Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions ›
ZK - clarification on rules regarding the men's and women's community and user records
ZK - clarification on rules regarding the men's and women's community and user records
Started by stormyraven14 · · 👁 10 views · 68 replies
#62 ·
What is wrong with you people regarding Nathan Brooks4? So what if you find his posts about signing up boring? Who cares?
Personally, I find reading Lastan’s condescending and arrogant tone exhausting too, but I just stay quiet... or rather, I only speak up when things turn into blatant insults.
Nathan Brooks4 hasn't insulted anyone, and honestly, pointing out his typos shouldn't be the entire basis of this discussion.
Besides, it’s pretty pathetic to derail a conversation by nitpicking grammar; usually, that's just a sign you don't have a real argument left.
Those folks above with the caps lock—both sides, really—are just uninformed amateurs... 🤷
Personally, I find reading Lastan’s condescending and arrogant tone exhausting too, but I just stay quiet... or rather, I only speak up when things turn into blatant insults.
Nathan Brooks4 hasn't insulted anyone, and honestly, pointing out his typos shouldn't be the entire basis of this discussion.
Besides, it’s pretty pathetic to derail a conversation by nitpicking grammar; usually, that's just a sign you don't have a real argument left.
Those folks above with the caps lock—both sides, really—are just uninformed amateurs... 🤷
#63 ·
Nathan Brooks4 is the only one from that thread I actually reported. And seriously, can someone please kick him out of these discussions? We’re trying to have a conversation here, but he just shows up to insult people and derail everything—honestly, he's more aggravating than a bad case of food poisoning...
#64 ·
Look, I’m just here to discuss the topic at hand—I’m definitely not the one derailing this conversation. If anyone is steering things off course, it’s the people writing entire paragraphs about me instead of actually addressing the subject! It seems like since there aren't any real rebuttals to my arguments, the goal now is just to try and shut me down and kick me out of the thread. I haven't insulted a single soul here, even if I have been targeted myself.
#65 ·
Nathan Brooks4 said:Look, I’m just here to discuss the topic at hand—I’m definitely not the one derailing this conversation. If anyone is steering things off course, it’s the people writing entire paragraphs about me instead of actually addressing the subject! It seems like since there aren't any real rebuttals to my arguments, the goal now is just to try and shut me down and kick me out of the thread. I haven't insulted a single soul here, even if I have been targeted myself.
Here we go. You pull this same crap in every single damn post. I haven't seen a single one of these "arguments" you claim to be making. And whenever someone actually dismantles your point, you just retreat to "you have no answer for my arguments" or call everyone liars... it's pathetic.
#66 ·
Kate Foster12, any "tangents" I took were really just me circling back to address points that had become indirectly relevant. For instance—Lastan veered off into discussing whether government officials are insured, so I jumped in just to correct his claim that they’re never in danger; I mean, how could he possibly know that? From there, the conversation spiraled into debates about literacy levels just to eventually turn into personal insults directed at me. Pointing out that those insults were offensive isn't "derailing" the thread—it was them who derailed it! That didn't seem to bother you, did it? As for my actual arguments: I brought up human rights by citing a major federal court ruling, and regarding the negative fallout seen after all the activists' demands are met, I shared a link in my reply to Timothy Jackson2 that everyone seemed to ignore. I also touched on how the parades are funded, only to be told they run entirely on donations—which, let's be honest, just isn't accurate.
#67 ·
Kate Foster12 said:Here we go. You pull this same crap in every single damn post. I haven't seen a single one of these "arguments" you claim to be making. And whenever someone actually dismantles your point, you just retreat to "you have no answer for my arguments" or call everyone liars... it's pathetic.
And you know what else is just hilarious? He can't even tell the difference between a genuine ad hominem attack and someone actually addressing what he wrote.
#68 ·
I get it—really, I do. But honestly, who among you was making such a huge deal out of it when some beta female wrote two entire posts about me just because I typed "nobi" instead of "not"?
It seems like there’s a massive trend here of people claiming they don't understand something, simply because *other* people don't get it either.
Actually, let's make that three posts:
And now we're talking about ad hominem attacks? Please. It feels like all you really care about is finding ways to shut me down because you've run out of actual arguments.
It seems like there’s a massive trend here of people claiming they don't understand something, simply because *other* people don't get it either.
Actually, let's make that three posts:
And now we're talking about ad hominem attacks? Please. It feels like all you really care about is finding ways to shut me down because you've run out of actual arguments.
#69 ·
Timothy Jackson2, seriously, you guys are still at it here? I’m going to head back through this mountain of new posts in a bit, so don't be shocked if I end up shutting down a few of these dead-end arguments if things get out of hand. The ladies have already made their positions crystal clear on everything they needed to address, so why don't you all just head over to the official forum thread and join them there? I have a feeling they're more than ready to deal with you. 😳
🔗 Similar threads
- Small town community bonds vs. sudden tragedy in The World Around Us · Jul 30, 2026
- Is the "sense of community" thing just a myth when things get real? in The World Around Us · Jul 30, 2026
- When does "following the rules" become a loophole? in Politics · Jul 30, 2026
- Massive redevelopment projects: Community input or just a formality? in Real Estate · Jul 30, 2026
- Policy shifts and the "rules" game in Politics · Jul 30, 2026