauman's Chinese Theatre in Cannes, featuring a gorgeous restoration of Luis Buñuel's »Andalusian Dog« courtesy of the Library of Congress. It’s all part of this special heritage program happening in the Buñuel hall. They’ve got fifteen films lined up—everything from massive classics to those rare gems you never see—with ten of them on 35mm film and five in high-def digital. Some highlights include three films honoring Michael Curtiz, the French animated classic »The King and the Bird« by Paul Grimault, and a restored version of Jerry Schatzberg's »Scary«, which actually snagged the Palme d'Or back in '73. Since last year, the Cannes Film Festival has been doing this annual thing where they pick polished restorations from all over the map—Europe, the US, Asia, you name it. Looking at the lineup suggested by archives, film libraries, studios, and producers, we're talking about hits like Ettore Scola's »We All Loved Each Other So Much«, Richard Brooks' »Cold-blooded«, Jean Renoir's »Marseille«, Mikhail Kalatozov's »Me, Cuba«, and Michael Curtiz's »Robin Hood«. They’re even showing a bunch of documentaries covering legends like Federico Fellini, Charlie Chaplin, Claude Sautet, and Lester James Peries. (Hina)

Here’s a solid link to the official site
Michelle Howard2 Michelle Howard2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Dec 2002
#2 ·
Stay in the loop

Vjesnik 15.5.2003

The honor of kicking off this year's Cannes Film Festival out of competition went to the French adventure flick "Fanfan la Tulipe," directed by Gerard Krawczyk, which opened the festivities this Wednesday evening. But before the glitz and glamour of the premiere, journalists got an early look during a private press screening earlier that morning.
Honestly, though, it didn't exactly set the room on fire; it’s just such a shallow, bloated, and frankly much weaker remake of the classic from fifty years ago. Back in March 1952, the legendary French director and writer Christian-Jaque delivered his iconic black-and-white version of "Fanfan la Tulipe" starring Gerard Philipe and Gina Lollobrigida. That film was a massive hit back then, pulling in over 6.7 million viewers and cementing itself as a total staple of French cinema history.
So, you’d think someone in this modern era would have stepped up to the plate to try and recapture that magic, right? Well, producers Jean Cosmos and Luc Besson—who's a heavy hitter himself as both director and writer, serving here as producer and screenwriter—decided to take the swing. Their take is definitely more cynical, leaning into a contemporary vibe with updated takes on warfare and political shifts, yet they still tried to hold onto that sense of French pride through history and their hero, a man who evolved from a real person into a legend that inspires songs, fairy tales, and, well, movies like this one.
Sadly, even with all their attempts at being witty and playing with modern adventure and action tropes, the filmmakers couldn't quite shake off that stuffy, traditional European period drama feel. It ends up feeling way too long, bogged down by stereotypical dialogue, cliché characters, and a touch of sentimentality that actually does more harm than good to the whole vibe. The real highlights are the bits of irony and cynicism aimed at their own history, which pop up occasionally to flesh out the invincible hero, La Tulipe, and lean into the melodramatic romance between him and the Gypsy girl.
Now, look, Vincent Perez and Penélope Cruz aren't exactly Gerard Philipe and Gina Lollobrigida, but they do a perfectly fine job with what they were given. Perez feels like a sort of modern-day Alain Delon, while Penélope Cruz is basically the hottest star in Europe currently making waves in Hollywood. It’s no shocker that she was the undisputed center of attention at the press conference, getting peppered with questions—not even so much about the movie, but about her, including the big question everyone wanted answered: why wasn't Tom Cruise standing there by her side at the opening? Her answer? Sadly, Tom was tied up finishing filming a samurai epic and couldn't make it, even though he really wanted to.
Starting the festival with a French production doesn't seem to be the winning move, especially since we saw a similar letdown a few years back when the festival opened with "Vatel" starring Gerard Depardie. Despite all the pretension and grandiosity, it looks like the French might struggle to go toe-to-toe with the big-budget American commercial machine, particularly this year, when everyone is already buzzing for the sequel to "The Matrix Reloaded," which is easily the most anticipated event at the festival this Thursday.

Branka Sömen
Michelle Howard2 Michelle Howard2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Dec 2002
#3 ·
We’re keeping the updates rolling from Cannes via Vjesnik, though this time there isn't a single person from our usual forum crowd (like Liberatore) hanging around there

Matrix Mania is absolutely steamrolling everything else in its path

CANNES, May 15th (From Vjesnik's special correspondent) – If you judge things by how this massive global film festival kicked off, then the official lineup is looking pretty grim, because those first two films were nowhere near the prestige or caliber this event demands. "Fanfan la Tulipe" just wasn't what it needed to be, and the very first film in the official competition for the "This Day" awards was even worse than anyone could have anticipated. Raúl Ruiz, that prominent Chilean director based out of Paris, was handed the keys and the cash from Eurimages to whip up this French-Swiss co-production. It’s a convoluted, pretentious, and frankly baffling mess that tries to tackle those age-old questions about madness. I mean, who’s actually crazy—the one everyone says is nuts, the one who believes the hype, or the guy who actually knows what's really going on?!
By cramming a bunch of political intrigue into a family drama with these provocative, almost nonsensical resolutions, Ruiz seemed to get a bit too carried away playing with his own artistic freedom, thinking he could wrap it all up with some grand, flashy gesture.
Since he clearly overplayed his hand, he ended up tripping over his own web of pretension and sky-high expectations. The whole thing collapsed into this messy, disastrous cocktail of political maneuvering, crime drama, psychological studies on insanity, and a total family conspiracy, all centered around some "poor" little socialite caught in a whirlwind of madness, murder, lies, sex, and an uncertain future.
It’s a tough one to recount, even harder to sit through, and nearly impossible to rate as anything other than a total flop, which is definitely not the high-octane start you want at Cannes.
That said, the second day brought a much-needed wake-up call with "The Matrix Reloaded," shown out of competition. It generated so much buzz and attention that it became—perhaps unintentionally—this massive American powerhouse response to all the stuffiness and boredom of European cinema.
True to its name, the film arrived in Cannes just a day before it hits over a thousand theaters across the States, and a week before its big European rollout (including US theaters where this blockbuster is set to hit on May 22nd). Warner Bros. had plenty of commercial incentive to throw a spectacular presentation here in Cannes, complete with special installations and wild festivities for the full cast and crew who showed up.
The Wachowskis, that provocative duo who apparently had a rough time dealing with reporters after the first movie, skipped the press conference even though they were at the Festival as directors, writers, and executive producers. Because of that, the acting squad stepped up to fill the void, which was exactly what people expected since they caused such a frenzy among the photojournalists. Honestly, it wasn't a shock given that the glamorous crew was led by the heavy-hitting producer Joel Silver along with Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne, Jada Pinkett Smith, Carrie-Anne Moss, and Monica Bellucci, who were already turning heads with their killer looks at the opening night festivities.
The first film was a massive hit back in 1999, and now, following this second installment, we're looking at a third "revolutionary" chapter hitting theaters this November. It’s basically a showcase for cutting-edge tech, utilizing a ton of new, unseen visual tricks and techniques that leave you floored, while still telling the story of humans fighting to survive against machines—these technical monsters programmed to wipe out everything natural and human.
In this sequel, Neo is once again on that unpredictable journey he started when he popped that red pill in the first movie, trying to halt the war against the Machines while backing up his closest allies and friends—the ones who stuck by him no matter what, regardless of whether he had supernatural powers or not...
Keanu Reeves is exactly what you need in a blockbuster lead—he’s got that magnetic look, almost cold on the surface, but underneath it all he's incredibly soulful, steady, and just a genuinely reliable guy. He’s the real deal, a true star for this new century and the generations to come.

Branka Sömen
Larry Scott5 Larry Scott5 Active Member
69 messages
joined Dec 2005
#4 ·
Just a little background info on what's happening, though it’s pretty relevant, I can't help myself:

.....however, the French Ministry of Health decided to toss a quick, blunt warning about Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome—SARS—into the "welcome kit" for accredited journalists, basically demanding they stay on standby for ten days once the festival wraps up.

On top of that, security has been cranked up way higher than in previous years, mostly due to those deadly attacks over in Saudi Arabia.
All the stars and the folks trying desperately to look the part seem caught between genuine excitement and total madness at this "world-renowned spectacle for both cinema lovers and poseurs alike..."

Source—Nat, along with all my media contacts I'm currently surrounded by...
Michelle Howard2 Michelle Howard2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Dec 2002
#5 ·
CANNES, May 16th (From our special Vjesnik correspondent) – Right out of the gate, the Cannes Film Festival has been pivoting toward women and the pressing issues they face. The big talk of the official lineup was definitely Samira Makhmalbaf’s "Five in the Afternoon." She's a 23-year-old director from Iran who’s already making waves at Cannes thanks to her first two films. Samira is actually the daughter of the legendary Iranian filmmaker Mohsen Makhmalbaf, who had his own film, "Kandahar," in the competition here just two years ago—a movie that dove headfirst into the chaos in Afghanistan back in September, tackling the brutal reality of life on the border with Iran.

Given everything that’s gone down over the last couple of years, Samira decided to push even further. Getting caught up in the struggle for women's rights, she tells the story of one woman navigating life after the fall of the Taliban regime. She heads off to a school that’s finally opened its doors to girls, bravely working toward the dream of one day becoming the President of the Republic.

She’s basically studying in secret while dealing with a strictly traditional father—a man deeply rooted in the Taliban lifestyle. Through this intense family drama, we get a gut-wrenching look at the absolute nightmare unfolding across Afghanistan: a landscape filled with hungry, lost souls and refugees fleeing from one corner of the country to the next, dying from starvation, landmines, or airstrikes.

Even though she tackled such a massive, heavy subject using almost documentary-style techniques and non-professional actors, the director hits a bit of a snag. It feels like she couldn't quite decide what to focus on, or maybe she just couldn't narrow it down, resulting in a film that touches on a little bit of everything but struggles to bring every single idea to a satisfying conclusion.

Because she’s jumping between family tension, the total collapse of society, political maneuvering, and feminist movements, the central romance ends up feeling sidelined. Even toward the end, the protagonist’s presidential ambitions—which would have provided some great opportunities for sharp, witty commentary on both society at large and the small details of her immediate world—get left on the cutting room floor.

The conversation around women also drifted into the meeting of thirteen European culture ministers led by Viviane Reding, the EU Commissioner for Culture and Audiovisual Media. They decided that the annual film award presented by Media should go to Peter Mullan’s "Magdalene Sisters," which explores intolerance and the plight of women within a Catholic community in Ireland. That film has been a massive hit, distributed across twelve different countries (though, naturally, there hasn't been much buzz about it here in the States yet) and seen by millions of people—including 600,000 in Italy, 560,000 in France, and 170,000 in Ireland.

Since 2000, the Media award has been given to the first or second film to achieve wide distribution and high viewership across a majority of European nations. The winner walks away with a glass sculpture and 25,000 euros. Past winners include Damien O'Donnell for "East be East," Frederic Fonteyne for "A pornographic love," and Danis Tanović for "No Man's Land."

There was also a roundtable discussion titled "New areas of European film," where filmmakers joined the ministers to talk about how audiences are an indispensable part of the filmmaking process, emphasizing how crucial co-productions are within the European framework. The consensus was that we need to support not just producers, but distributors too, helping them break past national borders and open up to the rest of the continent. The idea is that dialogue between different cultures can help balance things out, ease tensions, and ultimately help European cinema find its footing on the global stage.

Branka Sömen
Michelle Howard2 Michelle Howard2 MemberOP
38 messages
joined Dec 2002
#6 ·
Prepisano iz Vjesnik (21.5.2003)

Lars von Trier’s "Dogville" is such a wild ride, isn't it? It’s one of those movies that just sticks in your brain because it refuses to play by any of the usual rules we expect from Hollywood storytelling. Instead of giving us these lush, immersive sets, he strips everything down to the bare essentials—literally drawing the lines on the floor like a stage play—and forces you to focus entirely on the raw, uncomfortable tension between the characters. It's gritty, it's unapologetic, and honestly, it's pretty polarizing. You either find it absolutely brilliant or completely maddening, but there's no middle ground when you're dealing with a director like von Trier.

With "Dogville" arguably being his strongest work yet, Lars von Trier actually delivered on the hype and single-handedly rescued the Festival from a sea of total mediocrity. It was this raw, unbridled energy and a flood of genuine ideas; the director managed to craft this biting, razor-sharp critique of America—even though he’s never actually lived there—but honestly, it didn't stop him from leaning hard into his own unapologetic perspectives.

CANNES, May 20th (From our special correspondent for Vjesnik) – Honestly, I feel like an American, even though I’ve never actually set foot in the States, but hey, I’m incredibly well-informed since the media has been relentlessly bombarding us since we were kids with every single little detail about that country. I guess I’d paraphrase Kennedy with my own little twist on his famous sentiment: "I am American."

I’d love to get swept up in that sense of absolute freedom everyone talks about in America, but honestly, looking at the results of these election campaigns just kills the mood for me. I’m certain America is a beautiful country, but I’m starting to wonder if I’d actually want to head over there right now, because this version of America definitely wouldn't be the one I have in my head. It feels like the country is being held hostage by a total cultural mismatch. My film *Dogville* isn't some direct critique of America itself; rather, it’s more of a commentary on my own perception of the place. At the end of the day, good and evil live inside every single person and every single society—it's just the circumstances that act like a megaphone, cranking up the volume until those traits finally burst through the surface.

That’s just how Lars von Trier talks—he’s this powerhouse Scandinavian director who’s easily one of the most inventive artists working in the US and Europe right now. He’s got this undeniable genius and a flood of original ideas, fueled by this raw, unbridled energy that just keeps him moving. This provocative guy is constantly pushing his own limits, whether he's diving into avant-garde concepts, sparking the whole Dogme 95 movement, or taking classic genres and flipping them completely on their head. Honestly, he plays with every single facet of filmmaking you can think of, from the pure aesthetics and dramatic structure to the technical grit and deep emotional impact.

So far, he’s actually managed to shape three pretty striking trilogies. You’ve got his first "European trilogy," which kicks things off with those early works like Element of crime (1984), Epidemic (1987), and Europa, Europa (1991). Then there’s the second one, which is really focused on women—it actually takes its name from that children's book, the Golden Heart Trilogy, about this little girl who’s always ready to sacrifice herself. That set includes his heavy hitters like Breaking the Wave (1996), The Idiots (1998), and finally Dance in the Dark (2000), the one that earned him the big Palme d'Or at Cannes.

*Dogville* kicks off the whole "USA – Land of Opportunity" trilogy. It opens with this prologue followed by nine distinct chapters, all tied together by the narrator—played by John Hurt—who keeps peppering the story with these incredibly cynical observations about everything unfolding on screen. The whole thing plays out within this highly stylized, top-down stage set that gives you a bird's-eye view of a tiny little town, situated somewhere in the middle of some remote, forgotten corner of the American provinces near the Rocky Mountains. It’s set during those repressive 1930s years, depicting a community totally cut off from the rest of the world, where people just drift through these seemingly idyllic, yet deeply modest and troubled lives that feel entirely fake and suffocatingly small.
Building a highway straight into a small town can trigger a whole new chapter of life—it’s rarely the idyllic fairy tale people expect, but it's definitely a massive, provocative shake-up. It’s just like when this mysterious, stunning woman named Grace rolls into town and completely flips the script; at first, the locals give her the cold shoulder, but before you know it, they're totally exploiting her, turning her into nothing more than a commodity to serve their every whim.

Hypocrisy, a thirst for revenge, that totally flippant attitude toward women—especially those who actually stand on their own two feet—plus all that narrow-minded provincialism and closed-off exclusivity... it’s basically everything you'd expect from the version of America that Lars von Trier lays bare, showing off his massive talent through his uncompromising way of handling the characters he crafts himself as a screenwriter.
His Grace is right at the heart of everything here—she’s this woman carrying a heavy secret, someone who is ready to sacrifice absolutely everything, just like all his other heroines in his past films, but there's a twist: unlike any of them before, she ends up transforming into this cold, ruthless avenger.

Even if he claims this isn't some grand metaphor for America—arguing that a story like this could unfold in any isolated little bubble—it feels like Lars von Trier is clearly out to settle a score with them. But since we’re talking about a top-tier artist, this showdown isn't some cheap or basic jab; it goes way deeper than just the plot or the setting, reaching instead into the very way the movie is actually built. Instead of leaning on all those slick Hollywood gadgets and high-end special effects that let directors make things look "realer" than what your average filmmaker could ever dream up, Von Trier decides to flip the script entirely. He pulls everything back to square one, staging the whole thing—the streets, the shops, even the characters' apartments—on what looks like a massive theatrical stage where everything feels improvised. From a distance, you see the blueprint of a city, but get closer and it’s clearly just a theater set. Conceptually, when you look at how these people interact, it’s pure cinema, and through the lens of his own vision, it’s exactly what he needed: a sense of being both everything and nothing at once. It’s the perfect way to capture his vision of America—this strange construction of life that exists somewhere in a dreamscape, a place where even a dog isn't really a dog.

It’s funny how people will jump down any other director's throat for being "old-fashioned" or too theatrical, yet when von Trier pulls off this incredibly modern, innovative return to pure dramaturgy—focusing on the raw power of the script without leaning on flashy tech or cheap special effects—suddenly everyone is totally onboard.

Nicole Kidman is absolutely killing it in the lead role as Grace; honestly, it might be the best performance of her entire career. It’s such a massive shame how much she's been pushed around by big Hollywood productions lately, because as a true artist—something I think she knows deep down—she really only finds her spark in a profound, intimate piece of filmmaking like this one from Denmark.

Branka Sömen
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#7 ·
Carl Bennett78 said:.....and just like a true artist—something she’s clearly aware of herself—she really only truly shone in this massive yet intimate Danish film from Europe.

[IRONY]Gosh, I am just so incredibly proud to be a European.[/IRONY]
Robert Cooper41 Robert Cooper41 Member
47 messages
joined Dec 2002
#8 ·
Alright, just doing a quick copy-paste here for everyone to see who actually walked away with the hardware this year (though we all know von Trier + Nicole = 0) 😁 😁

Palme d'Or
Elephant by Gus van Sant (USA)

Best Director award
Elephant by Gus van Sant (USA)

Best Actress award
Maria José Cordeiro - Invasions by Denys Arcand (Quebec)

Best Actor award
Muzaffer Ozdemir and Mehmet Emin Toprak in distant by Nuri Bilge Ceylan (Turkey)

Best Screenplay
Invasions by Denys Arcand (Quebec)

Jury Prize
Five in the Afternoon by Samira Makhmalbaf (Iran)

Grand Jury Prize
distant by Nuri Bilge Ceylan (Turkey)

Caméra d'Or
Reconstruction by Christoffer Boe (Denmark)

Special Mention Caméra d'Or
The Wasp by Sedigh Barmak (Afghanistan)

Short Film Awards
First Prize Cinéfondation Award
Run Rabbit Run by Pavle Vuckov (Mexico)

Second Prize Cinéfondation Award
Story of the Desert by Celia Galan Julve (Spain)

Third Prize Cinéfondation Award
TV City by Alberto Couceiro and Alejandra Tomei (Argentina) and
jointly At That Point... Rebecca by Luciana Gorostiza (Argentina)
driftingowl27 driftingowl27 Active Member
89 messages
joined Dec 2002
#9 ·
Robert Cooper41 said:(von Trier + Nicole = 0)


Is it really any surprise they finally figured out just how shallow his whole approach to filmmaking actually is? I mean, honestly... it only took them a little while to catch on. 🙄
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#10 ·
Honestly, I was halfway ready to end it all if Von Trier walked away with the Palme d'Or, but thank goodness that didn't happen.
Robert Cooper41 Robert Cooper41 Member
47 messages
joined Dec 2002
#11 ·
driftingowl27 said:It’s almost embarrassing how obvious it has become that this guy’s entire approach to filmmaking is fundamentally hollow... though, granted, it did take them a little while to realize it 🙄

Honestly, this whole Cannes affair has turned into quite the spectacle, hasn't it? You have the jury president, Patrice Chereau—who gave us that absolute disaster "Intimacy"—alongside a panel of supposed film "theorists" like Meg Ryan and the former Miss USA, Aishwarya Rai 😁 😁 (and goodness knows I could easily throw Danis Tanovica into that mix if I felt like it 😁 😁 )
And then comes the sheer pretension of it all: awarding a film that—yet again!—obsesses over gun culture in the US and the shooting at Columbine High School (Gus van Sant)... plus we have that one Turkish "art house" flick. From what I can gather, the only things actually worth watching are the Canadian "The Barbarian Invasion" ... and, naturally, Clint Eastwood.
If there is any silver lining to be found here, it might just be the fact that they snubbed Lars von Trier... my most loathed director, following "Dancer in the Dark" 😠 😠 . And don't even get me started on "Dogville"—I mean, really, a three-hour epic about the Great Depression set entirely on a theater stage!? On top of that, the entire production crew seems to have lived in total luxury, racking up a bill of about $500,000 for this festival alone because they insisted on staying in the finest hotels, and of course, special treatment was reserved for Nicole Kidman... but I suppose it was all worth it in the end.😁 😁
driftingowl27 driftingowl27 Active Member
89 messages
joined Dec 2002
#12 ·
Here’s one 🙏 for you to chew on. Ever since that big shot bought out Palmetina to chase after Bjork, this whole festival has been a complete joke. It probably was a mess before too, I just didn't catch it 🙂
Robert Cooper41 Robert Cooper41 Member
47 messages
joined Dec 2002
#13 ·
Oh yeah, there’s another one that looks absolutely fascinating: the American indie flick "American Splendor," which actually made the cut for the "Un Certain Regard" program... it’s all about that underground comic legend Harvey Pekar. And get this—they actually weave in the artwork of the icon Robert Crumb throughout the movie. Here is a snippet from a review:
As a friend of Robert Crumb, sharing that same obsessive, deep-seated passion for jazz, vintage vinyl, and literature, Pekar views himself as nothing more than a casualty of the system. These "comics"—which featured his scripts alongside illustrations by Crumb and others—eventually gave rise to the ironically titled American Splendor. His life is essentially a whirlwind of financial ruin, crushing insecurity, various neuroses, and those endless, grinding daily anxieties, all channeled through the persona of a famously cranky guy with questionable hygiene.

Honestly, the description feels quite similar to Terry Zwigoff's "Ghost World" from last year... and if it holds up even half as well as that one did, it's definitely worth a watch.
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#14 ·
Robert Cooper41 said:...And on top of that, the whole film crew was treated quite well, which meant they racked up about $500,000 in expenses for this festival since they stayed at the absolute best hotels—plus there was all the extra attention focused on Nicole Kidman... but hey, it ended up being worth it.😁 😁

Actually, I’m not so sure it was worth it. The initial buyout offer for "Dogville" was sitting at $4 million. But while they were at the festival, once the hype started building, that price jumped up to $6 million—only for the movie to end up selling for less than that original starting bid.
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#15 ·
Robert Cooper41 said:Oh, and there's one more movie that looks super interesting: the American indie film "American Splendor," which was part of the "Un Certain Regard" lineup... it's about the underground comic book legend Harvey Pekar.

Actually, he wasn't the illustrator, but rather the writer (though Crumb was actually one of the artists who drew his comics!). Also, the film wasn't in the main official selection because it had already picked up steam after winning at Sundance.

By the way, there's usually this strict rule at Cannes where a film can only walk away with a single award. But since the selection felt pretty lackluster this year, the jury actually asked the director to set a precedent, which is how Elephant managed to snag two awards—the Palma and a prize for Best Director.
Robert Cooper41 Robert Cooper41 Member
47 messages
joined Dec 2002
#16 ·
Richard Hernandez13 said:And maybe it wasn't even worth the effort in the end. The initial buyout offer for "Dogville" was sitting at $4 million. Then, while the festival was in full swing and all this massive buzz started building around the film, the price shot up to $6 million—only for it to eventually sell for less than that original starting point.

I actually had no idea that was the case 😁 😁 ... and when I brought up "Dogville" earlier, I was being purely ironic about whether that massive expense for the festival presentation actually "paid off" for them. Honestly, I can already see von Trier pivoting back to those gritty, low-budget Dogma 95 rules for his next project. 😁 😁
Robert Cooper41 Robert Cooper41 Member
47 messages
joined Dec 2002
#17 ·
Richard Hernandez13 said:He wasn't actually the illustrator, he was the screenwriter (Crumb was just one of the guys drawing the comics). And the film wasn't even in the official selection because it had already snagged a win at Sundance.

My mistake there... I clearly didn't read my own quote closely enough.😉 But honestly, isn't the most fascinating thing about this whole movie the way they weave those comic book illustrations directly into the narrative? They try to replicate that specific comic book "mise en scene" within the live-action shots themselves—though, heaven knows, how on earth did that actually turn out?
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#18 ·
Robert Cooper41 said:My bad... I didn't read my own quote very closely before posting.😉 I think the most fascinating thing about this movie is how they weave comic book illustrations directly into the storytelling... using that specific comic book "mise en scene" within the film itself (even if it feels a little experimental!).

The real clever part is how > blends scripted scenes with these almost "documentary" segments. You have Paul Giamatti playing Pekar in the scripted parts, while the actual Pekar plays himself in the documentary sections. To make things even more interesting, the documentary footage was shot on digital video, while the scripted portions were filmed on 35mm.
driftingowl27 driftingowl27 Active Member
89 messages
joined Dec 2002
#19 ·
Robert Cooper41 said:And when I brought up "Dogville"


By the way, word is that for Nicole Kidman's $10 million payday back then, the bulk of it was supposedly covered by the Danish Ministry of Culture. What a freaking scandal. They could have used that cash to fund those Dogma 95 movies of theirs—maybe one of them actually would've been decent for once...🙄

(P.S. Just realized how I quoted you there... 😁 )
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#20 ·
driftingowl27 said:By the way, word is that for Nicole Kidman's $10 million fee back then, the bulk of it was allegedly covered by the Danish Ministry of Culture. What a total scandal—they could have used that money to fund those Dogma films of theirs, maybe one would actually turn out decent....🙄


Where are you even getting that info about Nicole Kidman making $10 million for Dogville?

I was reading an interview with Lars recently where he mentioned she took a symbolic amount... something like 10 times less than her usual per-movie rate. Apparently, working with Lars had always been a dream of hers after seeing Lomeci val.... so she agreed to a huge pay cut jedino kaj jedva.

The only thing I'm actually looking forward to at the Cannes festival is the new Michael Haneke 🙂)) and the new Samir film 🙂 👋

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads