Admin, can we look into how El Niño and Ego are misrepresenting Parsifal's guidance?

I’m going to try to keep this brief here, but I’ll follow up with a much more detailed explanation in my next post regarding this new wave of forum censorship and the blatant unfairness I’ve just run into for the second time.

1. I don't get on the forum as often as I'd like because life in the real world keeps me pretty busy, so I don't always have the time to read or post as much as I want to.

2. While wandering through the various corners of the site today, I stumbled upon an injustice that seems to be becoming a recurring theme for me.

Essentially, my favorite moderator—Ego—has developed a sort of "visionary" delusion 😲 where he thinks he sees hiddenpuma75 everywhere, and he’s actually addressing
a user named nibabanideda

p=39010769#post39010769 (post 9890) believing that this user is actually me, hiddenpuma75.

3. Before long, this moderator-driven hysteria spreads through the inner circles of the site, and now El Niño is having his own "visions," claiming that the "demon" hiddenpuma75 is appearing in the science threads.😲

(post 9881)

And both moderators, caught up in their own self-assured delusions,
are abusing their positions to ban nibabanideda, purely out of a petty, hypocritical desire to target someone they simply don't like.

5. That user, nibabanideda, actually tried to appeal this on this thread

t=716972
but nobody responded. It seems that censoring users based on personal vendettas has become such a daily occurrence here that everyone just ignores it, which is honestly a sad state of affairs for the intellectual atmosphere of this community.

(By the way—I’m sure 19 out of 20 moderators would swear under oath in a US courtroom that they are staunch liberals and champions of free speech, yet strangely enough, they go silent on the forum whenever their colleagues
start censoring ideas and individuals simply because they find them personally distasteful.

6) I’m proposing a very simple solution that will prove my point
and show that I am definitely not the user nibabanideda.🙄

7) I’m asking any administrator who has even a shred of sympathy for my situation
—and perhaps a little detective curiosity or intelligence—to please try to contact nibabanideda via email.
He is the key to debunking these false visions and proving that El Niño and Ego are hallucinating when they accuse innocent users of being
hiddenpuma75.

8) If possible, could someone send me nibabanideda's email address so I can reach out? I’m genuinely curious to meet the person who has been falsely accused of sharing my "ignorance" and who is suffering a similar fate of being silenced on this forum.

9). Of course, I also ask that nibabanideda reaches out to me, or if anyone knows him, please put him in touch with me via private message.

10) Please take note of one simple fact: moderators El Niño and Ego have zero actual proof that nibabanideda and hiddenpuma75 are the same person. They have moved to a whole new level of censorship—one based on pure assumption—where they begin banning people simply because they hold similar viewpoints.😲 🙄

In this situation, Occam's razor works perfectly—the simplest explanation is usually the right one.
Just ask yourselves: which scenario is more plausible?

a) That El Niño and Ego simply made a mistake, acting on faulty moderation data, and accidentally swapped my identity with another user who happens to share my views.
In that case, two people are being unfairly targeted...

b)
Or that I’ve pulled some incredibly convoluted stunt where I'm somehow posting under two different accounts simultaneously.
Honestly, why would I bother using a clone account over in the Science forum when I haven't even been banned there?

It's worth noting that the administrator Ego and the moderator El Niño are making accusations without providing any actual proof.
I know for a fact they are mistaken and operating on incorrect information; knowing that gives me a real sense of peace and confidence.🙂

My only issue is that I can't prove it unless an administrator takes the time to actually investigate this. A proper review would reveal the true nature of how El Niño and Ego handle moderation.

A quick check of the IP addresses would easily show that it's physically impossible for me to be in two places at once.

I’ve put together some suggestions and evidence that should be pretty easy to verify if anyone takes a moment to dig through the previous posts by hiddenpuma75 and nibabanideda.

I’ve spent some time looking over the posts from nibabanideda—the guy who was censored and banned, and who is being falsely and unfairly accused of being me,
hiddenpuma75

1. The guy writes using a heavy Midwestern dialect.

Hey everyone, look, I’m a Southerner.
That Midwestern slang just feels totally foreign and honestly kind of ridiculous to me. I wouldn't pick up those speech patterns even if I were offered a million bucks.
Even their little filler words sound bizarre to me.
(Please don't take offense; I know how sensitive people can get about their regional accents, but to me, certain expressions just feel wrong.) 😁

I remember a few years back when a famous actor was criticized because he made a somewhat clumsy comment regarding that specific way of speaking.

But I completely get where he was coming from, and I’d say the exact same thing. Please try to see it this way:

To my ears, that dialect sounds harsh and clunky—kind of like how I might perceive German—whereas something like Spanish sounds melodic and beautiful.
There’s really nothing to be angry about when I tell someone that their local accent doesn't have the same lyrical flow as Italian or Spanish. 🙂

By the way, I’ve never used any of those regionalisms myself; I always stick to standard English.

More evidence of a truly "brilliant" administrator

2. nibabanideda claims I've been posting about politics, but hiddenpuma75 definitely hasn't! 😉

It’s actually quite simple to set the record straight: neither I, nor my handle hiddenpuma75, have ever engaged in political discussions. Not ten years ago, and certainly not today.
I firmly believe—and live by this—that obsessing over, analyzing, or even touching politics is just bad for a person's mental and spiritual well-being.

To analyze, comment on, and
worry about that stinking swamp filled with shrieking rats and crocodiles is something I actively avoid, and honestly, I’d recommend everyone else do the same.

