CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Blood draws at the clinic

Blood draws at the clinic

Started by Sam Ramos85 · · 👁 8 views · 51 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Sam Ramos85vividpilot14Angela WrightBryan Diazwiredcanyon2restlesstrucker31Scott Allen10Lawrence Wellsurbanpilotmelloworca6jadesailor14Paul JohnsonKyle Lee7Casey Rogers47Brandon Newman95cosmicviper11Matthew Taylor17slywolf45Chris Peterson53swiftbear86
Sam Ramos85 Sam Ramos85 Active MemberOP
55 messages
joined Oct 2012
#1 ·
What’s everyone’s take on having blood drawn right there in the clinic by your primary care doctor under these new rules?

To me, it just feels wrong to have my blood taken at a desk next to a computer, buried under a mountain of paperwork in conditions that aren't even remotely hygienic or sterile.
Having needles sitting on the same surface where a constant stream of people drops off their insurance cards and cash every single day...
Honestly, this is probably the biggest load of nonsense our Department of Health has ever forced onto local clinics—basically forcing family doctors to do things when they don't even have the setup for it.

And the craziest part? It's being handled by nurses who just sat through some quick, few-hour crash course to get a certificate saying they're allowed to draw blood. They haven't actually practiced this, yet now they're basically learning on the fly with the patients walking through the door.
(Since I lived in Germany for a while, I know firsthand that over there, a nurse might be cleared for a subcutaneous injection, but drawing blood isn't even an option.)

If this topic is in the wrong subforum or if there's already a thread for this, I’d ask the moderators to please move it or just delete it.
vividpilot14 vividpilot14 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Aug 2021
#2 ·
Hmm, since when was that the case?🙂 Look, my sister is great, truly, but I wouldn't trust her to draw blood from me🙂!
Angela Wright Angela Wright Regular
731 messages
joined Feb 2007
#3 ·
I’m totally fine with this; honestly, it’s one of the few smart moves Kennedy's has made lately. I still have nightmares about those chaotic mornings at the local community health center—standing there while I was pregnant, surrounded by people coughing, spitting, sniffing, burping, kids screaming their heads off, and seniors constantly grumbling... it was pure hell. I don't know what kind of conditions nurses are dealing with elsewhere, but my doctor has her own private practice setup: she has her exam room, a dedicated station for wound care, and a small reception area where the nurse handles all the paperwork and referrals. My only real worry is that because nurses have been buried under mountains of mandatory paperwork for years, they might be out of practice when it comes to drawing blood. To do it right—without digging around in your arm or leaving massive bruises—you really need to be a seasoned pro who does it every single day.
Bryan Diaz Bryan Diaz Active Member
101 messages
joined Sep 2009
#4 ·
Sam Ramos85 said:What’s everyone’s take on having blood drawn right there in the clinic by your primary care doctor under these new rules?

To me, it just feels wrong to have my blood taken at a desk next to a computer, buried under a mountain of paperwork in conditions that aren't even remotely hygienic or sterile.
Having needles sitting on the same surface where a constant stream of people drops off their insurance cards and cash every single day...
Honestly, this is probably the biggest load of nonsense our Department of Health has ever forced onto local clinics—basically forcing family doctors to do things when they don't even have the setup for it.

And the craziest part? It's being handled by nurses who just sat through some quick, few-hour crash course to get a certificate saying they're allowed to draw blood. They haven't actually practiced this, yet now they're basically learning on the fly with the patients walking through the door.
(Since I lived in Germany for a while, I know firsthand that over there, a nurse might be cleared for a subcutaneous injection, but drawing blood isn't even an option.)

If this topic is in the wrong subforum or if there's already a thread for this, I’d ask the moderators to please move it or just delete it.

What do you mean, not sterile? The needles come individually packaged, and once they're opened, they're used immediately and then tossed. There isn't some elaborate disinfection process required after opening them in any lab, really. They just use alcohol to prep the site where they poke you, and that’s pretty much it.

Besides, all nurses learn how to draw blood during their training. They learn from one another and practice during their clinical rotations. So, when you see a nurse in an office setting, it’s rarely their first time doing it.

