CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Estée Lauder and the "reformulation" PDF

Estée Lauder and the "reformulation" PDF

Started by Brian Mitchell44 · · 👁 6 views · 28 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Brian Mitchell44Charles Newman3Aaron Barrett6George Brown7Rebecca Cruz51Drew Gonzalez75Alex Hall4Jacob Barnes5wearycobraJose Taylor17Bradley Thomas85velvetcanyon92Keith Thomas11Andrew Foster20Kyle King4Aaron Harris2Raymond Sanchez7hollowtrucker77George Robertsplacidfox55Megan Reed3
Rebecca Cruz51 Rebecca Cruz51 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2009
#21 ·
Angela Flores76 said:Yeah, I actually wanted to ask if anyone—specifically the admins—could just post something on this thread? 😕 👎

Hey girls, since we haven't gotten a single decent answer by now, I feel like the conclusion is pretty obvious. Isn't silence basically just giving the green light? It feels like everything we've pointed out is spot on. It seems like there's some weird motive to mess with our PDF, even though it makes zero sense to try and wreck such a harmless file. But hey, whatever. 🙄
Honestly, I think it’s time for our photos, swatches, and reviews to find a new home on a different Reddit community or somewhere else out there in the vastness of the internet. 😁
Aaron Harris2 Aaron Harris2 Member
41 messages
joined Jan 2008
#22 ·
Where on earth are those fashion trends you were all boasting about at the beginning?

Perhaps you should focus on addressing your own concerns first... 🙂
Otherwise (and I truly hate to say this), there is simply no point...

Best of luck to the most beautiful women on Reddit. 😉
Brian Mitchell44 Brian Mitchell44 MemberOP
48 messages
joined Feb 2006
#23 ·
Aaron Harris2 said:Where did all those precious little "trends" you were bragging about at the start go?

If they actually cared about their own business, maybe they’d step up... 🙂
Otherwise (and I hate to be the one to say it), there is just no point...

Good luck to the "finest ladies" on this Reddit. 😉

They went ahead and wrote that they basically can't do anything at all, which—fine—isn't exactly news to me, though I suppose it shouldn't be a shock, right? 😳 But that doesn't mean they can't answer a few simple questions. It isn't as if we're demanding everything go back to how it was ten years ago; we're just asking for a response to my original post. That should be possible, shouldn't it?
Raymond Sanchez7 Raymond Sanchez7 Member
23 messages
joined Aug 2008
#24 ·
I decided one day to finally revisit my favorite topic on a subreddit like Face or maybe Body Care, only to find out that everything has been completely overhauled😲
It seems to me that the admins and moderators are once again playing God, because apparently, they still need to mess with everyone's heads a little longer🤷
I truly cannot fathom the necessity of this massive overhaul for such an essential community, especially when there is more than enough work to be done regarding moderation duties and handling user appeals—which, if they are too complicated, could simply be closed so they can actually deal with them properly.
To the dear admins and owners: without the users, you wouldn't even exist, and perhaps the moderators should take a moment to remember their roots and who they were before they ascended to the Olympic support initiative😉
I am certainly supporting the initiative🤷
Keith Thomas11 Keith Thomas11 Member
41 messages
joined Nov 2006
#25 ·
hollowtrucker77, I’ve got a question—and I’ll probably have to ask it again if everyone’s brain is fried from reading this thread to the end—what are the actual arguments for the reform? And I mean real arguments, not just some total nonsense.
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#26 ·
I honestly can't give you a straight answer on that one
arguments were basically flying back and forth between the mods and the admins, and it looks like the admins eventually decided—or maybe they even pushed for it—that this was the better way to go
to be perfectly clear, I haven't had any skin in this game whatsoever
🙂
my entire role in all of this boils down to making sure this PDF stays readable
George Roberts George Roberts Member
10 messages
joined May 2007
#27 ·
I find this entire thread quite amusing, though I must say the conspiracy theories being floated here are even more ridiculous☕
regarding the idea that someone is intentionally sabotaging cosmetics 😂
While there have certainly been some changes, goodness, I don't think anyone's life truly depends on it; in a month's time, I suspect we won't even remember how things used to be😳
placidfox55 placidfox55 Active Member
118 messages
joined Dec 2002
#28 ·
Darren
Fashionista.
darren Avatar

Registered: Dec 2002.
Location: .
Posts: 7,520

Hey ladies... about a year ago, cosmetics used to just be a sub-section under the fashion sub-forum. We took a massive leap forward by pulling it out into its own main section and breaking it down into smaller niche boards; the admins gave us a shot at it back then.


I think Darren has a completely different take than I do.

I’ve been lurking on Reddit since the early 2000s, posting since the late 2000s, and I’ve been here since day one of the reformed Reddit 2002-e.

Cosmetics used to exist as just a few threads within the women's corner.

Then the Fashion and Cosmetics sub-forum was created, which was actually mostly just cosmetics. Eventually, they split apart. I wouldn't say "Cosmetics" was carved out of "Fashion." If anything, it was the opposite—Fashion broke away from the dominant Cosmetics hub that had been drawing huge crowds for years.

I refuse to believe Cosmetics is some tiny, insignificant little sub-forum that only formed a year ago.

Here is why I don't think last year's reorganization worked:

1. The sheer volume of cosmetic products is insane; everything stays relevant at once. If we don't stay organized, threads will just sink, resurface, or people will keep opening duplicate threads with new dates...

2. The number of women on this site interested in beauty is shockingly high!!! (Nine years ago, hardly anyone dared to mention an interest in lipsticks; today, everyone has their own theory of relativity or a PhD-level dissertation on lipstick 😁 , and honestly, good for them!!)

3. Interest groups are incredibly diverse. We need to allow multiple active threads to run simultaneously.

That's my two cents.
Megan Reed3 Megan Reed3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Mar 2009
#29 ·
I’ve been lurking around this forum for quite a while now, though I haven't really jumped in to post anything until just recently.☕

I’m actually standing right behind General Electric on this one.👍
I used to be absolutely obsessed with the cosmetics section, but lately, that spark just isn't there anymore...
It’s not that I’ve stopped checking in, but the truth is, the organization has become a total mess and it's getting impossible to navigate.
The beauty brands are scattered all over the place, and the hair care sections are just as disorganized.
It feels like you can't find anything anymore—or at least, that's my experience since I don't pay for those premium topic subscriptions.

In my opinion, the whole point of a community like this is to make sure the content is user-friendly and easy to browse for the actual members, rather than catering to people who aren't even reading it.
And honestly, the ladies on this forum have already made their feelings pretty clear.
👎👎👎

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads