Another example of Cuka and Body Halleck's bias :D

Kolega napise ovo:
I can't believe people are still falling for this garbage—it’s honestly pathetic at this point. You guys see what's happening and you just sit there? Seriously? It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck where everyone thinks they’re safe because they aren't the ones on the tracks. The Department of Homeland Security isn't playing games here, and if you think you can just ignore the reality of the situation, you're dead wrong. It's not about "opinion" anymore—it's about facts. Plain and simple. Stop being so naive. It’s exhausting watching the same tired arguments pop up every single day from people who clearly haven't done a lick of research. Get real.

I can't even deal with this—total slave behavior. said:Look, the Department of Homeland Security—specifically that high-level "John Doe" guy—has been faking it for three months straight. Just one. They’re looking at Zalichina’s godmother’s bloodwork just to claim her BAC wasn't 1.1—it was actually 1.34. And even with that media report, it’s totally unclear if that’s what was in her system at the exact moment they drew the blood, or if they’re just extrapolating back to the time of the crash—especially since the cops didn't even pick up the godmother until two hours later.

So I'm asking—does this mean our buddy John Doe spent three whole months working on just one single case? And get this: my comment gets nuked twice, yet this specific post is still sitting here. It was just a regular, normal question—polite as hell, honestly. Can't get any more civil than that.
So, censorship is officially in full swing—apparently, you’re allowed to smear someone all you want, but the second you actually ask a question about it? Boom. Silenced. Typical.

And let’s not forget how Body Halleck is shamelessly sucking up to the moderator again—zero backbone, just total bootlicking.

I’m asking how it's even possible that posts filled with obvious insults aren't getting hit with a ban—especially after they've been reported. Seriously, from what I can see, none of them are actually being taken down.
Give me an example—and I want a direct link to the insult.

Instead of getting any actual, objective answers—you know, like how decent moderators are supposed to handle things—I just get lectured about what Cuka decided is okay to talk about on this board. It’s ridiculous. I asked why there's such blatant double standards, and that's all I get. Total joke.

So here comes the duty officer, Body Halleck—who clearly doesn't give a damn about actually answering the question. He just leans over as far as he can, tells me that the big boss Cuka already said what he had to say (which has zero to do with my actual inquiry, by the way), and then slams the thread shut. Case closed. Typical.

They’re totally screwing over Cuka and Body Halleck. It’s a textbook example of how to be a pathetic moderator or admin.

EDIT:
LMAO!
I can't believe people actually fall for this garbage—it’s honestly embarrassing. You see these "experts" out here spinning absolute nonsense, acting like they have some deep insight, when really they're just shouting into the void to feel important. It’s pure delusion. And don't even get me started on the legal side of things. People think they know how the Department of Homeland Security operates, but they clearly haven't read a single actual regulation. It doesn't work that way—period. They're just grasping at straws to justify their own incompetence. Anyway, stop falling for the hype. It’s all noise.

I can't even deal with this—just absolute nonsense. Seriously, what are we even doing here? It’s all just noise at this point. kaže:
Here it is. Total fat cat bureaucrat. She basically had to tear those kids apart just to get her thread started on this subforum—honestly, that says everything you need to know about her "professionalism."

You watching some surrealist comedy sketch while looking at these losers? Because that’s what this looks like—watching a live broadcast where you’re actually one of the actors they're scripting lives for. 😁

Let’s see if they try to pull the trigger on deleting this comment or slap me with a ban. Deletion? A ban? Not happening. No way. 😁
Oh man, no way—the post is still up and hasn't been nuked yet, but in the meantime, they went ahead and wiped out my actual question. Typical. 😁

Cuka, don't you have even a shred of shame?

Personal attacks against fellow members aren't allowed here and will be penalized.
Criticizing public political figures is permitted—to a certain extent—and won't result in sanctions; though, I honestly find it highly debatable whether calling a "bloated, taxpayer-funded bureaucracy" constitutes an insult or just a brutally realistic description of the situation.

However, repeatedly circling back to the exact same topic after a thread has already been closed? That will absolutely get you sanctioned.

Casey Bennett said:insulting forum members isn't allowed and gets you sanctioned.
Insulting public political figures is fine (to an extent) and won't get you banned. Besides, it’s debatable if calling someone a "bloated bureaucrat" is even an insult or just a dead-on description of who they are.

But circling back to the same topic right after the last thread was locked? Yeah, that’s definitely getting you sanctioned.

What a pathetic excuse.
And just so you know, insulting anyone is against the rules here. It's honestly sad that you don't even know the basic site rules.

Where does it say that insulting public political figures is allowed?

What you just said is embarrassing.
Fine, call them a bureaucrat—but "bloated"? What does weight have to do with what kind of person they are? That's purely just to be insulting. It's unbelievable how the mods and admins act and then try to justify being jerks.

Also, how do you explain me getting a strike for calling someone's statement stupid, while they call my statements moronic and walk away scot-free?
Oh right—double standards. 😁

The ban on insults applies directly to the forum members, whether you personally agree with it or not.

I am simply explaining how the system behind this rule actually operates. I have no interest in commenting on anything else, as politics isn't my subforum and I don't have access to deleted posts anyway.

David Parker93 said:Where exactly does it say we have permission to insult public political figures?
(...)
Seriously—calling someone fat just to be an asshole? Since when does body weight have anything to do with who you are as a person? It’s clearly just a cheap shot intended to offend...

I'm with them on this one.

Not getting involved in anything else...

Casey Bennett said:The rule against insults applies to everyone on this forum—you included. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant.

Look, I'm just laying out how I think the system works. Beyond that—I’ve got nothing to say. Politics isn't my lane and I don't have any insight into what's been deleted. Period.

I'm not even gonna bother responding—it’s not like the rules say anything about that anyway.
I mean, seriously—what kind of pathetic excuse for a forum even allows people to just go around insulting everyone? It’s garbage.