CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Formula 1 › Sepang Grand Prix - March 30, 2014

Sepang Grand Prix - March 30, 2014

Started by Patrick Bailey4 · · 👁 11 views · 238 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Patrick Bailey4Lawrence Vaughn3Jason Campbell70ruggedhawk20darkmarlin16Raymond Anderson4Elizabeth Mendozabrightwolf48wanderingbison9jadeseal7Terry Carter2graniteharbor502John Ross55Walter Cox6shadowstag10dustycyclist19gentlecobra23Christian Harris11silentbadger17rustyridge10Joshua ScottChris Robinson25stormybadger8George Ramos15 …
darkmarlin16 darkmarlin16 Veteran
1K messages
joined Nov 2015
#221 ·
Tyler Bennett5 said:Valtteri Bottas moved up 10 spots. Honestly, I think Felipe Massa should've just let him through so he could actually have a shot at passing Jenson Button.
Maybe he wouldn't have caught him, but at least they would've actually tried for a second, you know? Massa didn't even make a real attempt at threatening Button's position.
We didn't have Pat Symonds over in Malaysia, so maybe things would've been handled with a bit more tactical finesse if he were there. Since we're heading to Bahrain and Steve Smedley will be around, I bet the
drivers will probably coordinate their moves a little better.
Williams Racing is struggling with rear downforce, which is why they looked so sluggish in the wet during both qualifying sessions.
But hey, that lack of downforce gives them a decent edge on the straights. Based on what I could see regarding fuel consumption, they were among the most efficient ones out there.
All in all, I’m feeling pretty good about these first two races. Sure, they might have snagged a couple more points, but when you look at how much
progress they've made compared to last season, it actually makes watching these races a lot more tolerable.

There’s no rain expected in Bahrain, so that'll be the first time we see dry qualifying, and both Williams drivers really need to break into the top 10 there. If they do, they could easily fight for a podium spot, or maybe even grab one.

Having two of them finishing in the top 6 during the race doesn't seem that crazy to me.😳
Tyler Bennett5 Tyler Bennett5 Active Member
149 messages
joined May 2019
#222 ·
Looks like we’ve got one less competitor in qualifying in Bahrain—Daniel Ricciardo is out.
What kind of penalty did Kevin Magnussen pick up today?
Valtteri Bottas just wrote his name in the record books as the first driver to rack up penalty points.
I guess he can't complain; since he's from Finland, he doesn't exactly have any buddies at the Department of Homeland Security to call to make those points disappear.
steelmaker83 steelmaker83 Active Member
215 messages
joined May 2019
#223 ·
Another race, another complete snooze fest. I’m sitting here debating whether to stir the pot or just stay quiet... decided to pass. I'll just stick to congratulating whoever takes pole.

I never thought I’d actually be rooting for his wins, but here we are—I’m celebrating them like they belong to Fernando Alonso.
jadeseal7 jadeseal7 Active Member
169 messages
joined Dec 2013
#224 ·
Tyler Bennett5 said:At least there’s one fewer competitor in qualifying in Bahrain—Ricciardo.
Does anyone know what kind of penalty Magnussen picked up today?
Well, Valtteri Bottas just officially wrote himself into the record books as the first driver to rack up penalty points.
I mean, can you really blame him? He's from Finland—he probably doesn't have any buddies over at the Department of Homeland Security to pull some strings and make those points disappear.

From what I gathered, he either got a 5 or 10-second stop, though I must have missed him serving it—I was likely drifting off to sleep during the broadcast.
gentlecobra23 gentlecobra23 Member
30 messages
joined Jan 2014
#225 ·
jadeseal7 said:As far as I can tell, they handed out a 5 or 10-second penalty, though I might have missed them serving it... probably just too tired to notice.

that penalty was served
darkmarlin16 darkmarlin16 Veteran
1K messages
joined Nov 2015
#226 ·
gentlecobra23 said:that penalty was already served

And honestly, if I’m remembering correctly, they pulled that during the pit stop while they were swapping out the tires.

Because hey, under the current rules, that's totally allowed now.
Raymond Anderson4 Raymond Anderson4 Regular
479 messages
joined Oct 2024
#227 ·
Tyler Bennett5 said:At least one less competitor in qualifying in Bahrain—Ricciardo.
What penalty did Magnussen pick up today?
Bottas just became the first driver to rack up penalty points this season.
Can't really blame him though; since he’s from Finland, he doesn't have any buddies at the Department of Homeland Security to pull some strings and wipe those points away.

But on the bright side, we get +2 for Williams, who should be looking much more competitive in Bahrain.

It's an even bigger headache for Ferrari if they hit a slow corner right before a straight. They either lack top-end speed or their traction out of the slow stuff is just terrible.
jadeseal7 jadeseal7 Active Member
169 messages
joined Dec 2013
#228 ·
darkmarlin16 said:If I'm remembering correctly, that happens during the pit stop while they're swapping tires.

Because, under the current rules, that’s actually allowed now.

Exactly—so basically, you just take a quick +5 or +10 second penalty, pull through the pits, and call it a day. But then, other times, a penalty hits you and suddenly your entire race is effectively over. It feels like the FIA has gone a bit soft lately, don't you think?😁
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#229 ·
dustycyclist19 said:I can't be bothered to dig through the archives right now, but didn't you just say like a month ago that Alonso is still the GOAT?🤷

I said Alonso was the best. Yeah, right. Good joke.🤣🤣🤣
Maybe you're two days ahead of schedule. 😬

Look, I’m not calling Fernando Alonso a fraud, nor am I out here trashing him. That’s just not my style. The truth is, I genuinely believe he belongs at the very top tier of drivers—he might even be in the current top three.
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#230 ·
jadeseal7 said:As far as I know, he got hit with a 5 or 10-second penalty. I must’ve been half-asleep because I totally missed him serving it.

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2014/03/3...enalty-points/

Valtteri Bottas, Jules Bianchi, and Kevin Magnussen are all sitting on two points in the driver standings...
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#231 ·
Jason Campbell70 said:Look, it’s only the second race, but I honestly can't see how Mercedes-Benz loses this.

We already saw during pre-season testing that the car is incredibly reliable and consistent.
Now in actual races, we're seeing they're a solid second per lap faster than everyone else.
That tire deg issue that killed them last season? Clearly isn't an issue this year. (Actually, it's not an issue for anyone, apparently.)
With a car this dominant, it’s hard to find a driver who wouldn't win the title—it's more about whether they can avoid losing it.

Like someone else said— and whatever, Lewis earned it.

Let’s finally agree on something for once.😁

I even agree with the last part—Lewis deserves it...
But damn, what am I thinking? He'll probably blow the title again... It feels like it'll just be some weird stupidity, pressing the wrong button on the steering wheel, or some totally ridiculous mechanical failure, crash, or spin off track...
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#232 ·
jadeseal7 said:


Sometimes I actually feel bad for Felipe Massa... his whole career just keeps circling back to the exact same thing.

And then someone tries to explain to me that Sauber isn't exactly a feeder program for Ferrari drivers.🤣🤣🤣
Timothy Castillo6 Timothy Castillo6 Active Member
148 messages
joined Apr 2010
#233 ·
stormybadger8 said:We really ought to miss Kamui😁
He managed to crack the top 10 twice during the race... he even grabbed 8th place once if you recall😁
If Kamui isn't out there grabbing points for the backmarkers, then what's the point of even having him on the grid?

They could honestly be moving even faster, let's hope! 🙏
It was basically a slow-motion parade, just like some people were already calling it.
darkmarlin16 darkmarlin16 Veteran
1K messages
joined Nov 2015
#234 ·
stormybadger8 said:http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2014/03/3...enalty-points/

Valtteri Bottas, Jules Bianchi, and Kevin Magnussen are all sitting on two points in the driver standings right now...

They’ll probably end up stripping Bianchi of those points because he didn't actually earn them through anything legit.

Honestly, he’s just as much to blame as Kamui Kobayashi was back in Australia.
steelmaker83 steelmaker83 Active Member
215 messages
joined May 2019
#235 ·
stormybadger8 said:I said Alonso was the best. Good joke.🤣🤣 🤣
Maybe you just started following this two days ago.😬

Another thing is, I don't call Alonso a fraud or trash him, because I actually believe he belongs in the absolute elite tier of drivers—maybe even the current top three.

lol, "maybe even."

Look, there’s no difference between saying Webber is better than Alonso or claiming Alonso is a total fraud. Your attempt at subtle trolling doesn't make it any less of a troll.
George Anderson5 George Anderson5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2014
#236 ·
Good grief, the sheer amount of bickering here.
Yesterday’s race served as nothing more than a stark confirmation that results are, for the most part, dictated by the machine. How else does one explain Daniel Ricciardo suddenly appearing to be on equal footing with Sebastian Vettel in a car that has been engineered for years solely to satisfy Sebastian Vettel's specific preferences? I say this because he spent the entire race trailing Sebastian Vettel by only a few seconds; that gap of roughly 13 seconds was, in my estimation, purely down to the tire delta during that stint.
Regarding the discussion on constructor rankings, I believe the standings perfectly reflect the actual performance:
1. Mercedes
2. Red Bull Racing
3. Ferrari
4. McLaren
5. Williams Racing

The only outlier was Nico Hulkenberg, who managed to break into the mix thanks to clever strategy and, naturally, his own driving.
Had Kimi Räikkönen not had that contact with Kevin Magnussen, he likely would have secured a 5th or 6th place finish, while Kevin Magnussen might have finished right behind Nico Hulkenberg without the penalty.
It is amusing to see the explanations offered here, which make it seem as though there are far more experts on this forum than there are within the actual teams or the pit lanes of the F1 circus.
If only some people would simply admit, "This is who I support, and this is my opinion."
I will give credit to stormybadger8, as his allegiances are always transparently obvious.
Not long ago, certain individuals were insisting that Renault possessed the most efficient and fuel-efficient engine—something discernible just from the sound of it—yet now they either claim otherwise or suggest it wasn't true. Their aerodynamics have always been their greatest strength, which was evident during the wet qualifying sessions and allowed Sebastian Vettel to stay so close.
In the context of the race, they stood absolutely no chance against Mercedes, just as no one else did against them.
If Mercedes had actually needed to push, they probably would have disappeared even faster than they already did.
Who knows? Perhaps they told Nico Rosberg to let Sebastian Vettel through while conserving tires, rather than punishing them immediately upon exiting the pits with the promise that he could overtake him later if necessary.
But Sebastian Vettel never truly got the opportunity, as Nico Rosberg pulled away after three or four laps.
All in all, it is still very early in the season, filled with unknowns and ongoing testing.
One mystery remains: Williams appeared to have the lowest fuel consumption, assuming the telemetry is accurate; why then did they fail to press the advantage during those final ten laps?
Either they have reached their limit, or the data is misleading.
steelmaker83 steelmaker83 Active Member
215 messages
joined May 2019
#237 ·
George Anderson5 said:Man, the amount of bickering here is endless.
Yesterday's race was just more proof for me that results mostly come down to the car. How else do you explain Daniel Ricciardo suddenly looking like he’s on par with Sebastian Vettel in a machine that’s been built specifically around Sebastian Vettel’s preferences for years? I say this because he spent the whole race hovering just seconds behind him, and I’d pin that 13-second gap entirely on the tire difference during that stint.
Regarding the car rankings, I think the results speak for themselves:
1. Mercedes
2. Red Bull Racing
3. Ferrari
4. McLaren
5. Williams Racing

The only outlier was Nico Hulkenberg in F1, thanks to his strategy and, obviously, his driving.
If Kimi hadn't had that contact with Kevin Magnussen, he probably would have finished 5th or 6th, and Magnussen might have ended up right behind Hulkenberg if it weren't for the penalty.
It’s funny how some people act like there are way more experts on this forum than there are in the actual F1 garages or pit boxes.
If only people would just admit, "Hey, I'm rooting for this guy, and this is just my opinion."
I'll give stormybadger8 credit here, though; it’s always obvious who his favorites are.
Not too long ago, people were claiming Renault had the best and most efficient engine—you could tell just by the sound—but now they’re either saying it isn't true or acting like it never was. Their aerodynamics have always been their strength, which showed during those wet qualifying sessions and why Sebastian Vettel stayed so close.
In the race, they didn't stand a chance against Mercedes, just like nobody else did.
If Mercedes really wanted to, they probably would have pulled away even faster than they did.
Who knows, maybe they told Nico Rosberg to let Sebastian Vettel through and save his tires instead of punishing them immediately after the pit stop, promising he could overtake him later anyway.
But even then, Sebastian Vettel didn't get a real shot before Nico Rosberg pulled away after three or four laps.
All in all, it's still early in the season—lots of unknowns and testing left to do.
One big unknown is Williams. If the telemetry is accurate, they had the lowest fuel consumption, so why didn't they push harder in those last 10 laps?
Either they hit a wall, or the data is wrong.


Regarding Williams, there are a few reasons. They are definitely faster than McLaren, and likely faster than Ferrari and Force India too. Unfortunately, they got stuck right behind McLaren since they’re using the same Mercedes power unit, and to make matters worse, they got held up by Felipe Massa.

Valtteri Bottas was clearly faster yesterday. That doesn't necessarily mean he would have overtaken Jenson Button, but he certainly would have been more competitive than Felipe Massa.

So, it was a mix of unfortunate circumstances and unfortunate drivers.
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#238 ·
steelmaker83 said:lol, maybe even.

Look, there's a massive difference between saying Mark Webber is on the same level as Fernando Alonso versus calling Alonso a straight-up fraud. Just because you're being subtle with your trolling doesn't mean you aren't trolling.

Since when did stating facts become trolling? 😵
As far as I recall, I said Mark Webber was clearly better in that Minardi 2002 than Fernando Alonso was in 2001. I also mentioned that Webber was superior back in Formula 3000 during the 2000 season.
Those are just the facts. You can roll your eyes all you want, but they're still true. 😉

It’s one thing if Mark Webber pulls a better qualifying lap, but Fernando Alonso is the one actually killing it during the race we all tune in to watch. That's why drivers like him always seem like the absolute best to everyone.
And honestly, Alonso just got lucky landing that Renault seat and walking away with two titles.
It doesn't mean Mark Webber was a total hack like some people love to claim. It just means he never fully tapped into his potential because he wasn't in the right place at the right time. And even when he finally was, he didn't have the luck of being paired with that untouchable, unbeatable number one driver.

Man, after what he pulled off in Melbourne, Mark Webber ended up jumping over to Williams. He joined a squad of former world champions—a serious powerhouse back then that was consistently fighting for titles, even snagging runner-up spots in 2002, 2003, and 2004. By the time he actually showed up there in '04, they were only trailing the runners-up by a tiny margin.😉
After everything he pulled off at Indianapolis, Alonso jumped ship to Renault. Up until that point, they hadn't won anything significant—they were just another mid-field team struggling to stay relevant.

You could make a very similar comparison between Fernando Alonso and Sebastian Vettel.
Both of them jumped ship to teams that were struggling to find any real footing before they arrived. We're talking about mid-fielders that actually had some decent potential under the hood, and then—boom—look at those ridiculous results. Just incredible.
Honestly, they could have all just ended up happy at McLaren like Sergio Perez did, and it would've been nothing more than a bunch of bananas.
People were actually speculating about Sebastian Vettel moving to Ferrari or McLaren, but Red Bull Racing blocked that transition from STR. Then, when he went out and said, "I don't think they demoted me with this decision," the internet just absolutely tore him apart. Everyone was basically like, "Oh, they definitely did." 🤣And honestly, they aren't even close. 😁

In my book, Mark Webber wasn't some underdog. He was right up there at the top tier with guys like Robert Kubica, Nico Hulkenberg, Juan Pablo Montoya, Nico Rosberg, and even Felipe Massa (back before the Ferrari era). Some of them just didn't get lucky enough to grab those massive wins—some probably never will—and who knows, maybe some of them actually will one day.
Maybe they didn't show quite as much as the top-tier crew, but they certainly weren't that far behind them either. Honestly, the big question is what could have happened if they’d just had better opportunities and a bit more luck throughout their careers.
Lewis Hamilton is a perfect example of that. He's an incredible driver, period. But if you actually sit down and judge him based on his titles alone, he's basically sitting right there in the same tier as Jenson Button.
Look, Lewis Hamilton still has time. He finally landed in a seat with a solid crew and a car that actually works, so he probably won't be stuck with just one podium finish.
Honestly, if the Ferrari pit crew had even a tiny bit more coordination, they could've walked away with the title today.😉
stormybadger8 stormybadger8 Veteran
1.8K messages
joined Apr 2013
#239 ·
steelmaker83 said:Regarding Williams. There are a few reasons. They’re definitely faster than McLaren, and probably even beating Ferrari and Force India. Unfortunately, they got stuck right behind McLaren using that same Mercedes Power Unit, and to make matters worse, Massa was holding them up.

Valtteri Bottas was clearly faster yesterday. That doesn't necessarily mean he would've overtaken Jenson Button, but he certainly would've been more competitive than Massa.

So, it's either a string of bad luck or just a string of unfortunate drivers.

You guys are still missing the most basic thing about F1.☕
Catching someone isn't the same as passing them.😉
And yeah, Bottas was faster, but take a look at how much Jenson Button ramped up his pace once they closed in...
Also, check out how Bottas's lap times didn't really drop regardless of being stuck behind Massa.😉
But if you're saying Bottas had a shot while Massa had zero? I'm with you there...

Just because Williams is faster—maybe by 0.5 seconds over the guy ahead—doesn't mean that's enough to actually make a move...
It’s highly debatable whether Mercedes could even pass Red Bull or Ferrari if they found themselves sitting right behind them...
And honestly, with this year's nonsense regarding automatic KERS deployment and smaller wings during DRS, overtaking feels way harder than before. You need a massive speed delta compared to previous seasons...

So realistically, even if Sebastian Vettel could keep pace with Nico Rosberg, his chances of an overtake were basically zero.
Same goes for Fernando Alonso and Daniel Ricciardo up front, or even Nico Hulkenberg...
There's no point overthinking it; the only thing that gives you a real chance is a huge advantage in tire life/age...
A tiny gap of 0.200 or 0.300 per lap isn't going to cut it. Honestly, I'm not even sure a full second is enough...
For instance, Fernando Alonso didn't just breeze past Nico Hulkenberg, even though he had an advantage of roughly 1.5-2 seconds per lap.😉

It's also a huge question mark what would've happened if the roles were reversed. I'm not convinced Nico Rosberg would have easily cleared Red Bull or Ferrari if he ended up behind them...

As for those fuel consumption graphics, you can take them with a grain of salt considering how questionable sensor accuracy is. I don't see how they'd calculate anything without relying on them.😁
Besides, where did they get Daniel Ricciardo's consumption data if his sensor died before the race?
And from what I know, they checked the flow on Daniel Ricciardo's car in the exact same way they did in Australia.🤣
Now, if Daniel Ricciardo had the edge over everyone else in Australia before that, why didn't he have it this time against Sebastian Vettel and the rest of the crew whose sensors were working? 😵

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads