jadesailor14 said:Sorry, are you some kind of psychic now? ....
Something like that, so 🙂
jadesailor14 said:Look, I am blind. Like, officially diagnosed blind, basically a bat
Ali if you say so, then this photo is just pure self-delusion: I don't know how to
My bad. My first recipe didn't have the label on it.
Look, I’ll admit when I mess up.
Everything else I said still stands.
jadesailor14 said:I was a moderator way back when
back during those days of chaos and good vibes
but some of you don't rememberbecause you weren't even on Reddit yet
Unknown, what is that supposed to mean? That we're somehow less valuable users just because of that?
jadesailor14 said:I haven't noticed you posting recipes, joining debates, giving advice, anything culinary... so sorry for my remark about you not having any specific posts
I thought I knew all the foodies on here pretty well, but apparently I don't
We all know you only notice what fits your narrative.
Isn't this post just a passive-aggressive insult? Just like this one? I didn't notice they were flagged. Or will that happen retroactively too?
Anyway, you forgot to apologize for dragging me with this:
Polly said:even now, from the very start of the new round, you already know who the winner is, even though the rules clearly state voting will be done through a public poll
Ali we’re just going to rig the public poll too, I guess.
Seriously, please explain to all of us—the mods and admins alike—how exactly that works. I’d love to know the secret sauce.
jadesailor14 said:My policy isn't about handing out warnings just because someone clearly made a mistake. If they insist on being stubborn and doubling down on their ego, then that's a different story.
But you only hand out warnings for "passive-aggressive insults" to a select few.☕
jadesailor14 said:And part of the "boycott" is that the winner is already a foregone conclusion. :rofl : :rofl : :rofl :
I really need to go buy myself a crystal ball. I seriously do.
Where can I find one on sale?
Sarcasm doesn't really suit you, especially when everyone knows the truth.
Want to borrow mine?
Elizabeth Anderson63 said:To be honest, before these contests started, I used to drop by the Foodie section maybe once a week.
Ever since these contests kicked off, the topics are basically sitting in my subscription feed.😍
The idea itself is great, and props to DD for getting it moving.
Unfortunately, the Foodie section is ruled by such a massive amount of concentrated ego that sometimes it's actually nauseating to read.
Some foodies communicate with the rest of the community in a really ugly way, and they don't get a single warning for it. If those same foodies hang out in a thread with two mods from the Foodie section, you automatically start wondering if the mods are protecting them and if they're being objective.
Honestly, Polly, I saw how you handled things with Dlap when she started protesting the contest, and kudos to you. You were a solid moderator and handled all the complaints and dissatisfaction regarding the contest perfectly.
What I’d recommend—and don't think I'm being biased just because I frequent threads with the regulars—is that if you're going to hand out warnings for passive-aggression, then do it fairly across the board, including the foodies. They've produced the most passive-aggressive nonsense I've ever read.
I won't put Dlap on ignore because her advice is genuinely phenomenal, but she also knows how to be incredibly rude to others, and that doesn't get sanctioned (at least, not visibly).
Let me be clear: I'm not saying this so Dlap gets a warning. I'm saying if you're going to moderate fairly, there shouldn't be "protected" people and "unprotected" people. Either everyone who's insulting others gets a warning, or you just admit the Foodie section is a place for bloated egos where insults are allowed.😉
edit: Just to be clear so nobody gets the wrong idea. It’s not just Dlap being difficult, and she isn't the sole reason why the vibe in culinary school is such a mess right now.
🙂