CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Formal Complaint Against Admin Team - Specific Evidence and Claims

Formal Complaint Against Admin Team - Specific Evidence and Claims

Started by Nicholas King · · 👁 6 views · 23 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nicholas Kingrustydrifter10northerncyclist2Justin Harris12Brandon Lopez6coppersailor28Morgan Carterslycrane94
Nicholas King Nicholas King RegularOP
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#21 ·
rustydrifter10 said:Alright, so we've settled this then. 🤷

Are you actually kidding me right now?

Unless "settling things" is defined by constant bickering over font colors used by the Admin Forum, an outrageous barrage of nonsense, the senseless and inconsistent banning of perfectly benign posts, or perhaps the desperate deployment of every available moderator power to create an illusion of unanimity, then "you" haven't resolved a single thing—no matter how far back one looks...

The only reason "you" even exist is due to the CEO's complete and utter apathy toward this forum.

But hey, let's just wait for the storm to pass... 😬
Morgan Carter Morgan Carter Member
28 messages
joined Feb 2013
#22 ·
rustydrifter10 said:If a formal appeal has been filed regarding the N/A, then either a supermod or an admin has already reviewed the situation, or they are about to. It has been stated countless times: use the report button first, and if there is no response within 24 hours, escalate to higher authorities.

The fact remains that we have opened at least three separate threads. If you require proof, I can provide the links right here so you can see for yourself that there hasn't been a single response. Beyond that, several members have even sent direct messages. As for the reporting system—it functions perfectly well, yet it seems no one cares. Posts are eventually deleted, and that is about it. I have listed several examples here, and yet nothing happens. Tell me, based on these posts alone, how many people have actually received a warning?
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#23 ·
Morgan Carter said:Alright, then you tell me—out of all those posts, how many actually ended up getting a warning or a ban?

I honestly can't give you an answer because I don't have the direct links handy, and I have no clue where they're buried in this thread. Look, Scotsman is the supermod over in the Politics section, so if he hasn't responded to the appeals yet, maybe just shoot him a quick DM with some clearer directions on how to track down those specific posts.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#24 ·
Nicholas King said:Unless, of course, they actually consider "fixing" it to mean just letting the whole thing boil over.

It’s true what they say—one second you're right in the middle of a heated debate, and the next, the admins swoop in and shut the whole thread down before you can even get another word in edgewise.

Nicholas King said:Between that admin-colored font and the absolutely brutal way this was launched, I have to wonder—is there any method to this madness? It feels totally senseless. When you start handing out bans for perfectly harmless posts, or if you decide to swing every bit of moderator power you have at people, it’s going to leave a certain impression, don't you think? I honestly can't stop thinking about this whole concept of monolithism—that idea of everyone being perfectly unified and acting as one single, unbreakable unit. It’s such a heavy topic when you really sit down and chew on it, isn't it? You look at how certain groups try to present themselves to the world, projecting this image of absolute, unwavering solidarity, and it makes you wonder what's actually happening beneath the surface. Is it genuine, heartfelt unity, or is it just a carefully constructed facade designed to make them look stronger than they actually are? To me, it feels like we often mistake conformity for cohesion. There’s a massive difference between people standing together because they truly believe in the same thing and people standing together because they're too afraid to stand apart. When everything is forced into this rigid, monolithic mold, you lose all that beautiful, messy individuality that actually makes a community vibrant. It’s almost like trying to force an entire orchestra to play only one single note; sure, it would be perfectly "unified," but man, it would be incredibly boring! I’d much rather deal with the chaos of different voices coming together than the sterile silence of a monolith.Honestly, looking back as far as I can remember, you guys haven't actually settled a single thing...

And here we go again—just more finger-pointing and petty insults thrown around just for the sake of tearing someone down. Honestly, if this is how people want to communicate, I’m just not interested in playing along.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads