#1 ·
So, which directors actually defined their respective decades? It’s a difficult question to pin down. Directors release far fewer films than actors, who tend to pop up in dozens of projects within a single decade.
Take Kubrick, for instance. He directed thirteen films—four in the 50s, four in the 60s, two in the 70s, two in the 80s, and one in the 90s. In my view, he owned the 60s. Why? Because Spartak, Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, and The Odyssey carry significantly more weight than his work from the 50s. His pairings in the 70s and 80s might even surpass Lolita and Spartak, but the sheer impact of Dr. Strangelove and The Odyssey secures the win for the 60s.
Then there is Hitchcock. He directed about sixty films spanning from the 20s through the 70s. Personally, I’d say he defined the 40s and 50s. Just an endless parade of masterpieces.
Take Kubrick, for instance. He directed thirteen films—four in the 50s, four in the 60s, two in the 70s, two in the 80s, and one in the 90s. In my view, he owned the 60s. Why? Because Spartak, Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, and The Odyssey carry significantly more weight than his work from the 50s. His pairings in the 70s and 80s might even surpass Lolita and Spartak, but the sheer impact of Dr. Strangelove and The Odyssey secures the win for the 60s.
Then there is Hitchcock. He directed about sixty films spanning from the 20s through the 70s. Personally, I’d say he defined the 40s and 50s. Just an endless parade of masterpieces.