CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Formula 1 › Formula 1 United States Grand Prix 2015 (Los Angeles - Central Park) 03/15/2015

Formula 1 United States Grand Prix 2015 (Los Angeles - Central Park) 03/15/2015

Started by darkmarlin16 · · 👁 17 views · 474 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants darkmarlin16jadeseal7Drew Bennett68Timothy Castillo6Frank Collins85silvergull10steelmaker83Jason Campbell70briskhound76Mark Ruiz8shadowstag10graniteharbor502neonpuma7mellowtiger83Terry Carter2vividlynx68cosmiccyclist8stormybadger8swiftmaker12ruggedhawk20crimsonstag84rowdyrider12wanderingharbor492Samuel Ruiz4 …
Tyler Bennett5 Tyler Bennett5 Active Member
149 messages
joined May 2019
#441 ·
The first race of the season is officially in the books, and I have to say, I’m feeling pretty good about Williams.
They're actually closing the gap to Ferrari more effectively than they did after the season opener last year.
And considering where they ended up after that final race of the previous season, that's a massive step forward.
On top of that, we're looking at a shift in the driver lineup too—Ferrari had Alonso last year, but now they've got Vettel.
Michael Jackson10 Michael Jackson10 Active Member
140 messages
joined Feb 2023
#442 ·
Between this ridiculous grid and how Red Bull is basically spinning their wheels, if they don't change the rules to actually level the playing field, I honestly think we're looking at the twilight of the F1 I used to love.
I don't watch F1 just to spend days crunching data from car computers, obsessing over tactics and "what if" scenarios, or running imaginary simulations of how every car would perform under "perfect conditions" just to find the "real" winners.
Look, I get it—the younger crowd loves staring at tablets and laptops, running "what if" models, waiting for some software patch for the main sensor or the right-side mirror, or checking for new steering wheel drivers... but for me, this isn't racing anymore. It’s not about the best cars, the best drivers, or even the coolest sponsors. It feels more like a college engineering competition to see who picked a faulty processor or whose battery specs are slightly off. Throw in these tire strategies programmed to fail at a specific lap—which feels like a relic from an era where it actually served a purpose—plus those mindless video game tracks? The soul is gone. For the first time ever, I couldn't even finish watching a race. After a few laps, there were just enough cars left for everyone to grab some points, and half of them were names I'd never even heard of. Honestly, I feel old.

The old school is dead. You used to watch high-octane teams risking everything in basically equal machinery (especially back when most of the grid was running the same Cosworth engines). The order changed because of overtakes, not because someone pressed a button on a remote in the pits. Nobody drove just to aim for tenth place; the big stars were the ones pulling off the most daring passes, and they didn't give a damn about a 2% margin in the pits.
I miss simply watching the cars, the drivers, and their pure skill. When they cross the line, you know the result and that's it. No post-race corrections, no penalties, no engine count drama, no tire complaints, no bullshit. You watch the race and you're done.

In a desperate attempt to create drama and kill off dominance, they've scrambled the rules so much that nobody even knows if they'll reach the finish line. Meanwhile, the least bad team is almost guaranteed to lead, cruising around the track at a strictly programmed rhythm. It's pathetic.
They actually had a cheap and reliable way to kill the monotony back when the cars were still relatively classic. It was a trick borrowed from the old DTM days: a weight handicap for the leaders. So, go ahead, take first or second place... then in the next race, if you're actually good, try fighting through the field with a heavier car. You might finish high, but you won't dominate.

Instead, modern F1 is just a hybrid mess, practically one step away from becoming Formula E. In almost every other type of racing, if one manufacturer dominates, everyone else eventually stops showing up. Everything has become either too predictable or too chaotic, and driver skill is the least important factor. Their drive, their ambition? It's all pre-programmed. These drivers are just neutered robots being activated by remote control.
With this season, I'm officially out. I can't follow something that claims to be the evolution of a legendary sport—the kind of sport where you'd put up posters and collect cards. Personally, I don't know a single teenager who is obsessed with F1 and has actually sat through a full race.
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#443 ·
Michael Jackson10 said:I don't know a single teenager in my life who actually digs F1, let alone someone who’s sat through an entire race from start to finish..

Then you clearly haven't met darkmarlin16, rowdyrider12, or dmw 😁
I actually know kids in real life who are more obsessed with F1 than most of the crowd on here 😬
And just look at this kid...he’s out here watching even the practice sessions 😉
jadeseal7 jadeseal7 Active Member
169 messages
joined Dec 2013
#444 ·
You really just need to dig through the very first threads in this PDF—scroll back to somewhere around 2002 or 2003... You'll find all those old complaints about how drivers can't handle anything without Traction Control, or how the cars have basically become nothing more than computers on wheels. It’s funny, really—the same endless whining, just repackaged for a new era. Nowadays, people are constantly mourning the 2003 season, claiming the cars were faster and the drivers were much more skilled back then. But if you look even further back, they were saying the exact same thing about 2003 in the decade prior, and before that, they were obsessed with 1993 because Williams was dominating everyone with their advanced computer systems and active suspension... honestly, what can you even say? The dogs bark, but the caravan keeps moving. 😁
darkmarlin16 darkmarlin16 VeteranOP
1K messages
joined Nov 2015
#445 ·
stormybadger8 said:Well then you should go hang out with darkmarlin16, Michael Jackson10, and dmw 😁
I actually know some kids in real life who are way more obsessed with F1 than this whole bunch of you guys here 😬
And look at this one kid...he’s even watching replays 😉

I have absolutely no clue what any of this has to do with me?
Christian Harris11 Christian Harris11 Member
11 messages
joined Jul 2014
#446 ·
I’ve been following F1 pretty consistently since back in 2004, though I'm definitely a bit older than most of the crowd here. It seems like there are so many young fans sharing their takes lately, and I sometimes find myself wondering what's actually so thrilling about watching people drive in circles for ninety minutes at a time.
rowdyrider12 rowdyrider12 Member
39 messages
joined Mar 2015
#447 ·
darkmarlin16 said:I'm really not sure how I could possibly be involved in this?


Could it perhaps be the hair? 🙂
mellowtiger83 mellowtiger83 Regular
466 messages
joined Aug 2014
#448 ·
Tyler Bennett5 said:The season opener just wrapped up, and frankly, I’m quite pleased with Williams.
They aren't trailing Ferrari nearly as much as they were after the first race last year.
And we all saw where they ended up by the final race of the previous season.
Furthermore, Ferrari had Alonso last year, whereas this year they have Vettel.

Are we really talking about the same Alonso who was stuck behind Petrov with a championship title already in his pocket???
graniteharbor502 graniteharbor502 Regular
443 messages
joined Apr 2016
#449 ·
Tyler Bennett5 said:On top of all that, Ferrari had Alonso on the roster last season, whereas this year they’ve brought in Vettel.

It really just provides yet another compelling reason to favor Ferrari 🙂
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#450 ·
darkmarlin16 said:not sure how this involves me?

You're involved because you're young...
This guy claims younger generations don't care about F1 at all—that kids won't even sit through a full race..
And from what I can tell, you aren't exactly a teenager anymore, though you're probably in your early twenties...
Plus, let's be real, you aren't the type to skip a single race. In fact, I'd bet you haven't missed one in the last 7 or 8 seasons... and it's not just the races, you're watching qualifying, FP1, FP2, FP3...

So yeah, you're the perfect example proving his "everything is doomed" theory wrong.🙂
darkmarlin16 darkmarlin16 VeteranOP
1K messages
joined Nov 2015
#451 ·
It’s not even close, we’re looking at 14, 15, not 7 or 8
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#452 ·
Interesting stuff...
Hamilton vs Vettel comparison...

Vettel spent the first 21 laps stuck behind Massa, which means he was basically driving at Massa's pace... and that cost him 17 seconds compared to Hamilton.
As soon as Massa cleared out, Vettel could finally floor it. He managed to shave 3 seconds off Hamilton's lead in just 8 laps. On top of that, they both hit the pits, where the Mercedes crew was about half a second faster than Ferrari...
Then, from lap 30 onwards, Vettel was basically just managing the gap to Massa. Massa was about 4 seconds behind him at lap 30 and held that position all the way to the final lap, where Vettel dropped off again with a noticeably slower lap (about 2 seconds slower than his pace ten laps earlier)...

So, the actual gap between Hamilton and Vettel from lap 21 to 57 is only 15 seconds. That’s really not as massive as it looks, especially since Vettel had zero reason to push for fast laps after lap 30...
Basically, he lost more ground in those first twenty laps than he did from lap 21 until the finish line....
During those 36 laps where Vettel wasn't babysitting Massa, his average deficit to Hamilton was only about 0.4 seconds per lap...
So, when Toto Wolff says Ferrari might actually catch them during the season, it doesn't sound crazy. Vettel wasn't actually as far behind as it seems at first glance. 🤔
mellowtiger83 mellowtiger83 Regular
466 messages
joined Aug 2014
#453 ·
Finally, a sensible take. Bravo, tbh. This is what actual analysis looks like—following the flow with some genuine insight, rather than those people who just glance at the final standings and the gaps to draw their conclusions.
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#454 ·
There's one more thing...
It feels like after these first four races, almost everyone had to choose between the soft and supersoft compounds. 😁
Looks like Goodyear really messed up the tire situation... I recall last year in Los Angeles it was a soft/medium choice, but nobody besides a single Sauber 🤔 went with just one pitstop. This year? Almost everyone did.
Kimi, Hulk, and I think Ericsson were doing their own thing with the tires under the SC, so maybe he even pitted three times... but everyone else stuck to one stop without any tire issues at all.

So, it seems the tires are lasting even better than last year, which is definitely going to lead to people leaning heavily on the supersofts.
And that’s where Germany could face a massive deficit. 😁
Basically, they haven't even completed a single lap on the SS. As far as I know, they haven't used them in a single test, and that could really screw them over in future GP weekends...
rowdyrider12 rowdyrider12 Member
39 messages
joined Mar 2015
#455 ·
If they can just manage to nail a single race—actually figure out what they messed up (assuming there was an error to begin with)—then perhaps we might see them back in that one-two formation again...
Michael Jackson10 Michael Jackson10 Active Member
140 messages
joined Feb 2023
#456 ·
stormybadger8 said:So the gap between Hamilton and Vettel from lap 21 to 57 is only 15 seconds, which isn't even that crazy, especially since Vettel had zero reason to go on a tear after lap 30...
therefore he actually blew it more during those first twenty laps than he did from lap 21 until the finish line....
And those 36 laps where Vettel didn't have to stay glued to Massa's bumper average out to about a 0.4 second gap per lap behind Hamilton...
So when Toto Wolff says Ferrari could catch them over the course of the season, it doesn't sound totally insane. Vettel wasn't really as far off as it looks at first glance 🤔

Bravo for the analysis, however you want to slice it...
Only one variable just flew into your equation, and it's pretty arbitrary:
You say "Vettel had zero reason to go on a tear after lap 30..."
and based on that, you conclude that Hamilton isn't actually untouchable. OK, sure, some random thing might happen during the season, but what reason would Mercedes or Hamilton have to push for fast laps while they're totally controlling the race?
According to this logic, it makes it look like Hamilton was driving right at the limit, while Vettel just, I don't know, didn't feel like it because he was already down so much, so he just showed he could be faster if he wanted to.
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#457 ·
Michael Jackson10 said:Nice analysis, if you can even call it that...
The problem is you're working with a totally arbitrary variable here:
You claim "Sebastian Vettel had no reason to go on a tear of fast laps after lap 30..."
And based on that, you're deciding Lewis Hamilton isn't actually that untouchable. Look, sure, some chaos will happen during the season, but why on earth would Mercedes or Hamilton bother smashing lap records when they're already cruising to a win?
According to this logic, Hamilton was driving at his absolute limit, while Sebastian just didn't feel like trying because he was already behind, so he just showed off a little bit instead.

Lewis Hamilton probably wasn't even at his max either, but he was definitely driving at Nico Rosberg's max. 😉
I mean, Rosberg spent the whole time chasing him. It's a different story entirely that he was controlling the race like Sebastian Vettel and Felipe Massa...
How much faster Lewis Hamilton can actually go is anyone's guess, but we know for certain that Rosberg can't go any faster than this. 😁
Therefore, expect Ferrari to dump Rosberg from Second Place pretty soon if nothing else happens...
Michael Jackson10 Michael Jackson10 Active Member
140 messages
joined Feb 2023
#458 ·
stormybadger8 said:Honestly, I don't even think Lewis Hamilton was pushing his absolute limit there. It felt more like he was just driving at Nico Rosberg's maximum level. Makes you wonder, doesn't it? 😉
I mean, Rosberg was basically breathing down Hamilton's neck the entire time, right? But that's one thing—it’s a whole different story when he starts playing puppet master like Vettel did to Massa.
How much faster can Hamilton actually go? Honestly, there's no way to tell from this alone, but one thing is for sure: Rosberg definitely isn't going any faster than him. 😁
So, you gotta expect that if nothing else happens, Ferrari is gonna bump Rosberg down from Second Place pretty soon...

Honestly, looking at those lap times, Nico Rosberg doesn't even need to push any harder to keep Sebastian Vettel at bay. He was consistently under 1:33 during the first half of the race, then dropped below 1:32 in the second half. Easy work, right?
So, we can pretty much say he was cruising at the same pace Vettel used to hit back when he was actually showing everyone what he was capable of.

I wouldn't be so quick to judge when it comes to anyone's limits. Who really knows what would've happened if Hamilton needed to push harder or if Rosberg had just been given a bit more breathing room?
Look, we all know a great driver can pull a rabbit out of a hat and make up for a subpar car, but you can't run that strategy forever. It’s basically Achilles versus a tortoise at this point. Ferrari will find it way easier to close the gap right now because they're hitting those low-hanging technological gains, but once they do, they're going to hit that wall where every tiny improvement requires massive effort. Meanwhile, Mercedes isn't just sitting around twiddling their thumbs; they still have plenty of headroom to make jumps in performance. We might end up with a tighter field—if we're lucky—but it doesn't mean the hierarchy just flips overnight. Both Ferrari and everyone else need to save some development potential for later, otherwise, they'll just end up stuck in a dead zone.
Well, I’ll be damned... just wait until you see this!
Jason Campbell70 Jason Campbell70 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2017
#459 ·
stormybadger8 said:So, when Toto suggests Ferrari might actually catch up during the season, it doesn't sound that crazy. Sebastian Vettel wasn't really as far off as it looks at first glance. 🤔


Mercedes has a car that is a full second faster than the rest of the field.

And that's a second that Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg have to fight tooth and nail to make up for.

Toto is talking nonsense.
Of course he is. He just doesn't want the FIA to go around changing the rules on them.
Amanda Kelly Amanda Kelly Regular
360 messages
joined Mar 2008
#460 ·
stormybadger8 said:Lewis Hamilton probably wasn't even driving at his absolute limit; he was just driving at Nico Rosberg's limit. 😉
Rosberg spent the whole race chasing him, but there's a massive difference between chasing someone and being completely toyed with, like Vettel and Massa...
How much faster Hamilton could actually go is anyone's guess, but we know for sure Rosberg can't go any faster than this. 😁
Therefore, you should expect Ferrari to dump Rosberg from Second Place pretty soon if they want to shake things up...

The gap Lewis had over Rosberg during the race wasn't exactly comfortable or even particularly large. Honestly, I’d call it razor-thin.
It’s the kind of lead you lose in a single heartbeat with one tiny mistake in a corner.
And I didn't see him making any real effort to stretch it out.

So,
it's either:
a) Hamilton is so supremely confident that he didn't feel the need to push harder, figuring he could easily reclaim the lead if he messed up. He's got nerves of steel and was basically playing games with Rosberg all race long.
b) He wanted to pull away, but he just couldn't find the pace to get a 5 or 6-second cushion, which would have been more convincing, IMO.

My money is on B.
But man, I’d love it if it were A. 🙏

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads