CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Attachment size limits

Attachment size limits

Started by James Turner3 · · 👁 4 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants James Turner3silentsailor5Jose Barrett
James Turner3 James Turner3 MemberOP
21 messages
joined Jan 2009
#1 ·
Why on earth is the maximum attachment size so tiny? It’s a pathetic, stingy 9.8 KB.
Nobody posts images like this, and honestly, you could barely even squeeze a tiny GIF into 9.8 KB, if you're lucky. But the real issue is trying to upload PDFs or PSD files, which are actually useful for certain threads. This ridiculous 9.8 KB limit makes that impossible. I mean, who in their right mind thinks that's enough for any kind of PDF or PSD file?
If they're going to set an limit this small, they might as well not have one at all. It just makes this site look like it's trying to be generous when, in reality, it's being incredibly cheap.
silentsailor5 silentsailor5 Member
46 messages
joined Mar 2009
#2 ·
James Turner3 said:Why on earth is the maximum attachment size so incredibly small? A pathetic, stingy 9.8 KB.
Nobody actually posts images this way, and even then, 9.8 KB might barely cover a tiny GIF, if you're lucky. The real issue lies with PDF or PSD files, which are incredibly useful for specific discussions, yet we are completely hamstrung by this ridiculous 9.8 KB limit. Honestly, who would believe that such a tiny amount is sufficient for any kind of PDF or PSD file?
In my view, if the limit is going to be this restrictive, it would be better to scrap it entirely; the way things are currently set up, the forum just looks like it's being generous when, in reality, it is being incredibly cheap.

I am inclined to agree; I believe the feature should simply be removed altogether. While these restrictions usually exist to manage server load, it would be more logical to eliminate the attachment option entirely and just have everyone use external upload services instead.
James Turner3 James Turner3 MemberOP
21 messages
joined Jan 2009
#3 ·
I don't know, maybe it would crash the servers if they let us use larger PSD or PDF files, since then probably not enough people would actually be using them lol
James Turner3 James Turner3 MemberOP
21 messages
joined Jan 2009
#4 ·
So, I’m seeing zero points here, right?
Jose Barrett Jose Barrett Member
48 messages
joined Jun 2009
#5 ·
Good topic.

Honestly, showing the attachment size is pretty pointless. It doesn’t actually help anyone, so we might as well just disable it.

Maybe it served some purpose back in the day—like seven or eight years ago—but nowadays, it's just clutter.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads