World Championship Qualifiers: Round 1
Started by redbison8 · · 👁 6 views · 27 replies
#22 ·
You messed up the count... I’m sitting at 6 out of 10 myself... missed Finland, France, America, and Spain... Adam King6 is actually up at 7 out of 10
#23 ·
Also, it’s currently 7.
I honestly thought the Frenchman might settle for a draw here, but looking at the board, it just doesn't seem like it's going to happen...
edit: actually, if my math is right, Adam King6 is sitting at 9.
Sent from my VTR-L29 via Reddit
I honestly thought the Frenchman might settle for a draw here, but looking at the board, it just doesn't seem like it's going to happen...
edit: actually, if my math is right, Adam King6 is sitting at 9.
Sent from my VTR-L29 via Reddit
#24 ·
I felt like someone was calling my name, so I had to check in...
To be fair, I actually nailed seven of them. I completely missed the biggest upsets, though—I called a win for the French and the Spaniards, plus that tie we had against the Canadians.
To be fair, I actually nailed seven of them. I completely missed the biggest upsets, though—I called a win for the French and the Spaniards, plus that tie we had against the Canadians.
#25 ·
How on earth can you claim a score of 7 when you've already missed 3? 🤣
9, damn it.
@Frank Hayes71 says he’s got an 8.
Sent from my VTR-L29 using Reddit
9, damn it.
@Frank Hayes71 says he’s got an 8.
Sent from my VTR-L29 using Reddit
#26 ·
Honestly, props to everyone—we definitely got hit with three massive upsets: those draws against France and Spain at home, plus that loss on the road for Team USA... But hey, we keep moving until someone finally hits a perfect 12 for 12. Round two is looking promising, though—on paper, at least—because a few of the matchups I picked for this Sunday look like total cakewalks. :-)
#27 ·
hiddencyclist112 said:How on earth can you claim a score of 7 when you've already missed 3? 🤣
9, damn it.
@Frank Hayes71 says he’s got an 8.
Sent from my VTR-L29 using Reddit
Basic math, buddy. 10 minus 3 equals 7. 🙂
The real issue is that the initial assumption—that we were actually picking 10 pairs correctly—wasn't exactly spot on to begin with. 🙈
🔗 Similar threads
- The "New Era" Hype Cycle: When do we actually trust the turnaround stories? in Fans · Jul 30, 2026
- The ethics of the "global expansion" era vs. real-world reality in Off-topic · Jul 30, 2026
- The unsung heroes of the wine world in Food & Drink · Jul 30, 2026
- Is a single "pillar" player too much of a risk for a championship run? in Fans · Jul 30, 2026
- The "Unsung Hero" factor in championship runs in Fans · Jul 30, 2026