#1 ·
I have read through the rules thoroughly, and I find myself with two specific questions.
1. Who decided to move my inquiry regarding the errors made by rezon@tor—which is categorically not an appeal—into the thread dedicated to card appeals?
From what I understand, such decisions fall under the jurisdiction of the supermod. I am merely asking. Unless, of course, my understanding is flawed.
Even if I am mistaken about the protocol, that topic is fundamentally misplaced there because the subject matter is entirely unrelated. It is not an appeal!
The intent here is a technical clarification, not a grievance. That is 😉my
intention.
Or, to be more precise:
2. If this action was taken by rezon@tor, I assume it would be only fair if he were to address the actual issue: why did he assign me 35 points and a penalty for a private message that does not even exist?
In fact, he openly admitted his mistake regarding the post he misclicked on.
I am not appealing his judgment or the penalty itself; rather, I am pointing out errors that are plainly evident.
Furthermore, I am simply exercising the protections afforded to me by your own regulations. 🙂
It may seem trivial or absurd to you at this stage, but sweeping past mistakes under the rug serves no one. Correcting them is vital, and I have a significant reason for doing so that has nothing to do with you.
It is quite clear that rezon@tor erred twice; an appeal isn't even necessary when the facts speak for themselves, especially given his own admission, wouldn't you agree?
I sincerely hope that any potential animosity from the moderator rezon@tor does not increase the "Q factor," as moderators coming from a political background are often far too adept at smoothing over verbal transgressions to maintain true accountability.
1. Who decided to move my inquiry regarding the errors made by rezon@tor—which is categorically not an appeal—into the thread dedicated to card appeals?
From what I understand, such decisions fall under the jurisdiction of the supermod. I am merely asking. Unless, of course, my understanding is flawed.
Even if I am mistaken about the protocol, that topic is fundamentally misplaced there because the subject matter is entirely unrelated. It is not an appeal!
The intent here is a technical clarification, not a grievance. That is 😉my
intention.
Or, to be more precise:
2. If this action was taken by rezon@tor, I assume it would be only fair if he were to address the actual issue: why did he assign me 35 points and a penalty for a private message that does not even exist?
In fact, he openly admitted his mistake regarding the post he misclicked on.
I am not appealing his judgment or the penalty itself; rather, I am pointing out errors that are plainly evident.
Furthermore, I am simply exercising the protections afforded to me by your own regulations. 🙂
It may seem trivial or absurd to you at this stage, but sweeping past mistakes under the rug serves no one. Correcting them is vital, and I have a significant reason for doing so that has nothing to do with you.
It is quite clear that rezon@tor erred twice; an appeal isn't even necessary when the facts speak for themselves, especially given his own admission, wouldn't you agree?
I sincerely hope that any potential animosity from the moderator rezon@tor does not increase the "Q factor," as moderators coming from a political background are often far too adept at smoothing over verbal transgressions to maintain true accountability.