Jason Campbell70 said:Back in the day, maybe 20 or 30 years ago, the cars had crappy tires, the aero was way less efficient, and drivers were basically using their right foot on a cable just to control the throttle butterfly. They were shifting gears with basic manual gearboxes and standard clutches, too. Those cars were absolute beasts at the end of the dayβjust raw machines that demanded everything from a driver physically and mentally. Drivers were rocking these cheap plastic helmets with flimsy visors, and track drainage? I guess that was just some abstract concept they barely thought about back then.
Yeah, I get what you mean. They had worse aerodynamics, relying more on mechanical grip than todayβs carsβwhich are probably even harder to drive. So it makes sense... modern cars lean so heavily on aero that when speeds drop significantly, they lose all that downforce, which kills the grip. And they're lighter, too. As for the tires, it all comes down to the compound, which is mostly about feel. How much water they displace is a whole different story and might depend more on the tread patterns rather than the rubber itself. The main thing is avoiding aquaplaning, but honestly, it's hard to say if things were actually worse back then since it really depends on the specific track. I mean, we can't even tell what kind of drainage a track has just by looking. I agree with the rest, thoughβdriving in the wet was harder, shifting was a pain, and it was just more exhausting... that's just a fact. We're getting into territory where nobody can really be certain, and I guess nowadays they have better data based on how the cars behave. I wouldn't call the drivers spoiled, and I don't think it's just the FIA being unreasonable, because they usually act in unison when deciding to stop a race. Itβs not for nothing, and I guess we aren't exactly experts here either.