But, I suppose I see your point—I don't think nurses should necessarily be the ones doing this. There are plenty of trained lab technicians available, and since nurses already have such heavy workloads, this just seems to slow them down even more.
wiredcanyon2 wiredcanyon2 Member
32 messages
joined Apr 2011
#5 ·
This is basically the future of medicine here in the States, provided they can actually get the logistics to work in the real world. Ideally, you’d be able to handle most of this stuff right at your primary care doc's office so people aren't wasting their lives wandering around massive hospital complexes just to get basic blood work done. I’m all for the decision. As for hygiene standards or whether a nurse actually knows what they're doing—well, that should go without saying. There are protocols for a reason, and anyone on the job ought to know how to follow them. If they don't, that’s a localized mess within that specific clinic, but the policy itself? It's a solid move.
restlesstrucker31 restlesstrucker31 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Apr 2010
#6 ·
The nurse at my doctor's office is such a grouchy old lady that there's no way I'm letting her draw my blood 😳😳... she has zero patience and isn't kind to patients at all. Honestly, I think the doctor would end up drawing my blood before that nurse even gets a chance to 😁
As for the crowd, I'm pretty sure it'll be packed regardless.
Scott Allen10 Scott Allen10 Regular
315 messages
joined Jun 2005
#7 ·
Honestly, this whole thing is a joke. It’s just a classic populist move designed to sell people on some fake sense of "reform"... My issue isn't even that most nurses wouldn't know how to draw blood if their lives depended on it—though let's be real, they'd struggle—or even the fact that it adds a mountain of extra paperwork and time to an already packed schedule... it's more about what happens to the sample once it's out of the vein?

Who’s actually supposed to drive these things to the lab? Is FedEx or DHL just going to drop by the clinic? Or is the nurse expected to slam the door in everyone's face during the morning rush just to play delivery driver for some test tubes?

And when does the transport happen?... Right away, or just whenever they "feel like it"?... How long can a sample sit there without being centrifuged, depending on what they're testing for? It's pretty obvious that in the real world, blood might get drawn around 7 or 8 AM, and then it just sits somewhere questionable—on a sunny windowsill, next to a radiator, or maybe shoved in a fridge?—and once everything is finally processed and the paperwork is sorted, it all gets hauled off to the lab around 9 or 10 AM... and that's just one clinic, imagine the chaos across dozens of them. Who can honestly say any of these samples are actually representative once you factor in the collection, storage, and transit? Nobody.

What about urine samples?... Do these small clinics even have a dedicated space to collect and store them? Or is that going to end up sitting on a radiator, a windowsill, or a random sink too?

Basically, there’s a massive pile of practical questions that none of these "experts" bothered to think about. And at the end of the day, which is the most important part, there's the question of actual expertise... properly collecting, storing, processing, and transporting samples is strictly the job of the lab technicians, not the nursing staff in outpatient clinics.... Why on earth would we tank the quality of care for the public like this?
It’s the exact same logic you'd use if you decided nurses should also handle physical therapy for certain patients... sure, why not? I mean, we have physical therapists for a reason, but why should people walk all the way to a specialized rehab center when they could just do it at their doctor's office... a little electricity, some ice, moving limbs around a bit, and boom—same thing, right? ...yeah, okay.
wiredcanyon2 wiredcanyon2 Member
32 messages
joined Apr 2011
#8 ·
In my town, they’ve been doing this at the local clinic for a while now. It’s basically up to the patient if they want to get their blood drawn right there with the doctor or trek all the way out to the main hospital lab. From what I gather, the samples taken at the clinic are handled exactly like the ones from the big lab—storage, transport, all that jazz. I mean, the medical pros supposedly know how to handle biological material properly; if they don't, then 🤷. For an old lady living in the neighborhood where this doctor works, grabbing her blood work done at the clinic is a hell of a lot easier than hopping on a city bus to head down to the general hospital. Honestly, I actually dig the system they have in New York City, where the health center has one central lab serving several different offices. The concept is solid; it just needs to be executed well—which, let's face it, is how everything goes in the end.
Lawrence Wells Lawrence Wells Regular
312 messages
joined Jun 2006
#9 ·
I think that’s actually a great setup! It gives me the freedom to decide whether I want to stick with my regular family doctor or just head over to the school clinic instead.
urbanpilot urbanpilot Active Member
72 messages
joined Feb 2011
#10 ·
Honestly, I’ve heard the same thing about how things work elsewhere, and it sounds better to me. No more endless waiting, and no more playing tag with your doctor—you know the drill: sprinting to the clinic one day for a referral, dragging yourself to the lab the next morning before 8 AM sharp just to get blood drawn, then trekking back in the afternoon to wait around for your doctor to actually look at the results.
As for the nurses' credentials? If they're qualified enough to handle IVs and injections, I don't see why they can't pull blood, too.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#11 ·
I’m guessing they’ll handle the standard stuff—blood counts, glucose, cholesterol, and all that—right at the local clinics. As for the more specialized tests that need specific storage conditions, I assume those will still be sent off to the big hospitals or major labs.

Personally, I don't see any downside here, provided they actually get organized. If they set it up like it used to be—where the clinic has dedicated hours for blood work, a specific room for it, and nurses whose sole job is drawing blood rather than juggling five hundred other tasks at once—then I'm on board.

At the end of the day, if it's a choice between dealing with those massive crowds at the main metropolitan hospital—where you're stuck in a room with 200 people coughing and sneezing all over you (which is just lovely when you're pregnant and nobody gives you priority, at least in my neck of the woods)—or just having my primary care nurse do it, I’ll take the second option every single time.
jadesailor14 jadesailor14 Regular
314 messages
joined May 2006
#12 ·
urbanpilot said:Honestly, I’ve heard the same thing about how things work elsewhere, and it sounds better to me. No more endless waiting, and no more playing tag with your doctor—you know the drill: sprinting to the clinic one day for a referral, dragging yourself to the lab the next morning before 8 AM sharp just to get blood drawn, then trekking back in the afternoon to wait around for your doctor to actually look at the results.
As for the nurses' credentials? If they're qualified enough to handle IVs and injections, I don't see why they can't pull blood, too.

But they mentioned that at general practices, blood will still only be drawn in the mornings.
So, you’re basically stuck with the same routine.
You'll show up in the afternoon, then have to come back again the next morning for the blood draw, wait for processing, and then return the following day anyway.

I totally see how this works for smaller towns; it makes things much easier for patients there.
But honestly, in huge cities like New York City, I don't really see the point.
Plus, think about all the extra costs for transport and all that stuff.
It actually stresses me out thinking about it—I already spend 2 or 3 hours waiting at my doctor's office now, so I can only imagine the wait times once this new system kicks in.
Apparently, they said patient flow will actually slow down while the nurse is busy drawing blood, if what they're saying is true.
Paul Johnson Paul Johnson Member
37 messages
joined Nov 2015
#13 ·
My thoughts?
I think I’ll stick to private labs. 😉
Just like I can't stand seeing 120 people crammed into a tiny, airtight waiting room at a local clinic or hospital, I refuse to accept those same conditions being moved into a primary care doctor's office.
And all those seniors with their daily health complaints—now they'll be stuck sitting in a GP's waiting room just to get bloodwork done. As if they aren't there often enough already. 🙄

And what about the pediatricians? Are kids still going to separate labs for blood tests?
urbanpilot urbanpilot Active Member
72 messages
joined Feb 2011
#14 ·
jadesailor14 said:But they mentioned that at general practices, blood will still only be drawn in the mornings.
So, you’re basically stuck with the same routine.
You'll show up in the afternoon, then have to come back again the next morning for the blood draw, wait for processing, and then return the following day anyway.

I totally see how this works for smaller towns; it makes things much easier for patients there.
But honestly, in huge cities like New York City, I don't really see the point.
Plus, think about all the extra costs for transport and all that stuff.
It actually stresses me out thinking about it—I already spend 2 or 3 hours waiting at my doctor's office now, so I can only imagine the wait times once this new system kicks in.
Apparently, they said patient flow will actually slow down while the nurse is busy drawing blood, if what they're saying is true.

I'm not buying it. If everything has to be done in the morning, fine—I'll just wake up earlier and head straight to my primary doctor. If I need blood work, they'll just do it right there. Results go straight to the clinic, and that's that.
jadesailor14 jadesailor14 Regular
314 messages
joined May 2006
#15 ·
urbanpilot said:I'm not buying it. If everything has to be done in the morning, fine—I'll just wake up earlier and head straight to my primary doctor. If I need blood work, they'll just do it right there. Results go straight to the clinic, and that's that.

They do the blood draws at the start of the morning shift—they mentioned 7:00 or 8:00 AM. They don't see patients during that window, and once that block is over, they stop drawing blood for the day.
You could show up at 4:00 AM if you really wanted, but the doctor won't see you until after 8:00 anyway, so you might as well just come back the day after tomorrow for your labs.
Basically, you can walk whenever you want; you just have to make sure you hit that one specific location.
Kyle Lee7 Kyle Lee7 Active Member
149 messages
joined Nov 2007
#16 ·
Just a few blocks away from my primary care physician, there’s a Quest Diagnostics center. It’s super convenient—you get your referral from the doctor, head over, and they get you in and out really quickly. They send all the results directly to my doctor, too. If everything looks normal, I just get a call and don't even have to swing back by the clinic unless something actually needs attention.
I honestly hope it stays this way. I mean, if things keep running this smoothly, why would they ever need to close down a facility like that??
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#17 ·
Kyle Lee7 said:Just a few blocks away from my primary care physician, there’s a Quest Diagnostics center. It’s super convenient—you get your referral from the doctor, head over, and they get you in and out really quickly. They send all the results directly to my doctor, too. If everything looks normal, I just get a call and don't even have to swing back by the clinic unless something actually needs attention.
I honestly hope it stays this way. I mean, if things keep running this smoothly, why would they ever need to close down a facility like that??

I don't buy the idea that they're closing anything. From what I can tell, labs are staying put. You'll still be able to get bloodwork done. At least as I see it, we'll have more options—either head to a major facility or just do it through our primary care physician.🤷
Casey Rogers47 Casey Rogers47 Member
43 messages
joined Jan 2007
#18 ·
melloworca6 said:I’m guessing they’ll handle the standard stuff—blood counts, glucose, cholesterol, and all that—right at the local clinics. As for the more specialized tests that need specific storage conditions, I assume those will still be sent off to the big hospitals or major labs.

Personally, I don't see any downside here, provided they actually get organized. If they set it up like it used to be—where the clinic has dedicated hours for blood work, a specific room for it, and nurses whose sole job is drawing blood rather than juggling five hundred other tasks at once—then I'm on board.

At the end of the day, if it's a choice between dealing with those massive crowds at the main metropolitan hospital—where you're stuck in a room with 200 people coughing and sneezing all over you (which is just lovely when you're pregnant and nobody gives you priority, at least in my neck of the woods)—or just having my primary care nurse do it, I’ll take the second option every single time.

I couldn't agree more.
We really need to find a way to cut down these wait times. If a doctor is seeing somewhere between 30 and 40 patients a day, most of them—maybe only about ten or fifteen—actually need bloodwork done. A nurse can wrap up a draw and label the vials in maybe three minutes flat. If you’re the fifth person in line when you hand over your insurance card, you shouldn't be stuck sitting there for fifteen or twenty minutes. It just doesn't make sense.
There are two main reasons why they’re switching to this new way of drawing blood.
I’m pretty sure the traffic is going to thin out, but hey, only time will tell.
Kyle Lee7 Kyle Lee7 Active Member
149 messages
joined Nov 2007
#19 ·
On a good day, my primary care doctor sees about 60 patients, but on the rough days? It can hit 90. Don't ask me how I know... if they start adding blood draws to the mix, they might as well clock in at 4:00 AM. If you have a clinic with a lighter schedule, you're lucky; this place runs like a literal assembly line.

I’ve also figured out the rhythm of the lab work here. Since they open from 7:00 to 9:00, the sweet spot is arriving just a few minutes before 9:00. I’m always running a little behind, so when I rush in right before 9:00, there are only a couple of people ahead of me, and I’m usually done by 9:00 sharp.
One time, I actually showed up right at 7:00—heaven knows what I was thinking—and it was a total madhouse. There were over 30 people waiting!
I honestly don't get the obsession with showing up at 7:00 on the dot, or even worse, 6:45.
Yet, between 8:30 and 9:00, the place is practically empty.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#20 ·
Kyle Lee7 said:On a good day, my primary care doctor sees about 60 patients, but on the rough days? It can hit 90. Don't ask me how I know... if they start adding blood draws to the mix, they might as well clock in at 4:00 AM. If you have a clinic with a lighter schedule, you're lucky; this place runs like a literal assembly line.

I’ve also figured out the rhythm of the lab work here. Since they open from 7:00 to 9:00, the sweet spot is arriving just a few minutes before 9:00. I’m always running a little behind, so when I rush in right before 9:00, there are only a couple of people ahead of me, and I’m usually done by 9:00 sharp.
One time, I actually showed up right at 7:00—heaven knows what I was thinking—and it was a total madhouse. There were over 30 people waiting!
I honestly don't get the obsession with showing up at 7:00 on the dot, or even worse, 6:45.
Yet, between 8:30 and 9:00, the place is practically empty.

The bolded part is an understatement.

It’s a total disaster where I live. All the basic tests are handled at the main community health center. They start handing out referrals from 7 to 8, but by 7:00, the pile of paperwork is already thicker than a textbook. You usually end up sitting there with hundreds of people—honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if there were over 300 during the winter—just waiting to be called. Sometimes you're stuck there for an hour and a half, maybe two.
For me, the absolute worst part is that pregnant women have to go there for bloodwork and urine samples too. They don't get any priority; they just have to sit in a waiting room packed with sick people.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads