#41 ·
Hey everyone.
Glad this didn't turn into a "who's better" ego trip. That’s usually how these things go.
I see people comparing different styles based on how they work on the street. Maybe I'm off base, but this is a self-defense forum. Nobody asks a pro football player 🙂 how much his corner kick technique translates to a street fight.
Funny enough, we had a similar debate at a recent coaching seminar. After talking it out for ages, we landed on a few points:
- "People training any kind of self-defense have a slightly better shot than those who don't. But anyone can get blindsided by a bottle to the head from behind."
- "Athletes are actually at a disadvantage compared to non-athletes in their specific discipline." This is because they subconsciously pull their punches or focus too much on the opponent due to sports rules.
- "Those of us working security (myself included until recently) know the best weapon in a brawl is having more people on your side." One-on-one fights aren't really reality anymore.
There are plenty of other things you can figure out through discussion, and it doesn't always have to be about fighting.
JFK: Some of you might know Matt Thornton, who does JFK. Honestly, he's a better grappler than half the masters I know or have watched. In his video series (7 DVDs, highly recommend!), he often mentions the massive gap between amateur athletes and Olympic-level ones. Basically, an Olympic-level Judo guy or wrestler will handle BJJ guys or UFC fighters without breaking a sweat. It brings us back to: "The man or the skill?"
So, I'd say watch yourself when attacking traditional martial arts. They aren't as bad as the typical UFC fighter thinks. Not everyone in self-defense needs to prove themselves in a ring. Let people do what they love.
And UFC is a sport. That's a good thing.
Glad this didn't turn into a "who's better" ego trip. That’s usually how these things go.
I see people comparing different styles based on how they work on the street. Maybe I'm off base, but this is a self-defense forum. Nobody asks a pro football player 🙂 how much his corner kick technique translates to a street fight.
Funny enough, we had a similar debate at a recent coaching seminar. After talking it out for ages, we landed on a few points:
- "People training any kind of self-defense have a slightly better shot than those who don't. But anyone can get blindsided by a bottle to the head from behind."
- "Athletes are actually at a disadvantage compared to non-athletes in their specific discipline." This is because they subconsciously pull their punches or focus too much on the opponent due to sports rules.
- "Those of us working security (myself included until recently) know the best weapon in a brawl is having more people on your side." One-on-one fights aren't really reality anymore.
There are plenty of other things you can figure out through discussion, and it doesn't always have to be about fighting.
JFK: Some of you might know Matt Thornton, who does JFK. Honestly, he's a better grappler than half the masters I know or have watched. In his video series (7 DVDs, highly recommend!), he often mentions the massive gap between amateur athletes and Olympic-level ones. Basically, an Olympic-level Judo guy or wrestler will handle BJJ guys or UFC fighters without breaking a sweat. It brings us back to: "The man or the skill?"
So, I'd say watch yourself when attacking traditional martial arts. They aren't as bad as the typical UFC fighter thinks. Not everyone in self-defense needs to prove themselves in a ring. Let people do what they love.
And UFC is a sport. That's a good thing.