Can we please stop with the explicit content on this forum?

This user set their avatar to a picture of a butt just to freak everyone out
Gross

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=8...3&postcount=26

The guy’s introducing himself with his ass; it’s definitely a bit weird—but is it actually offensive?
Look, this whole obsession with boobs, junk, and butts has basically outgrown this forum and become a staple on pretty much every other board out there. It didn't exactly get this popular because of "virtuous" crusades like yours. Honestly, if you want to run this little campaign for purity, you should probably start by banning every thirsty guy and girl from using suggestive avatars first. Until then... just leave the dude's butt alone. 🤷

Sent from my Sony Xperia using Reddit

Is it actually allowed on this forum to set an avatar of... well, genitalia?

Donna Watson65 said:A guy introduces himself with his backside; it’s definitely a bit odd—but is it truly scandalous?
The whole obsession with breasts, butts, and everything in between—which basically outgrew this forum and became a staple everywhere else—didn't exactly gain traction because of some moral crusade or protest like yours. I mean, if you really wanted to run this campaign for virtue, you’d have to start by banning every thirsty person from using suggestive avatars in the first place. Until then... just let a man’s rear end be. 🤷

Sent from my Motorola Moto G using Reddit

👍

Morgan White said:Is it actually allowed to use explicit imagery like that for an avatar on this forum?

I don't think so. Generally speaking, explicit images are only permitted in those specific sub-forums that aren't running any Google ads. I suppose if you were only posting within those particular threads, you might be able to get away with an explicit avatar, but anything outside of that carries the huge risk of getting our entire forum banned by Google. It isn't really about morality or anything like that; it's more about protecting our revenue. 😁

Morgan White said:Is it actually allowed on this forum to use a dick pic as an avatar?

I have to admit, I’ve only just recently crawled my way back into this forum, but if I remember correctly, a ton of those girls used to set their avatars as full-on compilations of their own "work." 🤷

Kenneth Cruz67 said:Not quite. Explicit images are only allowed on specific subforums that don't host Google ads. If you stick strictly to those threads, you could probably get away with an explicit avatar too. But anything outside of that is a massive risk—we can't have Google banning the whole forum. It’s not about being moral; it’s about the money. 😁

See? I told you...
Honestly, what some people call "explicit content"... for me, it’s just... I don't know, it's more like a conceptual metaphor. 🙂

Kenneth Cruz67—I think some people might actually agree with me on this one. 👋

Sent from my Sony Xperia using Reddit

Donna Watson65 said:I have to admit, I’ve only just recently started popping back up on the forums, but if my memory serves me right, I clearly recall plenty of girls using entire collections of those little creative works as their avatars 🤷

Oh, I see how it is....
Still, what some people might label as explicit content feels more like... well, maybe a conceptual metaphor to me 🙂

[Name] I suppose even some folks might actually agree with me there 👋

Sent from my iPhone using Reddit

Honestly, who cares what you call it? It's really just about how Google defines it lol

Looks like our friend here finally decided to ditch that controversial avatar after all the fuss.