#1 ·
I was wondering, what kind of criteria do they actually use to delete posts on the politics board?
Even if we just overlook the fact that a moderator stepped in and wiped out two entire pages of discussion regarding communism—instead of actually handing out some visible warnings to bluecyclist64, who basically insulted the few of us here by calling us entitled expats with no right to speak on the subject—it still leaves me wondering. Why are certain posts being deleted when they don't even contain personal attacks?
Is bluecyclist64 part of some protected class or something? I mean, how does he get to delete a post like mine twice?
In most normal countries, taxes are supposed to go toward things everyone actually uses—like infrastructure, the court system, and stuff like that. It shouldn't be some chaotic scramble where money just gets handed out to whoever happens to be in power at the moment. I guess that's just how it should work.
Is it actually against the rules to push back against bluecyclist64? It feels like any post trying to counter his points gets wiped, yet his provocative rants—which are basically just twisted logic—stay up on the thread without any issue.
I’m reposting this because I’d honestly rather just take the ban myself. That way, I can actually demand an explanation for why it happened. The way things are being handled makes me feel like bluecyclist64 is being given a free pass to provoke and insult everyone without consequences. Meanwhile, if any of us try to call out his nonsense using a polite tone, we get shut down. It feels like it's easier to silence the people trying to be civil and avoid personal attacks than it is to actually ban a troll. I guess it's just easier that way.
Even if we just overlook the fact that a moderator stepped in and wiped out two entire pages of discussion regarding communism—instead of actually handing out some visible warnings to bluecyclist64, who basically insulted the few of us here by calling us entitled expats with no right to speak on the subject—it still leaves me wondering. Why are certain posts being deleted when they don't even contain personal attacks?
Is bluecyclist64 part of some protected class or something? I mean, how does he get to delete a post like mine twice?
Quote: bluecyclist64 said:Look at this genius! 👏
Honestly, I guess any country where citizens actually have to pay taxes could be considered communist... 😵
In most normal countries, taxes are supposed to go toward things everyone actually uses—like infrastructure, the court system, and stuff like that. It shouldn't be some chaotic scramble where money just gets handed out to whoever happens to be in power at the moment. I guess that's just how it should work.
Is it actually against the rules to push back against bluecyclist64? It feels like any post trying to counter his points gets wiped, yet his provocative rants—which are basically just twisted logic—stay up on the thread without any issue.
I’m reposting this because I’d honestly rather just take the ban myself. That way, I can actually demand an explanation for why it happened. The way things are being handled makes me feel like bluecyclist64 is being given a free pass to provoke and insult everyone without consequences. Meanwhile, if any of us try to call out his nonsense using a polite tone, we get shut down. It feels like it's easier to silence the people trying to be civil and avoid personal attacks than it is to actually ban a troll. I guess it's just easier that way.