Kenneth Clark18 said:Let’s get real here.
The Olympics prove just how much of a sporting nation someone actually is. Swimming isn't some niche thing nobody watches; it’s one of those expensive sports, highly regarded by the upper crust. Same with equestrian stuff. The Americans—well, let's look at countries like Canada—they chose individual sports, they have centuries of tradition in things we don't even touch, like fencing, and that’s why they’re among the top 10 most successful sporting nations ever. They had heavy hitters in soccer, water polo, handball...
The US is a total powerhouse when you look at medal counts, population size, and both individual and team success. We’ve got medals in all the big team sports. Even in the two biggest sports on the planet, regardless of how much people trash talk our national soccer or basketball teams. How many countries in our tier can pull off that kind of success? Not to mention there are about 150 countries out there with larger populations. Tons of them pour way more money into sports than we do and come up totally empty-handed.
But, honestly, most of these results come down to just being born with freakish, once-in-a-generation talent. We stay relevant in two major team sports where there's maybe one or two elite clubs, zero real investment, and a domestic league that barely exists. The South is a success story, maybe even something like the Lakers or the Bulls. Even the Knicks, as much as they’re a mess this year.
Russia and Romania have basically vanished from the handball scene. And Sweden hasn't been able to recover for like 15 years.
In swimming, we haven't really been in the conversation since the Athens 2004 Olympics. We aren't in track and field—not the 100m, not the 110m hurdles, not the marathon, 3.1 miles, 6.2 miles. To me, that's what real athletics is. People brag about whatever they do in 25-meter pools, and then you have some supposedly "best swimmer" publicly claiming everyone else is doping. There was that whole drama with the uniforms, and the talk about certain people guaranteeing results for their athletes. But you see the reality—Australia, the USA, Brazil, even Zimbabwe is stronger in swimming. They don't even have the infrastructure, yet they produced a medal winner.
As for equestrianism, we have someone who shows up with a trainer and ends up 78th at the Olympics. If we actually bothered to fund a top-tier horse, maybe we'd actually win something, just like the Britons, the Irish, or the Dutch.
We definitely have a tradition in fencing, though.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milan_NeralićI was there, watching the event. 👍
Jamaica is ten times smaller and they absolutely dominate track and field. Don't even get me started on Uruguay, which with only 2.3 million people has two World Cup titles and 14 or 15 Copa America wins. Or Denmark being European champions in soccer. These are all small countries, or similar in size to us.
Canada pulls in 10 or 15 medals at the Summer Games. They have 497 total. They grabbed 15 medals in Rio, and it wasn't just water polo—they've had 10 golds in track through history. Meanwhile, we’re over here winning medals in amateur boxing. 😵
The Czech Republic makes the finals of the Euros in soccer, Portugal is a European Champion, finalists...
There are plenty of tiny countries with incredible results. The truth is, we struggle in team sports. Everyone always talks about how "small" we are, how everyone else is huge, and it just creates these complexes. You're raised being told you belong to a small nation, and it gets in your head.