CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Politician threatens "gangbang" if Republicans take power. Is this acceptable rhetoric?

Politician threatens "gangbang" if Republicans take power. Is this acceptable rhetoric?

Started by northerntiger · · 👁 4 views · 7 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants northerntigerWilliam Bennett53William Gonzalez3Keith Miller30
northerntiger northerntiger MemberOP
39 messages
joined Jan 2010
#1 ·
A user who openly admits to being a Republican has been threatening people who disagree with him. He keeps talking about a massive "Gangbang" once his party takes back power.

The guy actually targeted me directly. For reasons known only to him, he singled me out and made it crystal clear what he has planned for me.

an 'end' is my dear friend's lovely quote about all those 'key levers of power' that will eventually land in the hands of the one guy who knows everything. Between the Soros-funded NGOs, the media, and all these other 'tribes'—to use your own word, Samwell—it’s basically just one big United States intelligence operation.

So—grab your popcorn, folks.
You haven't seen anything yet when it comes to the coming Gangbang
. I'm telling you—this is just the beginning. Next time...

This was posted on Saturday, the political mods did absolutely nothing, so now I'm escalating this to higher management.

Is it really okay in America—where mass sexual violence was used as a weapon of war by domestic terrorists—to allow this kind of rhetoric?

Did it even cross your minds that I am genuinely starting to feel unsafe? This guy clearly has some serious issues, constantly making violent threats toward everyone whenever "his people" get back into office.

Has it occurred to you to give him a permanent ban for using such violent language? Maybe you should even report him to the authorities so they can ask why his go-to move in online arguments with strangers involves sexual assault—especially when he's talking to women.

Reddit has more readers than most newspapers. You guys are a major hub for information, which means you carry responsibility. And one of those responsibilities is ensuring nobody is threatened with rape.

I really hope someone tips off a women's advocacy group about the kind of rhetoric being fueled by the Republican Party's "unification" efforts and how it specifically impacts women in this country.
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#2 ·
Did you report the post to the moderators?
northerntiger northerntiger MemberOP
39 messages
joined Jan 2010
#3 ·
William Bennett53 said:Hey, did you report that post to the mods?

Yeah, and I actually started this thread because this isn't his first rodeo—he keeps using the term "gangbang" whenever he talks about what’s going to happen once the Republican Party takes over.

I honestly feel like everyone should see this pattern.

A 30-point warning isn't enough here. This guy needs a permanent ban.

Check it out—just another post where he uses that gross word so enthusiastically while cheering on the Republican Party.

Post from May 23, 2014
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#4 ·
Understood, thanks for the report. I'll take a look at this and determine the next steps. 👍
William Gonzalez3 William Gonzalez3 Regular
276 messages
joined May 2009
#5 ·
I feel like I need to clarify things and perhaps ease the mind of my esteemed colleague northerntiger—it seems there’s a bit of a linguistic misunderstanding here. In American slang, the term "gangbang" doesn't necessarily imply mass rape; rather, it refers to a specific type of encounter, which you can actually verify through various American linguistic resources. The definition is essentially as follows:

an orgy-style encounter

noun [feminine singular, plural -s]

slang: a sexual encounter involving one woman and multiple men

If our colleague Sun-tzu had actually intended to describe mass rape, he would have used the term "gang-rape" instead.

I just wanted to lay that out, purely to ensure everything is clear from a technical standpoint.
Keith Miller30 Keith Miller30 Regular
328 messages
joined Aug 2014
#6 ·
I feel compelled to address the falsehoods being spread by Alex; suggesting that a gangbang is synonymous with sexual assault is an entirely baseless accusation that lacks any shred of reality. A gangbang is simply a consensual sexual encounter involving multiple participants—typically one woman with several men, or one man with several women. I am merely stepping in to ensure that the misinformation provided by Alex isn't accepted as fact, because if we are discussing disciplinary action, we must acknowledge that this is a matter of consensual activity rather than violence, which effectively nullifies her entire complaint.

I honestly couldn't care less about that particular user; if you feel the need to penalize them for using terms like "gangbang" in a political discussion, then go right ahead. However, I intend to report Alex for spreading these blatant lies and presenting false "facts," and I sincerely hope she is held accountable for it.
northerntiger northerntiger MemberOP
39 messages
joined Jan 2010
#7 ·
Honestly, all I can say about those last two posts is 🤦
You guys really found a way to defend him and try to "clarify" what he meant. It just screams that typical male lack of empathy when dealing with these kinds of threats. It’s pretty obvious what he was trying to get across by using that term. There's no way a mature adult would think that's a foundation for healthy communication, let alone shows any actual respect for women.
William Gonzalez3 William Gonzalez3 Regular
276 messages
joined May 2009
#8 ·
No problem at all, northerntiger 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads