Appeal regarding ego's data deletion

cosmicgull52 said:It’s like I’m looking through a thick fog trying to remember this one specific moment, but I distinctly recall Sky coming out swinging, making this super bold, almost fearless claim that "only" a million Jews were lost during the entire Holocaust. Then, fast forward about ten posts later—once she realized she had totally overstepped—she tries to backtrack, claiming she was actually only referring to what happened at Auschwitz. But man, it was way too late for that. The crowd there, those "useful idiots" for Zionism as you guys always love to label them, jumped all over her and slapped her with a ban before she could even finish her explanation.

Look, I don't think she was trying to downplay anything or play fast and loose with the facts. From what I gathered, she was just attempting to set the record straight on some details that might have been historically shaky or just plain wrong. Honestly, there’s a chance that making those kinds of tweaks is actually necessary if you're aiming for total historical accuracy. Now, from a purely moral standpoint? Absolutely not. If we're talking about the weight of human life, whether it's 600 victims or 60, it's still a massive tragedy. There's zero relativization happening there. Personally, I'm not going to get dragged into an argument over specific numbers like that—it's exhausting, and frankly, it's not even the point of this discussion.
Honestly, I don't think it's fair to go around slapping the Nazi label on someone unless they’re actually being malicious about it. If someone says something out of line but there wasn't any real ill will behind it, calling them a Nazi feels like a massive stretch. You've gotta look at the intent, you know? I've seen people get canceled over total misunderstandings, and it just feels wrong to jump straight to the most extreme accusation possible if they weren't actually trying to be hateful.

cosmicgull52 said:Man, I’m telling you, if you started spouting that kind of wild fantasy nonsense in most civilized parts of the US, you’d be looking at some serious jail time. Seriously!

Are we talking pure fantasy here? Prison time? Give me a break—that’s a massive stretch.
Look, if you’re hinting at that whole topic everyone was just tearing into, let’s be real—it’s not some deep-state mystery or some wild fantasy about who the heavy hitters are in this global game. Everyone knows exactly who is pulling the strings; people just don't like talking about it out loud because it's uncomfortable. It’s an open secret, man. Seriously, these aren't just crazy theories; they are straight-up facts. We're talking about the elite, the inner circle, the handlers, the protégés, the whole damn lot. When you look at what they’re actually doing to the economy, to the world, and to us regular folks... honestly, in any sane, functioning society, they’d be behind bars right now. But we all know how that works—in a real civilization, this kind of stuff would be treated as high-level crime, but here? They get a pass.

P.S. Honestly, I’ve ended up stuck deep in the off-topic weeds myself because you guys have gone absolutely wild with the spamming lately. It feels like we can't even have a real conversation without the thread veering completely off the rails!

I am telling you this with the best intentions and zero irony.

If you aren't willing to admit that someone claiming the Holocaust deaths were six times lower than they actually were—considering it is one of the most meticulously documented events in history—is minimizing Nazi crimes, then you need to take a hard look at your own moral integrity. Whether they did it out of ignorance, stupidity, or malice, it's a massive issue. You really should reflect on that.

Furthermore, from a purely utilitarian standpoint, these extremes—and even your milder versions of ancient antisemitic stereotypes rebranded for today—only damage the cause you claim to support. Most reasonable people will read something like that, see it paired with nonsense like that woman having a physical reaction to vaccinated people or Benjamin Franklin types scanning people via Bluetooth, and simply close the tab to go take a shower.

There are perfectly legitimate reasons to be concerned and have serious discussions about vaccines, but when you act like this, you are just constantly shooting yourselves in the foot.

Tyler Garcia69 said:The devil was at my shoulder again, so I clicked 'view post'... because GoB just won't stop spamming and going off-topic.

I know exactly what was said.
Specifically, these words: you Nazi and your little crew (that "crew" comment was aimed at Sky)

So, it’s a lie. Out of nowhere, I’m being branded a Nazi.

And you're making it up. You can't find it because a post like that doesn't even exist. It is painfully obvious what you are insinuating.
Aleta, acting as the moderator for this thread, could easily confirm that no such posts exist—nor have they ever. No one in this group is a Holocaust denier, nor does anyone hold neo-Nazi sentiments. When we discuss things here, specifically regarding the conspiracies of banking cartels and the rest of the global mafia, we are light-years away from the accusations you are desperately trying to suggest.
This is just another one of your slippery attempts to slander people and bait others into getting sanctioned or banned. It’s greasy and underhanded.

And what should we say about your attempt to slander Jews and incite others to call for their sanctioning? Not to mention how your own kind efficiently banned them—or rather, permanently removed them—during the thirties and forties?

Linda King said:Link to my post:

https://www.forum.com/showpost.php?p=...postcount=8346

Here it is once more in the quote:

Thanks, I love snakes. 😛

Well, look at that. Not only is he lying about the content of your posts, but he's actually editing his own within minutes.
A true warrior against the Zionist beast; Dr. Joseph would be proud of his student.

I checked out those links @guns posted... just a total antisemitic mess, honestly. So twisted.
Even @Arthur Smith15/">@@Arthur Smith15 hasn't gone nearly that far.

And now this guy actually has the nerve to complain? 🤦

bluecyclist64 said:And what about your attempt to smear Jews and egg others on to sanction them? Not to mention how your own crowd effectively banned them—or rather, permabanned them—during the thirties and forties?

Man, what "smearing Jews"? We’re talking about banking cartels, powerful Zionist lobbies, and organized crime syndicates. We're talking about the people at the absolute top who have basically seized control of government positions, tech giants, Big Pharma, and the massive mainstream media outlets. And all of them, wouldn't you know it, are pushing this whole pandemic boogeyman narrative. My comments were strictly focused on those specific individuals, which you can clearly see if you actually bother to read my posts. Honestly, it doesn't matter if they're Eskimos, Aborigines, or Jews. Like I said before, I’m all for calling things like they are; let's name the suspects. It’s just common sense. If we call out certain groups when they hold power and engage in shady dealings—like how we'd call out corrupt politicians back home—are we suddenly "anti-group" just for pointing it out? If there are hundreds or thousands of them in those positions doing the exact same thing, and you point that out, are you suddenly crazy too? Or is there actually a grain of truth and reality in what I'm saying? Your mindless accusations are totally off base and, frankly, pretty bold and rude. But hey, I guess that’s what I should expect from you.

As for this person rambling on about an antisemitic frenzy, she obviously hasn't a clue what's going on. She just skimmed the surface and jumped straight to a sweeping conclusion. If there were even a tiny shred of truth to the nonsense some of you are blathering about, you might actually find it somewhere in my hundreds, maybe thousands, of previous posts. But you won't. Because this is nothing more than the perception of your closed-minded heads, reacting to whatever that little GoB snitch posted here. That seems to be her only talent—it fulfills her somehow... because she didn't actually write a single word about the actual topic itself. Instead, she comes running in here trying to file baseless complaints against others just for her own selfish reasons.

And I wasn't even complaining about that. This whole thing is completely off-topic, sparked by that agitated whistleblower, but my issue is with what was in the title and my introductory paragraph. Read what it's actually about first, and then give me your commentary.

So you're complaining about the moderators in a subforum where they've been totally messing up their jobs for two years straight, and then you act surprised when a bunch of professional trolls spam you with a formal complaint.
Hate to break it to you, but you got exactly what you asked for. 😬

Tyler Garcia69 said:I have a serious grievance regarding the arbitrary deletion of comments within the Coronavirus PDF, specifically under the Mask topic, though this behavior extends broadly across nearly all subjects in that document, and it is being carried out by the moderator known as ego.

Critical commentary is systematically purged, whether it concerns masks or "vaccination." About a month ago, I posted a segment regarding informed consent for this 'vaccination' based on the work of a Swiss physician, including a link to the original foreign text—entirely verifiable and transparent. It vanished in record time. By what authority, and on what grounds, does he delete such entries? This was a text from a physician concerning informed consent. That is information. It is neither misinformation nor a violation of any rules. Such deletions are unjustifiable. Consequently, I was forced to relocate that same text to the Conspiracy Theory thread, even though it has absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories. It is nonsensical. I urge you to instruct him to cease this practice. At the very least, he should provide a reasoned explanation if he perceives an issue with such content. What he is doing is nothing more than blatant censorship.

Then there is the most recent incident yesterday, where he deleted two of my posts under the Mask topic because I commented on a previous entry. That entry alluded to the supposed hypocrisy of V. Sinčić’s representative, who apparently doesn't wear a mask in a grocery store, yet was "caught" wearing one on a plane while flying from Brussels or wherever, because, of course, they have to follow the rules there. I responded by stating that this is precisely the fundamental purpose of those scraps of cloth over our mouths: training obedience. I argued that true protection against what the mass media and politicians constantly scream about would actually require protective gear—specifically a suit equipped with a proper mask similar to a gas mask—and I even provided an image to illustrate. That post, along with another one following it, was deleted, and I was slapped with a one-day ban. Frankly, this is absurd; it is nothing short of irrationality and blatant, arbitrary censorship. I did not state a falsehood; first, it is my personal opinion, and second, it is entirely logical and factually supported. These permeable rags serve no purpose other than conditioning us for compliance (a fact admitted by the so-called crisis headquarters, which is documented in black and white), while simultaneously restricting the breathing essential for life and preventing the expulsion of carbon dioxide, which is equally vital. This has already been proven and supported by various scientific studies, both new and established. Yet, when such a comment is written, he simply deletes it and punishes the author. Is this acceptable to you? If so, then something is fundamentally wrong here. One cannot possibly shunt everything into the Conspiracy Theory thread! Not everything qualifies as a "conspiracy theory," and what I have described certainly does not.

Therefore, I am requesting that you tell him to dial back this arbitrary censorship and the unfounded removal of comments. It is improper. Please accept this as a sharp and legitimate critique of the conduct of moderator ego. As for the other moderators in that PDF, I could actually offer them some praise. Thank you in advance.

Your useless posts are being deleted because the sewer is where waste belongs. Besides, you're talking too much trash...

Linda King said:Link to my previous post:

Putting it in a quote one more time:

Thanks, I love snakes. 😛

And one for this Nazi ragazz too. The rest is on me.

guys, why is your Italian so fluent? Based on how you're acting, you didn't even address her properly. Just stick to American English; don't embarrass yourself. 😵

Arthur Smith15 said:Your posts are getting deleted because they belong in the sewer along with all that trash you're spewing. Honestly, you're just talking nonsense at this point...

Where on earth did you crawl out from, you absolute bottom-feeder?

Maybe they're "nonsense," but hey, you're still sitting here reading them, let's be real. 😉

Matthew Johnson30 said:So, let me get this straight: you spend your time complaining about the mods in a subforum that’s been totally messing up for two years straight, and then you act shocked when a whole swarm of professional trolls vomits an appeal right back in your face?
Hate to break it to you, man, but you basically got exactly what you asked for. 😬

I was fully expecting my complaints and appeals to go nowhere, but I definitely didn't account for this massive tidal wave—or rather, this total dump—of trolls. 😬

ah, fu** 'em 😎

Tyler Garcia69 said:I was fully prepared for some futile objections and complaints, but I certainly didn't anticipate this absolute deluge—this literal tidal wave—of trolls. 😬

ah, fu** 'em 😎

Right. So, in your worldview, everyone—literally everyone else—is driving on the wrong side of the road except for you?
It’s quite an interesting narrative, though it's a pity we’ve already heard it all before.
And then there’s that classic line: "I'm not being antisemitic, but..." 😒
Just remember—when it comes to certain things, such as racism, there is absolutely NO "BUT." If you require specific details on matters where "but" simply does not exist, feel free to consult the Constitution and the Penal Code of the US, and do try to adhere to them while posting here.

There was already a discussion regarding this very topic back when Sky was banned, and I truly believed we had moved past it—that the message had been received, especially since conspiracy theories offer such vast, expansive territory for expression without ever needing to resort to hate speech.
Yet, here you are, throwing a tantrum—not over a mere trifle, but over the deletion of posts—while simultaneously insulting every single person who has the audacity to tell you that you are wrong. 😵
In any case, I appreciate you opening this thread; it serves as a helpful reminder of the boundaries governing our communication, which I shall ensure are strictly observed moving forward.