So, I see this as yet more subtle proof that hiddenpuma75 isn't the incompetent one they claim. It seems EL Ninho and Nick ego are just suffering from delusions about me, likely because my actual ideas are making their lives difficult. 😉

3. Now, I can't provide physical proof of this, but I will say this: I would be absolutely thrilled if I could have churned out 153 posts as fast as nibabanideda did before he was unfairly banned under some baseless, inquisitorial accusation.

I simply don't have the luxury of spending my time rambling all over this forum; my real-life responsibilities take priority.
In fact, I've been drafting and putting this response together for days now, ever since I heard about these fraudulent moderator decrees —I just haven't had the bandwidth to get to it sooner.

4. Just another personal observation proving I’m not just some random nobody on this board.

If you take a moment to look back through some of that amateur's posts, you'll notice he's constantly talking about things he watches on TV.

As for me—the one and only hiddenpuma75 🙂—I haven't really followed television for years now.😲(It wasn't an overnight thing; it was a gradual process where TV only happens to me by accident or when I simply can't avoid it.)

Honestly, cutting out TV leads to such mental clarity and a wonderful sense of freedom.🙂

I actually recently read that the famous actor Tim Robbins (the brilliant guy from Shawshank Redemption 🙂)
mentioned he hasn't watched TV in three years. He claims it has actually lowered the level of aggressive thoughts in his life.

Avoiding TV is a truly liberating experience, and I can't recommend it enough to anyone.

It’s incredibly easy for moderators to be unfair, but it takes a hell of a lot of work to expose that bias and fight back.

I’ve found myself facing this exact same situation for the second time now.😲

At this link, you can see my direct question to the administration—a question they completely ignored, even though it was posted in a thread where they really ought to be providing clear answers to the community.

I am calling on the administration and the site owner—someone who actually values fairness and has the patience to look into this—to step in. We need to put an end to moderator overreach and those biased bans
that stem from nothing more than PERSONAL VENDETTAS or some new kind of digital Inquisition based on fabricated accusations.🙄

I’m asking the admin team to take a hard look at the ROOT of this issue.
The whole thing falls apart because the very first step taken was flawed.
Take my situation, for example—I was unfairly partially banned from the religion sub-forum.

Because that initial mistake was allowed to stand, it paved the way for an even worse, equally unjust action

And now, we’re seeing other users being banned simply because they share similar viewpoints to mine. 😲
It’s essentially an intellectual crime: censoring ideas just because a moderator doesn't personally care for them.

We’ve basically landed in a cycle of personal vendettas, misleading directions, and total silence from the administration.

Kudos to the team for such "creative" work—it feels like a coordinated effort to stifle thought on this forum. 👏

The partial ban on religious topics is a textbook case of censorship and nothing more than the personal grudge held by the moderator, Nick ego, against my views and philosophies which just don't align with his worldview.

1) The reality is that I was an active contributor here back in 2008 and 2009 without a single issue. Even after 2008, I continued to participate using the exact same style, but since the change in moderation, I’ve faced targeted censorship and a selective ban on discussing religion.
The sheer fact that everything was perfectly fine until 2008/2009 proves this is pure discrimination and nothing but an exercise of arbitrary power by Nick ego.
This bias feels especially egregious because this very same moderator, Nick ego, openly writes about how if he ever held political office, he would push for such extreme liberalization of the laws that even incestuous marriages between siblings or parents and children would be permitted.😲 🙄


Yet, according to the ultra-liberal moderator Nick ego in the forum lounge, my writing is such a horrific crime that it deserves a permanent ban and strict censorship.

(I loooove it 😂 )

and I cry

while thinking about the other moderators who just sit there watching this happen in silence, probably afraid to offend their little buddy in the lounge.😉

If you ask them, every single moderator claims to be a staunch liberal and a progressive; they all claim to stand for justice and oppose dictators, censorship, the church, corrupt politicians, taxes, recessions, and even slow loading speeds on the forum...

But wouldn't you know it! Those grand principles seem to vanish the moment they step into the very forums they moderate.😉

Give anyone power—whether it's running a country or just managing a web forum—and you quickly see what kind of parent, politician, or leader they truly are, 😉 especially when they face zero consequences for any injustice they commit.😉

2) It is honestly sad to see a public forum discriminate against writers who have contributed to discussions for years (I've started over 300 threads!) simply to censor ideas that a certain moderator finds distasteful.
This goes against the entire spirit of this community and flies in the face of those famous Volterov guidelines for moderators:

"I may disagree with your ideas, but I will do everything in my power to ensure you have the freedom to express them."

I’m fairly convinced that the certain Aries13 we see here——is definitely Parsifal. If you actually take the time to follow the thread, the evidence is right there:

Now, it sometimes feels like a few other users are mimicking Parsifal too, but I don't think that's just some weird coincidence anymore. Honestly, I blame Deepak Chopra and his whole crowd; they've indoctrinated a massive number of people. So, poor Parsifal isn't some lone wolf thinking exactly like that gentleman.
Take that discussion I mentioned above, for instance—it is practically identical to what's laid out in the Chopra-Mlodinow book, *clash of worldviews*. It led me to the conclusion that we're looking at clones of these two authors. Specifically, I'm talking about Aries13 and Wand_1. 😁

p.s.

One more thing that's got me scratching my head: this page claims Parsifal is more of a partial ban to us??