Started by casualharbor9 · · 👁 5 views · 25 replies
Kimberly White63 said:And where did I say you were the only one at fault?
It's just that most people on here send me immoral private messages because their posts got deleted, yet you're the one complaining about the general rules.😬
casualharbor9 As stated by:
Does one truly believe that an individual who responds to a simple presentation of facts with a flurry of vitriolic personal attacks is somehow lacking in mental stability? It is quite an interesting psychological puzzle, isn't it? One might argue that when someone finds their position dismantled by undeniable evidence, they pivot toward character assassination as a desperate defense mechanism—much like a cornered animal lashing out simply because it can no longer defend its territory. In my view, such a volatile reaction serves as a rather transparent indicator that the person lacks the intellectual fortitude to engage in a rational debate.
In a civilized debate, one might wonder if there is any penalty for someone who simply declares, with absolute certainty, that they find the entire discussion completely incomprehensible. Is such an admission of confusion actually grounds for being penalized?
Is it even possible to label someone who, from the very moment they started duplicating their own arguments, continues to drop these nonsensical pearls that bear absolutely no relation to the actual topic, as a true logician—or perhaps just a "so-called" logician?
casualharbor9 said:It seems we have reached a peculiar crossroads where one is permitted to disparage reason, logic, and the fundamental tenets of natural science without offering a shred of evidence, yet the moment someone attempts to offer a rebuttal, they are met with immediate silence or dismissal. It is quite a curious dynamic, isn't it? It feels as though we are navigating a landscape where irrationality is given a free pass to roam, while the pursuit of a reasoned counter-argument is treated as the true transgression.
casualharbor9 As stated by:
I feel quite strongly that this situation impacts me directly, particularly if I am to be penalized for maintaining the exact same standard of conduct toward others as those who aren't being targeted by such disciplinary actions.
casualharbor9 said:I find myself wondering exactly which specific topics we are expected to refrain from commenting on, and more importantly, how one defines the scope of "everything"? While I certainly understand that off-topic discussions within an alternative thread are perfectly acceptable, it seems there is a certain lack of tolerance regarding the remarks made by casualharbor9 on those very same subjects. I would appreciate some clarity on this matter so that I might navigate our future interactions with the appropriate level of discretion.
casualharbor9 said:Excuse me? Someone acting like a moderator is suddenly setting the agenda, demanding a specific topic? Or is it just someone who hasn't written a single coherent word regarding the subject of Nibiru, yet tries to push an agenda that wouldn't even fly in a university Philosophy department?
If this is meant to be a space for independent thought, it shouldn't function like a psychiatric ward where patients lash out at anyone presenting facts that contradict their personal delusions.
If you intend to maintain even a baseline level of tolerance, you have to demonstrate that attacking people's viewpoints is unacceptable, regardless of whether those views are mainstream or unconventional.
...
The whole point of this sub is so people like henkak and none can actually speak their minds. Otherwise, if they went over to, say, Reddit, they’d get banned instantly—probably face-to-face with a permanent suspension. This has been common knowledge on the internet for ages.
Look, I agree that just spewing vitriol isn't acceptable. But if we strictly follow that rule, half this subreddit is gone. You don't even realize how much content gets nuked just because someone decides it's "too much."
henkak said:there’s a ton of stupidity on this site, but this is the absolute PEAK HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
what kind of nonsense is this? 😂🤦
90 percent of these empty-headed idiots list what they call "criteria," but they fall apart the second anyone looks at them 🤣
the best ones are the ones rambling about grip strength—if I could see your powerful handshakes, man, hahaha, pure peak idiocy, just peak 😂
henkak said:what an idiot 😂
henkak said:aaaaaahahahahahahahahhahahahaha
this guy can't even string a coherent sentence together 😂🤣
henkak said:we should tax the morons who have over 20,000 posts across various message boards.
A guy with 27,000 posts is really out here calling someone a coward? That’s rich. Hahaha. 😂🤣
henkak said:So, I guess it’s time to head back over to the General Discussion boards or the Women's Corner to keep going with that same trash conversation you guys were already having there.
henkak said:Honestly, the religious crowd always gets on my nerves—whether they’re Christians or any other faith group—but let's be real: you're being a complete idiot here, too.
I don't know what to make of this one. Is there actually any substance here, or are we just shouting into the void again? It feels like we're circling the same drain without ever reaching a point. Does anyone else feel that sense of total futility when looking at these discussions lately? It’s almost impressive how little progress is made despite all the noise. Just curious if I'm the only one noticing the pattern. kaže:
Of course, it’s always easiest to just sit there and talk trash. Everywhere you look, you run into these idiots who will laugh in your face the second you actually try to step up or change something. They act like they’ve swallowed all the wisdom in the world when they're sitting safely behind their own four walls, but in reality? They're just pathetic, spineless losers. Their entire worldview is trapped inside that tiny little box they built for themselves. Honestly, how can we even expect to see any real progress when we're dealing with people like that? Not anytime soon, that's for sure.
I don't know what to make of this. Is there any actual substance here, or are we just shouting into the void again? It feels like we're circling the same drain without ever actually getting anywhere. Does anyone else feel that, or am I just overthinking the entire situation? The user says:
I’m honestly just spitting in the face of you, AstroBob, and every other self-proclaimed "scientist" on this site. Seriously, go find a life, you little parasites.
henkak said:🤣
I see your posts on this thread, and honestly, I can only assume you and everyone else here are cut from the same cloth. It’s just not worth my time to scroll through all of this. To be blunt? I think you’re just an insecure idiot. Anyway, take care.
Keith Gonzalez said:Out of everything you just quoted, my only oversight was one. Just one. I don't care what other mods choose to do or not do on their own dashboard. Also, I have no idea how you managed to quote deleted posts. It’s obvious you have a vendetta against this specific individual, and it's up to you people to settle that among yourselves.