CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online
log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Moderator bias: Is it real?

Moderator bias: Is it real?

Started by Nicholas Watson · · 👁 5 views · 70 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nicholas Watsonlonebadger6ironranger67Paul Thomas46Rachel RichardsonPatrick Wright2rustydrifter10Morgan Rodriguez57William Bennett53briskbison55northernsailor8Ryan Gomez4bluemason3Douglas Hughesredbear2crimsonjackal63Sophia Thomas7Thomas Morgan67Benjamin Reyes52Richard Nelson84
Thomas Morgan67 Thomas Morgan67 Member
11 messages
joined Jan 2018
#61 ·
Kimberly White63 said:But how do you even decide who counts as neutral? Take me, for example—on the political spectrum, conservatives label me a liberal, while liberals just see me as a conservative.🤷

That’s a great point. It shows you're actually trying to look at things through a more realistic lens than those people who let their emotions drive them, strictly following the ideological boxes they've been shoved into.

Let's be honest, though: at the end of the day, ideology is what ultimately shapes and defines a person.
Benjamin Reyes52 Benjamin Reyes52 Member
43 messages
joined Feb 2012
#62 ·
Because of this one post, I ended up getting slapped with a red flag for racism.

Clone. said:Dear Benjamin Reyes52,

You have received an infraction on Reddit.

The reason? Racism.
-------

-------

This violation carries a 35-point penalty and could lead to a temporary account suspension until the term ends. Please be aware that serious offenses are permanent and will never expire.

Original Post:
I’ve been thinking about this quite a bit lately. Is there anything more frustrating than watching a complete lack of accountability play out right before our eyes? It feels like we're stuck in a loop where the people in charge make massive mistakes, yet somehow, they always walk away unscathed while everyone else picks up the pieces. How does this even happen? How can a system designed to protect the public end up being used as a shield for incompetence? It’s maddening. You see these decisions being made—decisions that clearly ignore common sense—and then you watch the fallout. And what do we get in return? Nothing. No apologies, no resignations, just more of the same. It makes you wonder: who is actually looking out for us? When the institutions meant to serve the citizens become nothing more than a way to preserve status quo interests, what's left? We talk about progress and reform constantly, but without real consequences for those at the top, isn't all that talk just empty noise? I truly believe we need to demand more, because if we don't, this cycle will just keep spinning forever.
America truly is a multicultural nation, and honestly, it works perfectly here.
I’ve seen enough. Just reading this one part—from that [Reddit post](https://www.reddit.com/r/quote)—is more than enough to make my point.

Quote:
Flower Senta from the Center for Peace Studies shared her thoughts on this.
Quote:
By Elvir Mešanović
So, these are our "opinion makers," right? They get to decide what counts as a scandalous statement, and I’m just supposed to nod along? Fine. I’ll accept their judgment—but I’ll do it while looking at my fellow American, Ladislav Ilčić, with nothing but pure contempt. Is he really trying to create this atmosphere of persecution? Because that's exactly what he's doing.
All the best,
Reddit


This is the final post from our politics moderator.
DJTcro The user said:Alibegovic and Hasanbegovic. 🙂

If you look at those last names, it’s almost like looking at the roster for the Livno Canton Government in the Ten Cantons.

And that canton isn't even located in Central Europe.


Look, we aren’t here to count blood cells on this forum. We have had an incredibly strict moderation policy in place for a long time now: zero tolerance for even the slightest hint of targeting someone based on their nationality. Whether it's through their name, their statements, or their character, if you're using their background as a way to drag them down in a negative context, you're out. Want to tear apart what they said? Go for it. Want to debate their writing? Absolutely. You can even get a little snarky or go full-on savage when criticizing a public figure—do whatever you want. But leave their heritage out of it. It really isn't that hard to remember.

This is the response from the Pizvo politics moderator regarding my appeal.

Everything is perfectly clear.

And with that, I’ll say goodbye. Consider this my final word. Don't bother looking for me anymore.
Richard Nelson84 Richard Nelson84 Member
26 messages
joined Aug 2013
#63 ·
redbear2 said:Look, I'll be blunt: I find it hard to take this whole idea of being open seriously. My impression is that most complaints aren't even taken seriously to begin with. By definition, a complaint comes from a totally different perspective than the moderator handing out the penalty. Honestly, there have been several times when moderators didn't even explain their reasoning to me. Even when they did try, I proved them wrong, and then I was just labeled "rude" and ignored. I've also been told my appeals won't even be looked at unless I act polite. That is the exact opposite of critical thinking and being analytical! If someone is right, their attitude doesn't matter. Pointing fingers at "rudeness" feels like an emotional reaction used when there are no actual arguments left. Don't you think?

It’s honestly tough for me to take a user seriously when they have dozens of pages of penalties and constantly file partial appeals on PZK for every single thing. You're one of those users who thinks people are targeting you personally or picking on you. And don't even get me started on those incredibly tasteless public appeals. It's nearly impossible to have a normal conversation with people like that. I think that's the real issue nobody talks about here; my gut tells me the "troublemakers" are the ones complaining while the silent majority just follows the rules. I used to be an "average" user once, too, and I'll admit I sometimes felt like moderators were on a personal vendetta. But once I became a moderator, I realized that almost never happens. Seriously, moderators deserve credit for the time they spend making this place a better community. That's why I believe most complaints are baseless—moderators really do try to be fair and professional.
Nicholas Watson Nicholas Watson Active MemberOP
106 messages
joined Feb 2014
#64 ·
Honestly, it’s pretty impressive you actually carved out some time and energy to weigh in from your neck of the woods. I’m pretty much on board with just about everything you said here 🙂

It actually brings a specific little story to mind.
I remember this woman once saying, "When I first got married, I was convinced all mothers-in-law were just naturally wicked and responsible for every single problem in the house. But now that my son is hitched, I'm starting to realize the daughters-in-law aren't exactly saints either."
redbear2 redbear2 Active Member
84 messages
joined Oct 2014
#65 ·
Richard Nelson84 said:It’s tough for me to take someone seriously when they have dozens of pages of posts and a handful of warnings, yet constantly complain on PZK about every single strike or whatever else happens. You seem to be one of those users who thinks bans are personal vendettas or just targeted harassment. Not to mention the way those appeals are handled—it can be pretty tacky. It makes normal conversation nearly impossible. And I think that's the real issue being ignored here; I get the impression the "troublemakers" are always the ones complaining while the quiet majority just follows the rules. I used to be an ordinary user myself, and sure, sometimes it felt like the mods were out to get me. But once I stepped into a moderator role, I realized that’s almost never the case. Honestly, the mods deserve credit for the time they put in to make this place a better community. Most of these complaints feel baseless because the mods actually try to be fair and professional.

Fair enough. My opinion must be invalid since I have a few warnings and a long post history, whereas you were just a regular guy before becoming a moderator.

My apologies to everyone for even bringing this up. I’m starting to think I completely misunderstood the point of this thread.
Nicholas Watson Nicholas Watson Active MemberOP
106 messages
joined Feb 2014
#66 ·
Kimberly White63 said:Right here. So, I was looking over the rules for picking out a username, and honestly, it doesn't explicitly say you can't do certain things—it’s just kind of open-ended. That being said, we can always tweak the guidelines and add some extra fine print whenever we feel like it if something weird pops up. 😉 My personal take? Yeah, absolutely not.

I mean, I’m pretty sure we actually agreed on this back then—that handles like that are basically hovering on the edge of hate speech.

Maybe someone from the admin team could weigh in on this?
Ryan Gomez4 Ryan Gomez4 Active Member
112 messages
joined Feb 2013
#67 ·
Nicholas Watson said:She actually agreed with me back then—usernames like that are basically bordering on hate speech.

Can an admin weigh in here?

It’s not overt hate speech, but implicitly? Yeah, it definitely could be.
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#68 ·
It seems Nice is currently preoccupied with managing user handles, and since she isn't online at the moment, the rest of us have been relatively quiet. I can only say that whenever I notice a username, an avatar, or a user cut that looks off, I tend to do exactly what she should be doing: I send her a quick note to let her know so she can take a look. In fact, thanks to my own initiative, we’ve already managed to address several such issues through a few interventions.
Nicholas Watson Nicholas Watson Active MemberOP
106 messages
joined Feb 2014
#69 ·
Look, I wouldn't even be bothering everyone with this if I hadn't already filed a formal report on this guy ages ago, and I mean like, a long time ago

edit
Since you guys actually seem to have the willpower to address these questions, I figured I’d throw one more into the ring just to see if we can get some actual answers out of this
Do you guys follow some kind of internal playbook when it comes to how mods should handle a user like this when they pop up in a thread, or is it mostly just a "wing it and see what happens" type of situation?
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#70 ·
As I mentioned before, we have a dedicated thread specifically for administrative interventions where you should post. Alternatively, feel free to reach out via private message.
Nicholas Watson Nicholas Watson Active MemberOP
106 messages
joined Feb 2014
#71 ·
I know it probably looks like my questions are totally off-topic right now, but I swear they’re actually connected. It’s just going to take me a few more posts to finally get my point across, so bear with me. Once I've laid out the full picture, I'll just move over to PMs—which I've already requested—so I don't end up cluttering this thread any further.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads