CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Iconic directors who defined their decades

Iconic directors who defined their decades

Started by Harold Fowler3 · · 👁 4 views · 1 reply

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Harold Fowler3Dennis Martin6
Harold Fowler3 Harold Fowler3 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Feb 2021
#1 ·
So, which directors actually defined their respective decades? It’s a difficult question to pin down. Directors release far fewer films than actors, who tend to pop up in dozens of projects within a single decade.

Take Kubrick, for instance. He directed thirteen films—four in the 50s, four in the 60s, two in the 70s, two in the 80s, and one in the 90s. In my view, he owned the 60s. Why? Because Spartak, Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, and The Odyssey carry significantly more weight than his work from the 50s. His pairings in the 70s and 80s might even surpass Lolita and Spartak, but the sheer impact of Dr. Strangelove and The Odyssey secures the win for the 60s.

Then there is Hitchcock. He directed about sixty films spanning from the 20s through the 70s. Personally, I’d say he defined the 40s and 50s. Just an endless parade of masterpieces.
Dennis Martin6 Dennis Martin6 Active Member
55 messages
joined Dec 2005
#2 ·
Harold Fowler3 said:So what about directors defining entire decades? That’s a way tougher call—directors churn out way fewer flicks compared to actors who are popping up in everything for ten years straight.

piece of cake😁

10s - Méliès
20s - Lang
30s - Hawks (?)
40s - Welles
50s - Kurosawa (or Hitchcock)
60s - Kubrick
70s - Herzog
80s - Lynch (or Ruiz)
90s - Wong (or Kore-eda)
00s - Weerasethakul
10s - Lee Chang-dong (?)

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads