CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Nora - terrible lion. Forum, show your big heart once again!

Nora - terrible lion. Forum, show your big heart once again!

Started by jadecyclist42 · · 👁 8 views · 46 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants jadecyclist42Daniel Ward87graniteridge6ambermason16brightpumaHenry Campbell5vividtiger922hollowtrucker77Amanda Diazcasualfalcon76melloworca6Henry Hernandez7Peter Doyle2Sandra Gonzalez3rustydrifter10northernpilot2Nicholas Kingjadeseal4Harold Adams7Nicholas Ruiz72
brightpuma brightpuma Active Member
128 messages
joined Jun 2024
#21 ·
Daniel Ward87 said:Reddit isn't collecting any donations here; we're just sharing a notice that was already all over the news anyway. If we went by your logic, every news outlet covering this would be breaking the law.

Correct me if I've got that wrong.

I'll explain it to you in a DM once I get home in a bit.
Peter Doyle2 Peter Doyle2 Active Member
170 messages
joined May 2012
#22 ·
I just wanted to weigh in here—since I was actually one of the people asking for a global announcement for Nora, I think it's important to note how unique her story is. It’s been picked up by absolutely every media outlet and social media platform out there; the whole country and even parts of Europe have taken notice. Plus, all donations are being handled through an official association rather than some random private bank account.
That’s why I felt that we, as the largest forum in the US, should do our part and support the cause via a global announcement.

Just to reiterate, Nora's situation is special, and it had already made a massive impact everywhere before any global announcement was even posted.

On another note, I am strictly against the forum supporting or posting announcements for every single cause that pops up in the news. As incredible as it might seem to some of you, yes, there are people out there who exploit their own child's illness. We've seen it all happen on forums before, and we've had some pretty unpleasant experiences here at Rid, which is exactly why the decision was made to only support actions that go through verified non-profit organizations.
Everything else—as harsh as that may sound—doesn't belong in the global announcements.

Besides, global announcements really should involve two-way communication; you need the organizers, the association, or someone truly involved in the situation who can provide timely and accurate info. It shouldn't just be a copy-paste job from a news article.
Henry Hernandez7 Henry Hernandez7 Active Member
128 messages
joined Apr 2014
#23 ·
brightpuma said:I'll explain it to you in a DM once I get home in a bit.

Just explain it here in public so the rest of us can figure out what the catch is.
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#24 ·
hollowtrucker77 said:Look, buddy, if you're feeling particularly enlightened—especially when it comes to offering a helping hand—I'm pretty certain you can always find people in your own neck of the woods who could use some assistance.
We all have those moments where our hearts swell and empathy takes over, though unfortunately, common sense doesn't always kick in for everyone at the same time.
And let's be real, sometimes that kindness gets taken advantage of.
🙂
Even if it doesn't, there are countless situations where help is either requested or desperately needed, so is it really fair to discriminate based on who's getting more coverage in the news?

If I get taken advantage of, that's on me. I don't need you lecturing me about it, thanks. Who I surround myself with and who I choose to help is my business and mine alone. Honestly, I’d much rather see a new charity drive in the news every single day than have to read about what some British heir is up to.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#25 ·
Amanda Diaz said:If I get taken advantage of, that's on me. I don't need you lecturing me about it, thanks. Who I surround myself with and who I choose to help is my business and mine alone. Honestly, I’d much rather see a new charity drive in the news every single day than have to read about what some British heir is up to.

Look, if Reddit, the admins, or the mods are complicit in any way, then it isn't just on you—it's on all of us. 😉 Once someone gets scammed two or three times, people start getting suspicious and they just stop wanting to help altogether.

There’s been plenty of drama on this forum before, so I don't know why everyone is acting surprised that some people are being cautious.
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#26 ·
melloworca6 said:Look, if Reddit, the admins, or the mods are complicit in any way, then it isn't just on you—it's on all of us. 😉 Once someone gets scammed two or three times, people start getting suspicious and they just stop wanting to help altogether.

There’s been plenty of drama on this forum before, so I don't know why everyone is acting surprised that some people are being cautious.

Why should anyone on a forum be held responsible? You shared the news; whether someone chooses to act on it or not is entirely their own business. If I start a thread claiming World War III has broken out, and some idiots on the stock market panic and tanked share prices because of it, am I the one at fault, or are those idiots? I’ve actually been messaging the administrator about this exact topic. I told her straight up that I’ve been swindled that way several times in my life. Does that mean we shouldn't give money—even if it's pocket change to me—to the next person who says they desperately need it?

Personally, I’d rather be scammed by three more people like Nora for a few cents than fail to help one little Nora who actually needs it.
Peter Doyle2 Peter Doyle2 Active Member
170 messages
joined May 2012
#27 ·
Amanda Diaz said:Why should anyone on a forum be held responsible? You shared the news; whether someone chooses to act on it or not is entirely their own business. If I start a thread claiming World War III has broken out, and some idiots on the stock market panic and tanked share prices because of it, am I the one at fault, or are those idiots? I’ve actually been messaging the administrator about this exact topic. I told her straight up that I’ve been swindled that way several times in my life. Does that mean we shouldn't give money—even if it's pocket change to me—to the next person who says they desperately need it?

Personally, I’d rather be scammed by three more people like Nora for a few cents than fail to help one little Nora who actually needs it.

Look, that’s exactly where the issue lies. As a media outlet—like a platform like Reddit—by publishing and backing unverified fundraisers, we could actually end up doing way more harm than good. Why? Because, honestly, a huge number of people don't think quite like you do. If they get scammed once—even just by a few bucks—they might lose all faith in giving altogether, and that ends up hurting someone else who truly needs help down the road.

We aren't just individuals—we are the Borg. 🤣And we really need to be careful about what we put out there as media—especially since we've already been burned a few times before.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#28 ·
Amanda Diaz said:Why should anyone on a forum be held responsible? You shared the news; whether someone chooses to act on it or not is entirely their own business. If I start a thread claiming World War III has broken out, and some idiots on the stock market panic and tanked share prices because of it, am I the one at fault, or are those idiots? I’ve actually been messaging the administrator about this exact topic. I told her straight up that I’ve been swindled that way several times in my life. Does that mean we shouldn't give money—even if it's pocket change to me—to the next person who says they desperately need it?

Personally, I’d rather be scammed by three more people like Nora for a few cents than fail to help one little Nora who actually needs it.

Go explain that to the women on Rid who were sending cash, clothes, baby gear, toys, cosmetics, and everything else. They aren't crazy for being skeptical and refusing to believe anyone when they come begging for stuff, especially after they've found donated items being resold all over the internet, forums, or Craigslist...

And you also have to consider that during these kinds of drives, some people are literally taking food out of their own mouths just to help out. It's not like everyone has extra cash lying around that they don't need, and it's not like they aren't going to feel the sting when they realize their money went to someone who didn't deserve it.
jadecyclist42 jadecyclist42 MemberOP
10 messages
joined Nov 2011
#29 ·
Anastasia Udovičić is, let me repeat, just a tiny 2.5-year-old girl. She's being raised by her 23-year-old mother, and they’re currently renting a place together. She's fighting a serious battle with leukemia, and unfortunately, her mom doesn't have a network of influential friends—unlike Nora's parents, who could use their connections to make an appeal like this go massive.

If anyone is skeptical, I guess you should just head over to the Facebook page for little Anastasia linked here.
My heart just breaks for this little girl. Honestly, I'm incredibly angry at those self-righteous types who clearly love acting like they're so wise and smart at everyone else's expense.

Cynicism just strips everything of its value. Look, nobody is forcing you to donate, but maybe just let other people make their own choices about whether they want to give or not.
I don't really get why you all feel the need to patronize the forum admins and everyone else by trying to "enlighten" them. I guess you think they aren't smart enough?
We are talking about children here. We're talking about small, precious lives.

Daniel Ward87
owes a huge thank you for showing some actual empathy and humanity, setting aside that cynical attitude despite having had a few bad experiences in the past.

If someone wants to play Sherlock Holmes and investigate whether this cause is a scam or not, then fine—do it privately on Facebook or start your own investigation.

The whole situation with Nora has turned into a complete vanity project. It feels like everyone thinks they *have* to hit like, or show off how charitable they are. It was all fine when they were busy criticizing mothers they thought were scammers before the fashion cat and Vedran Ćorluka stepped up to support the cause. But now that a defenseless little thing like this girl comes along—a child without a father and a mom who isn't part of the "right" social circles—suddenly everyone wants to play judge and jury.

The admin for Anastasia's page is her own mother. There are plenty of photos there, so please, just go look. If you actually have any heart, don't you dare criticize her for simply trying to save her daughter's life.
I mean, imagine that—she made the "mistake" of being a single mom to a sick child? Who's to blame for that, huh, you moral paragons?!
jadecyclist42 jadecyclist42 MemberOP
10 messages
joined Nov 2011
#30 ·
Suzana Udovičić (23) was three months pregnant when she lost her brother, Mark, in a tragic car accident. By her sixth month, doctors diagnosed her baby with an abdominal wall defect. She eventually gave birth to Anastasia in Rijeka via emergency C-section at eight months. It was critical—the baby barely made it. Even though she weighed only about 3.9 pounds, neither mother nor daughter gave up. The father doesn't want anything to do with them. Now, Suzana lives in a Caritas home in Vukomerac, spending every waking moment by her daughter's side, just waiting for the day they can finally leave the hospital.

- Please, we need your help. We really do, - pleaded Suzana, who is currently surviving on just $533 maternity benefits. If you can find it in your heart to help Anastasia, donations can be sent directly to Suzana Udovičić’s checking account at Chicago bank. The account number is 3235036801.
Sandra Gonzalez3 Sandra Gonzalez3 Active Member
105 messages
joined Oct 2008
#31 ·
jadecyclist42, I'm guessing you know her mom personally.

Tell her she should reach out to some of those charity organizations... it'll make everything way easier that way.
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#32 ·
melloworca6 said:Go explain that to the women on Rid who were sending cash, clothes, baby gear, toys, cosmetics, and everything else. They aren't crazy for being skeptical and refusing to believe anyone when they come begging for stuff, especially after they've found donated items being resold all over the internet, forums, or Craigslist...

And you also have to consider that during these kinds of drives, some people are literally taking food out of their own mouths just to help out. It's not like everyone has extra cash lying around that they don't need, and it's not like they aren't going to feel the sting when they realize their money went to someone who didn't deserve it.

Who am I supposed to be explaining this to? Everyone acts according to their own conscience. Save that pathetic "taking food from their mouths" sob story for someone else. I mean, you can count those people on one hand, and usually, they're immediately canonized as saints the moment they pass away (just Google Mother Teresa). Whether you choose to share news on this forum or include a disclaimer if you haven't personally verified someone is entirely up to you.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#33 ·
jadecyclist42, cut the melodrama. 🙄

Global announcements are usually reserved for vetted campaigns where there’s actual two-way communication and feedback. Have you actually spoken to this mother? Does she even know people are on Reddit trying to raise money for them? Is it possible to run this through a non-profit or some association so everything stays transparent?

The admins have specific responsibilities to the site as a business and to the users. If they didn't, everyone would just be using the platform to advertise, sell stuff, or solicit money constantly. I feel for you, girl, but posts like this don't help get any campaign—this one or any other—pinned to the top. It makes it look like if you're loud enough, you can bypass all the rules. That's a great attitude: "Listen to me or you're just annoying know-it-alls."

Amanda Diaz said:Who am I supposed to be explaining this to? Everyone acts according to their own conscience. Save that pathetic "taking food from their mouths" sob story for someone else. I mean, you can count those people on one hand, and usually, they're immediately canonized as saints the moment they pass away (just Google Mother Teresa). Whether you choose to share news on this forum or include a disclaimer if you haven't personally verified someone is entirely up to you.

Actually, that's not a bad idea. 🙂
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#34 ·
I’m right there with melloworca6 and Peter Doyle2 on this one. As a community that handles global announcements, we really need to step up and handle this with a sense of responsibility. Ideally, there should always be a dedicated follow-up thread where people can actually reach out to the organizers if they have questions or just want to leave a comment. We've seen way too many instances of scams—some more successful than others—trying to sneak through here, and while at the end of the day everyone is responsible for their own choices, we have a duty to show some caution when we're posting these kinds of drives.

That's why I'm also leaning towards the idea that any campaign intended for a global announcement here on Reddit should be backed by an actual non-profit organization and include a specific discussion topic for feedback. There could be exceptions, sure, but even then, nothing should be posted based solely on a copy-paste job from a news article. Besides, that's pretty much how we usually handle things anyway.
northernpilot2 northernpilot2 Active Member
201 messages
joined Oct 2013
#35 ·
Helping Nora is a legitimate cause, and honestly, I think the chances of anyone actually scamming the system here are pretty slim.
Every single major media outlet in the country has jumped on board, so I really don't see why there's an issue with the biggest American forum joining the movement too.
We really need to stop looking for a villain in every situation; this is just a beautiful initiative that's bringing together people who are barely scraping by themselves, all to help this little girl.
jadecyclist42 jadecyclist42 MemberOP
10 messages
joined Nov 2011
#36 ·
melloworca6 said:jadecyclist42, cut the melodrama. 🙄

Global announcements are usually reserved for vetted campaigns where there’s actual two-way communication and feedback. Have you actually spoken to this mother? Does she even know people are on Reddit trying to raise money for them? Is it possible to run this through a non-profit or some association so everything stays transparent?

The admins have specific responsibilities to the site as a business and to the users. If they didn't, everyone would just be using the platform to advertise, sell stuff, or solicit money constantly. I feel for you, girl, but posts like this don't help get any campaign—this one or any other—pinned to the top. It makes it look like if you're loud enough, you can bypass all the rules. That's a great attitude: "Listen to me or you're just annoying know-it-alls."

Actually, that's not a bad idea. 🙂

Good grief, you clearly didn't read what I wrote, yet you're trying to lecture me??!

I think I mentioned about twenty-five times how this campaign works on the exact same principle as Nora's case.

There is a Facebook page where one of the admins is the mother herself, so you can contact her directly to ask for specifics.
A local non-profit has stepped in, and we're just waiting on the phone number for donations to help little Anastasia.
The page has nearly a million photos showing the girl's journey through the months in the hospital.
There are news articles too; I personally linked stories from major US outlets.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pomoz...ref=ts&fref=ts

The only real difference between Nora and little Anastasia is that Nora was lucky enough that her parents "know the right people," so she got much more publicity than, say, Stephanie or little Anastasia.

No, I'm not Anastasia's parent; I'm just noticing that not everyone is as well-connected or as lucky as Nora and her family.
What I really resent about the admin of Nora's page is that he wasn't able—aside from Zanetti, who probably only posted because of Mateo Kovačić's suggestion—to like or support the pages of other children in need. Once it became obvious that Nora
would raise the necessary funds, he could have at least made that gesture, especially since his page gained an insane amount of likes.
For comparison, little Stephanie had just over 10,000 likes, while Nora's page has over 80,000 as of today. That kind of exposure could have been used for other kids and pressing issues, but I guess not.

This child only has her single, very young mother, who is forced to live on $533 welfare benefits for single moms because she's renting in Washington, D.C., since she isn't originally from there, while the little girl receives treatment here and waits for a transplant in Italy.
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#37 ·
jadecyclist42 said:Good grief, you clearly didn't read what I wrote, yet you're trying to lecture me??!

I think I mentioned about twenty-five times how this campaign works on the exact same principle as Nora's case.

There is a Facebook page where one of the admins is the mother herself, so you can contact her directly to ask for specifics.
A local non-profit has stepped in, and we're just waiting on the phone number for donations to help little Anastasia.
The page has nearly a million photos showing the girl's journey through the months in the hospital.
There are news articles too; I personally linked stories from major US outlets.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pomoz...ref=ts&fref=ts

The only real difference between Nora and little Anastasia is that Nora was lucky enough that her parents "know the right people," so she got much more publicity than, say, Stephanie or little Anastasia.

No, I'm not Anastasia's parent; I'm just noticing that not everyone is as well-connected or as lucky as Nora and her family.
What I really resent about the admin of Nora's page is that he wasn't able—aside from Zanetti, who probably only posted because of Mateo Kovačić's suggestion—to like or support the pages of other children in need. Once it became obvious that Nora
would raise the necessary funds, he could have at least made that gesture, especially since his page gained an insane amount of likes.
For comparison, little Stephanie had just over 10,000 likes, while Nora's page has over 80,000 as of today. That kind of exposure could have been used for other kids and pressing issues, but I guess not.

This child only has her single, very young mother, who is forced to live on $533 welfare benefits for single moms because she's renting in Washington, D.C., since she isn't originally from there, while the little girl receives treatment here and waits for a transplant in Italy.

Watch your mouth, will you? 🤦.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#38 ·
northernpilot2 said:Helping Nora is a legitimate cause, and honestly, I think the chances of anyone actually scamming the system here are pretty slim.
Every single major media outlet in the country has jumped on board, so I really don't see why there's an issue with the biggest American forum joining the movement too.
We really need to stop looking for a villain in every situation; this is just a beautiful initiative that's bringing together people who are barely scraping by themselves, all to help this little girl.

Nora also went through the Brave Child association, so I find it hard to believe there’s any fraud going on here. 🙂

jadecyclist42 said:Good grief, you clearly didn't read what I wrote, yet you're trying to lecture me??!

I think I mentioned about twenty-five times how this campaign works on the exact same principle as Nora's case.

There is a Facebook page where one of the admins is the mother herself, so you can contact her directly to ask for specifics.
A local non-profit has stepped in, and we're just waiting on the phone number for donations to help little Anastasia.
The page has nearly a million photos showing the girl's journey through the months in the hospital.
There are news articles too; I personally linked stories from major US outlets.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pomoz...ref=ts&fref=ts

The only real difference between Nora and little Anastasia is that Nora was lucky enough that her parents "know the right people," so she got much more publicity than, say, Stephanie or little Anastasia.

No, I'm not Anastasia's parent; I'm just noticing that not everyone is as well-connected or as lucky as Nora and her family.
What I really resent about the admin of Nora's page is that he wasn't able—aside from Zanetti, who probably only posted because of Mateo Kovačić's suggestion—to like or support the pages of other children in need. Once it became obvious that Nora
would raise the necessary funds, he could have at least made that gesture, especially since his page gained an insane amount of likes.
For comparison, little Stephanie had just over 10,000 likes, while Nora's page has over 80,000 as of today. That kind of exposure could have been used for other kids and pressing issues, but I guess not.

This child only has her single, very young mother, who is forced to live on $533 welfare benefits for single moms because she's renting in Washington, D.C., since she isn't originally from there, while the little girl receives treatment here and waits for a transplant in Italy.

First off, maybe tone it down a bit and watch how you talk. I've already told you that writing like this doesn't help anyone, especially not the little girl you claim to be standing up for.

Second, does that girl's mom even know someone is asking to put a global announcement on the forum? Just because she gave her info to the media doesn't mean anyone has the right to drag her story around wherever they want. And is the fundraising for the little one going through an official association?
Nora's campaign went through the Brave Child association. I assume that organization knows what they're doing and is responsible for everything collected.

Third, please stop implying that Nora's parents just have "better marketing" or whatever. It's actually pretty gross to read. Your posts aren't helping this little girl at all—if anything, they're doing the opposite. 😢
Henry Hernandez7 Henry Hernandez7 Active Member
128 messages
joined Apr 2014
#39 ·
Americans bumped up the cost of experimental treatment to $4.7 million😢
jadeseal4 jadeseal4 Member
29 messages
joined Apr 2013
#40 ·
Henry Hernandez7 said:Americans bumped up the cost of experimental treatment to $4.7 million😢

Heartless individuals participating in a heartless robbery.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads