#21 ·
swiftbear86 said:What’s actually the point of getting a metabolic syndrome diagnosis if we just end up treating every individual issue based on the standard medical guidelines anyway?
Is there some specific set of protocols just for metabolic syndrome, or how does it differ from the usual way things are handled?
I totally get that having a bunch of different risk factors stacked up increases the chances of cardiovascular issues.
Also, does anyone know what the ICD code for metabolic syndrome is?
Where is modern medicine even heading? Metabolic... my foot.
They claim people are getting overweight more often, yet the prerequisite for labeling it "metabolic syndrome" is central obesity... seriously?
Unfortunately, we’re living in a world overflowing with PhDs, associate professors, and various academic elites who seem obsessed with churning out scientific papers on absolutely anything just to cling to their tenured positions. (Honestly, when you dig through the literature, half of them read like, "if a breeze blows on a Saturday, two seniors over 65 will die per 4 million people"—it's all just variations of that nonsense)....
And the absolute worst part? They cite studies that eventually get debunked, but because those flawed results and assumptions spawned hundreds of follow-up papers, they continue to be accepted as gospel. It’s a self-perpetuating cycle of garbage conclusions.
Personally, I don't recognize metabolic syndrome as a valid diagnosis—unless, of course, some Big Pharma company pays me to start acknowledging it.😉