Ryan Torres27 said:It went down like this. My mom started complaining about chest pains, went to the bathroom, and just collapsed. We turned her on her side and made sure her airway was clear. She was struggling to breathe. The paramedics arrived within three to five minutes, and once they got there, they started CPR. Then she went into clinical death, and they had to use defibrillators and adrenaline to bring her back before rushing her to the hospital. Once at the hospital, she underwent an emergency procedure where they placed two stents; they found out she actually had a heart attack over four years ago that nobody ever knew about. After the procedure, she went into arrest again, and even with the shocks, she fell into a coma. This all happened overnight between Tuesday and Wednesday, and she’s been stable since. They tried weaning her off the sedatives, but she started getting agitated and fighting it, so they put her back on them until she recovers. Her heart rhythm is okay, but she’s still on a ventilator. The doctors say now we just wait for her to wake up and see what happens next. I'm wondering if you have any experience with this—like how long a coma lasts and all that. I've been reading that about 50% of people die from a heart attack within the first hour, and about 45% pass away in the following four or five days. Have you dealt with patients like this before?!
Okay, things are a bit clearer now. You haven't told me which specific unit she's in yet, and honestly, that makes a huge difference. When you say she's "on a ventilator," do you mean she's wearing an oxygen mask, or is there an actual tube down her throat for mechanical ventilation?
Part of what you said regarding the stents and the surgery seems a little confused. In medical terms, "surgery" usually implies something like opening the chest for a bypass, whereas placing stents is considered an intervention rather than a full surgical operation. It sounds like a small distinction, but it matters for understanding the situation because those are two very different levels of intensity, even if the goal is the same: fixing the heart.
Regarding your original question... it’s honestly pretty reckless for the doctors over there to claim that "
the stent procedure went well without complications and now we're just waiting for her to wake up"...😕...I mean, are they for real?... You can't say something like that about someone who clearly suffered a massive, serious myocardial infarction (and isn't even a first-timer), who required resuscitation, and who might have sustained neurological damage due to prolonged hypoxia...😕....that's just totally wild!...
The body isn't some car where you swap out a part and then "just wait for the engine to turn over and drive away."....it's unbelievable!...🙄....
Regardless of the stents, that heart attack caused real damage to the muscle. A stent helps get blood flowing again through revascularization, but it’s not a magic wand that makes the previous damage disappear. It’s impossible to know how much damage was done to the heart tissue or how much function can actually be recovered with the stent.
Looking at everything you've described and her current state... unfortunately, your mother is a very critical patient and is undeniably still in a life-threatening situation. I don't usually like to "play doctor" on forums because the attending physician has the best view of the situation... but there's no room here for thinking "everything is fine, we're just waiting for her to wake up"... that's just irresponsible...
I'm trying to put myself in your shoes... When you go to visit her, try asking these specific questions:
1. What were her initial troponin levels upon admission, and what are they showing now? It's crucial to see a downward trend. Also, ask about her cardiac output (CO or CI) and whether there are signs of decompensation or, heaven forbid, cardiogenic shock.
2. Are there any signs of neurological damage from the prolonged hypoxia during that gap between losing consciousness and getting them breathing on their own again? That "twitching" or restlessness you mentioned, along with any issues with spontaneous breathing while they're on the ventilator, could point toward some neurological deficits. Since it’s been a few days since everything went down, I'd wonder if they've run a brain CT or MRI yet to check for any visible lesions.
3. What does the PV look like—did they actually hit those target numbers? This is huge because we don't want those stents to clot off. Usually, doctors will put patients on a low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent that kind of thing.
4. How are the lungs holding up? Being stuck on a ventilator for an extended period almost always leads to stuff like pneumonia, fluid buildup, or atelectasis. You might want to ask the medical team if they plan on keeping them ventilated and when they intend to perform a tracheostomy. It’s a big deal; getting a percutaneous tracheostomy done early for someone who's been on a vent for a few days can really help with weaning them off the machine and just makes lung ventilation much more effective overall.
4. Is the patient getting nutrition through a feeding tube, and is it enough? There's no point in all the meds and interventions if they aren't actually getting calories into their stomach via a tube.
5. If they aren't using a feeding tube, then they absolutely need to be getting nutrition intravenously through a central line. And I don't mean just a basic glucose and electrolyte drip... they need actual parenteral nutrition formulas like Aminomix, Kabiven, or Intralipid.
6. Is there a physical therapist working with her on passive exercises? Or maybe even some range-of-motion work if that's allowed?
....
Man, my mind is just racing with questions here... honestly, your best bet is to just lay these out to the staff right where you are. And please, don't let them brush you off with vague nonsense like "everything is fine, we're just waiting for them to wake up." Hang in there...