Edge, who do you actually work for?

Edge, the way you handled that "sex education" thread on the politics board really shows me exactly who your mentors are. If my take on the subject was somehow so wrong, then why on earth did you wipe out the entire 37th page, scrub all my posts from the other pages in that thread, and delete a massive chunk of everyone else's comments too?

First you lock the whole damn thread down, and then you launch this full-blown inquisitorial purge against an entire army of posts.

Do you honestly think every single one of those users is some kind of fascist or terrorist?

Or is it someone else who’s the fascist or the terrorist—since we're clearly talking about who's terrorizing whom and who's forcing this one-sided, dictatorial mindset on everyone, both at the national level and right here on this forum?

Come on, give me a straight answer; surely you're liberal enough to handle an open question, right?

I archive everything I write, so whatever you (or anyone else) deletes stays on the internet forever. If you actually consider yourself a fair person, then maybe you can provide a coherent and just explanation for this inquisitor behavior of yours.

Look, Johnson can't even justify his own inquisitorial tactics, but I hold you to a much higher standard, so I'm expecting you to explain yourself. I even saw casia calling out your little crusade in another thread, so what's going on with you? Are you being pressured by someone?

If you are, then fine, just say YES—you don't need to write anything more than that!

We'll understand!

driftingfalcon3 said:Ryan Vaughn7, looking at what you did in that "sex education" thread on politics, it’s pretty obvious who your mentors are.

Who?

driftingfalcon3 said:If my opinion is somehow wrong, then why on earth did you wipe out the entire 37th page, all my posts on other pages in that thread, and a bunch of other users' comments too?

Because that thread was meant to discuss implementing sex ed in American schools. It wasn't an outlet for proving some conspiracy about lobby groups, attacking the Secretary's mental state, or ranting about anything else. Page 37 became nothing but off-topic noise and complaints about moderation. That's why it had to go.

driftingfalcon3 said:First you locked the thread, and then you started this whole Inquisition-style purge against a massive amount of posts.

It's standard procedure. A moderator has to clean things up, so we temporarily stop new posts from coming in while we handle the housekeeping.

driftingfalcon3 said:I archive everything I write, so whatever you (or anyone else) deletes stays on the internet forever.

Well, humanity thanks you for your service.

Alright, let's get down to brass tacks and look at my last post on that infamous deleted page 37—let's see exactly what was supposedly "controversial" about it:

Regarding Francesca’s response to this: "I don't see any problem with it!" What exactly is the issue here, rushing
toward the altar? Personally, I think she fails to see the massive problem with arbitrarily picking and choosing the criteria
used to define good versus evil.
That is the fatal liberal legacy right there. It's that Dostoevsky idea: "If God does not exist, everything is permitted!"
That is the whole story—that is the absolute heart and root of the entire issue!
Someone actually tried to reply to a part of my deleted post by trying to relativize the concept of nakedness
by pointing out that there are tribes who walk around naked, yet they don't use their nudity
as an excuse for everyone to engage in nonstop group sex whenever the opportunity arises.
That's a fascinating topic to dive into, along with cannibalism and stuff like that, and even though I haven't studied those specifics
deeply, just looking at it "from a distance," I can tell you it's hard to find a single tribe where genitals aren't covered up one way or another.
In every tribe across the globe, no matter how primitive, there is a clearly noticeable
uniquely human sense of shame and modesty that places an individual's sexuality squarely
within the realm of the intimate and the private, making the distinction incredibly transparent
between being a human being (created in God's image) and animals, which is exactly what those neo-Darwinists still try
so aggressively to equate humans and humanity with.
@ Basta, that section regarding the inherent link between pedophilia and homosexuality is incredibly telling and
of immense importance for exposing the true nature and motives of those who tear down people and
destroy society in America, and not just in America.
You gave a great answer to the guy who doesn't seem to realize that the attacks on priests come from the exact same kitchen, and it was established long ago that the main goal of Satanic Freemasonry is to destroy the Catholic Church!
Why is that their primary objective?
Well, you should ask their master, whom Jesus called the father of lies and a murderer from the beginning! You can't
really explain anything without looking at things from the other side. That's why atheism makes for a fun little psychological game
while we're just bickering on a forum, but once we start using atheism to drive decisions
that dictate behavior and establish the values of a social community, then we see exactly
where that leads.
__________________

So, show me—where exactly is the off-topic rambling? Where is any of the reasoning you're using to justify this inquisitorial wiping of entire threads on this topic? Where???

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Who?

This guy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCvcDW8Gwr0

Why on earth haven't I gotten an answer yet regarding my response to post #3 in this thread, where I was actually quoting a specific post from the "sex education" topic and asking for some real answers as to why that particular post was deleted from the "sex education" thread in the first place?

Instead of actually getting an answer to the question I asked just a few minutes ago, I’m getting my unapproved post nuked in this "sex education" thread.

If this isn't an Eclatant violation of human rights by a single moderator, then I honestly don't know what is.

I am demanding a statement from the admin, and I’ll probably be taking this up with other institutions too. Here was the post that just got deleted:

Quote: mestar said:It's clearly visible in all the recommended reading!

And that is exactly the problem—people just blindly follow mainstream propaganda instead of actually tackling the crucial
issues. Part of the blame falls on the Church, which I'm not even sure (at least here in America) has even
notified its own followers about this, let alone the general public:
http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r19/lp-c/102006324
So then people act shocked when neo-Darwinian teachings lead to schools starting to push
pornographic-deductive methods?
A silent, timid Church combined with a silent, timid American people means we are essentially allowing
the moral and psychological safety and health of our own children to be jeopardized!
__________________[/I]


ONE SMALL STEP FOR MAN ONE GIANT LEAP FOR MONKEYKIND Only fools say... This will blow your
mind

Edge just nuked this post too!

Check out this quote I found on Wikipedia about Pope John Paul II:
He was actually the first Pope to ever send an email! It was this message sent to the Church in Oceania back on November 22, 2001. I saw it.
Is the internet actually a tool for evangelization? Some liberal theologians still insist on treating it like some kind of anti-modernist threat, though I don't see it that way at all. Some of them...
And there’s also the fact that... Some people actually had the nerve to claim back then that abortion was on the same level as the Holocaust., a When you look at what counts as one of the heavy sins...
He went ahead and lumped premarital sex, masturbation, and getting wasted all into the same category..
He was asking for forgiveness for the horrors committed in the name of the Catholic Church, seeking pardon for how the Church treated...
Look, we need to talk about how women have been treated throughout history—everything from those insane witch hunts to the way they’ve been forced into submission. It’s wild. And now, he’s gone and officially rehabilitated Galileo Galilei, who...
So, yeah, the Church actually condemned him back in the day just because of heliocentric theory. And then he went on to speak out against those horrific crimes committed against Native Americans, too.
To the Jews. He bowed his head in their memory at Auschwitz. He fought tirelessly against antisemitism. He was the first Pope who...
I visited a synagogue back in '86 while I was out in Rome.
He actually went and coined the whole concept of "theology of the body." Breaking it all down—and I’m talking about going totally against that old-school way of looking at things where...
Is the body—as opposed to the spirit—basically condemned to be nothing but a constant source of sin? I see the whole picture of what a human being actually is as...
It’s all about being whole—hitting those physical, mental, and spiritual goals all at once.He basically perfected that whole approach back when he was just around 129—it's like how John Paul II developed his way of doing things.
Back when he was giving those Wednesday talks between 1979 and 1984—the same Pope who authored the current Catechism of the Catholic Church—he was laying it all out there.
It was declared back in '92, and if you look at articles 2289 through 2298, it goes deep into the whole concept of the body and physicality... About business. In sections 2331 through 2386...So, let me break down what we're actually talking about when we dive into the Sixth Commandment—"You shall not commit adultery." It sounds straightforward on paper, right? Like a simple "don't cheat" rule, but if you really sit down and look at it through the lens of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, there is so much more depth to it than just physical infidelity. It’s about respect, dignity, and the sanctity of those deep, committed bonds we form. We aren't just talking about a single act here; we're talking about the whole spectrum of how we treat ourselves and our partners. It covers everything from lustful thoughts that treat people like objects to any kind of behavior that devalues the sacredness of marriage and intimacy. Honestly, it’s about protecting the integrity of love itself. It's an invitation to live with purity of heart and to honor the commitments we make, ensuring that our actions actually align with the respect we claim to have for others. It's bigger than just a list of "don'ts"—it's about building a life rooted in genuine, selfless affection.Physical health is truly "God's gift."
"God's gift" (2288), but... Christian irony is basically pushing back against this whole neo-pagan vibe that’s taking over, which...
It’s basically pushing this whole cult of the body where everyone’s expected to sacrifice everything just to worship physical perfection and athletic prowess.
Success is treated like some kind of god. (article 2289)
__________________

I mean, shouldn't bringing up the teachings of the Catholic Church be totally fine in a discussion about sex education? It’s not like we should be banning that, right? Especially when you consider how much weight it carries, knowing that such a massive figure—someone who was such a legendary Pope and a true champion for the American people like John Paul II was—spent so much time focusing on this exact subject.

By what authority does Edge just go around nuking every single thing I post in that "sex education" thread? Seriously, what gives them the right to wipe my entire history there?

I’m seriously calling out the admins again!!!

So, what, the admins actually want me to start some parallel thread about "sex education" over on the politics board, where I have to manually copy every single one of my deleted posts and follow them up with "once again, I am demanding an explanation from the administration"? And then, after every single one of my demands gets shot down by every single admin, Reddit—as an institution, to the whole wide world—implicitly signals that it’s perfectly fine for all the admins on this site to EclatantLY violate human rights just by silencing anyone with opposing ideologies?

This kind of behavior is totally consistent with how Secretary Johnson acts; there's absolutely no doubt about that.

But honestly, it blows my mind that the admins here don't realize just how counterproductive it is to keep scoring these massive self-inflicted goals. 😕😕😕

Then again, I guess it makes sense—sometimes pure hatred just drowns out common sense, and at that point, it doesn't matter if everyone sees our true colors; the only thing that matters is making sure the voice of reason stays quiet right where it should be heard. As for the complaints, let driftingfalcon3 just whine to themselves; we're going to keep offering up open arms to Edge so they can use those sharp inquisitor shears to snip away every single driftingfalcon3 post (and, of course, plenty of others), regardless of how perfectly polite or accurate those posts actually are.

Carry on!

I’m noticing a pattern here. Why is this malicious, totally irrelevant post still being left up?

KarayaOne said:No. It’s more that the Church doesn't care about real issues or the dangers facing our youth. Instead, they just want to preserve medieval dogmas. As if the world is flat, or the sun revolves around the Earth... as if pure ego blinds us all, or we should burn anyone who disagrees. Some dogmas have already crumbled—after the heretics were burned, of course—while others are still fighting to stay relevant.

Yet my own post gets deleted just because I asked, "does that church really enter?"

Jerry Myers19 said:I’m seeing the exact same thing here. This totally random, malicious post just gets left standing:

KarayaOne said:Check out this post
It's not even about the Church caring about actual problems or dangers facing kids; it's all about clinging to medieval dogmas. They act like the world is flat, the sun orbits the Earth, being blinded by ego is fine, and they want to burn anyone who doesn't fit their mold... some dogmas have already fallen (after they finished burning heretics), but they’re still fighting tooth and nail against others.

while my post—where I'm literally just asking the author, "does that church really enter"—gets nuked.

What's the deal, man? It's like there's some weird set of rules from a parallel universe in play here. I'm basically showing up to report a NEWLY DELETED POST and making sure all the admins see it, because they're just sitting there watching one user get censored while cheering on the guy doing the censoring.

@ Basta, eugenics is definitely lurking in the background, because if Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and so many others say Otvoreno
that the global population is unsustainable and needs to be slashed by at least 2 billion, and according to
Rosetta Stone the ideal total world population should be under 1 billion, then
it shouldn't surprise anyone that this isn't some conspiracy theory, but rather the open proclamations of
Bilderberg spokespeople.
And once these agendas hit our schools, when the truth behind the swine flu vaccines comes out,
when chemtrails are demystified, when we see the real point behind GMO food politics, the distribution of harmful
(and unnecessary) drugs, and the bans on growing your own food, things will become clear even
to the average person...
But can any of you "truth-seeker" types following Johnson tell me this:
Quote:

Quote: According to the Secretary, teachers should prepare for class this way, and then during the lesson they should talk about the harms of pornography—basically the complete opposite. It's totally nonsensical, they claim. Now that a huge number of parents have revolted against this, the Secretary is trying to convince us that the curriculum will implement something completely contrary to what's in the textbooks, which is absurd, concludes Ilcic. Who is messing with whose head? Is it us Johnson followers, or is it you Johnsonites messing with us out of pure (eugenic) peace? If you can see from an airplane who is messing with whose head, how do you Johnsonites have the audacity to call white black and black white? Where do you get the moral strength to lie to yourselves and the rest of the world like this? Do you people even think with your own brains, or do you just listen to whatever Johnson says and then play it back like a broken record? Stop, think, and look yourselves in the mirror.

And now I'm getting this ban from Edge:

You’ve been flagged for an infraction on Reddit.

Reason: Offtopic/spam
-------

-------

This infraction carries a 10-point penalty and could lead to temporary account restrictions. Major violations stay on your record permanently.

I am seriously insisting—for the millionth time now, I don't even know how many times I've said this—that an admin actually needs to step up and respond to me!!!

New post and more deletions:

Quote: Quote: Basta said:Check out this post
that viewpoint is totally biased and loaded with ideology...
As if!

And then there's this:
http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=4...4&postcount=10

Or how about this:
http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=42828751&postcount=1

Where exactly is the bias or the "ideological coloring" in any of this?

More strike points added:

Dear driftingfalcon3,

You have received an infraction on Reddit.

Reason: Offtopic/spam
-------

-------

This infraction is worth 10 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?p=42828792

I’m seriously insisting on a response from the admins!!!

Don't mind me, I'm just gonna keep riffing on my own here...

Basta actually nailed exactly who and what Edge is:

I honestly have to quote Bastin on this:

To put it bluntly, it’s like someone is pouring gasoline onto a car that's already engulfed in flames... and then Edge wants me to sit there acting confused about why the damn thing is burning so bright and for so long, all while refusing to let me even mention the gas can or the guy holding it...

Edge tries to hide his blatant bias by pretending he's just following "moderation principles," but one of the biggest hallmarks of bad moderation is setting boundaries that are way too tight during a discussion...

which is exactly why I'm pushing to get my posts restored and those penalties wiped ...