CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Is streaming killing the art of cinema?

Is streaming killing the art of cinema?

Started by Nicholas Sullivan49 · · 👁 10 views · 95 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nicholas Sullivan49Joseph Edwards86Joseph Lee3Lawrence Booth2nimblenomad41William White2Anthony Davis6redowl90crimsonmoose3Brian WilliamsLarry Martin11Brian Mitchell44Raymond Palmer8Ryan Wood98Joshua Johnson67darksurfer26Joshua Bennett4nimblemarlin17shadowviper12Douglas Phillips4Alex Parker8Jose Miller17ironcrane7Sean Gomez4 …
William White2 William White2 Member
47 messages
joined Sep 2005
#41 ·
Lawrence Booth2 said:Go ahead, send me a screenshot showing exactly what kind of download speeds you're getting on these movies.

Pretty soon 😳
I might be facing some 🤣 hardware issues

It’s honestly starting to get a bit frustrating because I’m relying on my wireless connection, and even then, I’m only pulling about 500 Mbps through DC Comics.
Joshua Johnson67 Joshua Johnson67 Member
49 messages
joined Jul 2006
#42 ·
I’ve been thinking about Constantine lately... man, what a ride that whole story is. It’s one of those deep dives you just can't shake once you get started. There's something about that gritty, supernatural noir vibe that really hits different when you're looking for something with actual substance. It's not just your typical superhero fluff; it feels like there's real weight behind every choice made. Just sitting here reflecting on it all... it's wild how much it sticks with you... kaže:
The real kicker with DivX is that the audio quality is just on a whole different level... honestly, it's way better...Man, it’s honestly such a game-changer how easy it is to just hit a bookmark and jump straight back to your favorite scene whenever you want. You can rewatch that one killer moment a hundred times if you feel like it... whereas with those old VHS tapes, you had to deal with that super annoying, endless rewinding just to see the same thing again. It's night and day...


Look, it doesn't even matter if it's technically "true" or not, I just gotta vent about this... I've got these files sitting on my DivX collection that are driving me absolutely insane. First off, you've got movies like *Sympathy for the Devil* where there isn't even any audio at all—just dead silence. And then you have stuff like *Alien Apocalypse*, where the sound is so incredibly quiet that even when I crank every single setting to the max, I can barely hear a thing... It’s honestly ridiculous. Back in the day with DVDs, you never had to deal with this nonsense; the audio was always crystal clear and perfectly leveled. This whole digital file thing is such a headache compared to how reliable things used to be...
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#43 ·
robybaggio said:When it comes to DivX, I’m mostly interested in adult content because you can fit so many "movies" onto a hard drive or a DVD. It’s also handy for TV series since you can pack a ton of episodes onto a disc that way. But for actual movies? No thanks. I'll stick to the theater or a high-quality DVD.


👍

YES!
Lawrence Booth2 Lawrence Booth2 Regular
297 messages
joined Sep 2022
#44 ·
William White2 said:soon 😳
hardware technical issues 🤣

It’s driving me nuts—I’m running on wireless and trying to pull about 500 through DC Comics

Must be nice

But I’m sitting here wondering... if my limit is 120
and I'm pulling speeds of 15
sometimes even 5

how on earth are you getting more out of it?

And I’m talking about an emulator, not DC Comics😁😁😁
shadowviper12 shadowviper12 Active Member
50 messages
joined Jan 2016
#45 ·
Honestly, this whole debate over whether a DVD looks better than a DivX rip—you know, those high-quality rips—is basically the exact same nonsense as those guys arguing about how much different interconnect cables between a CD player and an amp actually change the sound. Look, I’m not saying people can't hear a difference, or see one, but does it really matter enough to totally ruin the experience of just sitting down and watching a movie? Come on man!!!! Don't you think this is all just a massive load of hype?
Honestly, trying to compare DivX to the cinema experience is just... I don't even know, man. It feels totally pointless at this stage—like, why are we even doing this? You're basically comparing watching a movie on your TV at home to being sitting in a massive theater with a giant screen and a sound system that shakes your bones. It’s two completely different worlds, you know?
I mean, let’s be real here—watching a DVD versus some decent DivX file on the exact same TV? It’s basically the same crap. Honestly, you aren't getting much of a difference at all once you're sitting on the couch.
Honestly, DivX is just king—period. There’s really no debate about it!
Nicholas Sullivan49 Nicholas Sullivan49 MemberOP
21 messages
joined Aug 2007
#46 ·
Please tell me how anyone could claim that watching DivX is the same as watching a DVD. The sound quality, the picture, even the subtitles are all inferior!!!
It’s like saying there’s no difference between listening to an MP3 and an original CD. Maybe some people won't notice the massive gap, but a true audiophile will toss that MP3 straight into the trash immediately...
shadowviper12 shadowviper12 Active Member
50 messages
joined Jan 2016
#47 ·
Look, if you actually want to spot any real difference in picture quality, you’ve gotta be staring at a high-res PC monitor...
As far as the sound goes, the thing with DivX is that it usually doesn't come with 5.1 surround—it’s just standard stereo—but honestly? For watching movies, it does the job perfectly fine for me, and I don't feel like there's any noticeable drop in quality at all!!
And subtitles? Man, if you put in even a little bit of effort to track down a decent subtitle file—and maybe sync it up if you have to—you basically end up with the exact same experience as watching a DVD...
I mean, obviously, I'm talking about a high-quality DVD rip here...

It’s fine if some self-proclaimed "audiophile" wants to toss an MP3 straight into the trash... whatever, let him. While he's busy treating CDs like junk, I’ll be over here enjoying my massive, practically endless music collection right in my own living room, all thanks to the MP3 format...
The exact same logic applies to DivX too.
William White2 William White2 Member
47 messages
joined Sep 2005
#48 ·
Lawrence Booth2 said:Must be nice

but I find myself wondering if my own limit is around 120
while I am pulling down at 15
or occasionally even just 5

how on earth are you managing to get anything higher

and I am talking about an emulator, not DC Comics😁😁😁

Well, I guess... I download directly from the main sites, whereas for movies and other stuff, I use the wireless connection, so I usually end up hitting my absolute ceiling anyway😁

I basically just buy internet from a friend who signed up for that high-end fiber plan that goes for something like $150 a month, so we stay connected via a VPN; normally I am stuck at about 40 kb/s because I don't really need much speed, but when I ask him, he can unlock it so I pull things down much faster😁
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#49 ·
shadowviper12 said:To actually spot any visual difference, you’d need to be using a high-res PC monitor...
Regarding audio, the main thing is that DivX usually lacks 5.1 surround and just gives you standard stereo. For watching movies, that works perfectly fine for me—I don't hear any noticeable drop in quality.
As for subtitles, if you put in a little effort to find a decent file and sync it up, it ends up looking just like a DVD...
Of course, I'm talking about a high-quality DVD rip here...

It's fine if some "true audiophile" wants to toss an MP3 straight into the trash. Honestly, who cares? While they're busy treating CDs like junk, I'll be over here enjoying my music collection, which is practically limitless thanks to the MP3 format...
The same logic applies to DivX.

You fool...
Douglas Phillips4 Douglas Phillips4 Active Member
70 messages
joined Apr 2003
#50 ·
shadowviper12 said:When it comes to audio, the difference is that DivX usually doesn't offer 5.1 surround; it’s just standard stereo. For watching movies, that works perfectly fine for me, and I don't feel any real loss in quality!!

Pairing it with Dolby Pro Logic makes it totally acceptable. Plus, there's a huge amount of DivX content featuring original AC3 audio and decent picture quality—it's basically the equivalent of two CDs 🙂

Someone mentioned this earlier, but our local distributors are total crooks. Most movies they put out are barely passable in terms of both video and audio, and DTS is practically unheard of here. Some releases looked like they were ripped straight from a VHS tape, honestly worse than most DivX files I've come across 🙄. Of course, everyone wants to lecture you about how DivX is piracy and copyright infringement and blah blah blah—but my personal take is that there needs to be some balance. Some things simply aren't worth sitting through when the quality is such a massive compromise. Then again, there are times I'd bang my head against a wall if I had paid $8.25 for a movie theater ticket... quite often, actually, and $4.00 I rarely regret spending 🙄 on a DVD. When I watch some nonsense on a DivX file, at least I find comfort in knowing I didn't drop 😬
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#51 ·
Douglas Phillips4 said:looking at how bad this looks on DivX, I guess the only silver lining is that I didn't pay for it 😬

What a fool...
shadowviper12 shadowviper12 Active Member
50 messages
joined Jan 2016
#52 ·
redowl90 said:You absolute fool...


Honestly, when someone hits you with logic like that, there’s just no fighting back—you're totally defeated.🙄
redowl90🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#53 ·
shadowviper12 said:There’s really no way to argue against logic like that.🙄
redowl90🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏


Look... if someone watches movies just so they can brag about seeing them before everyone else—and claims they don't care about quality or the actual viewing experience—then in my book, that person is just a fool.
William White2 William White2 Member
47 messages
joined Sep 2005
#54 ·
redowl90 said:Look... I suppose if someone watches movies strictly just to claim they saw them before everyone else, while completely ignoring the actual quality or the viewing experience itself—then, in my estimation, that person is a complete fool...

But I have to wonder, is the movie theater always truly the best way to experience a film? 😕
Even when you're stuck behind some annoying guy with his popcorn or someone sitting two feet away from you in your personal space 🙄

Or maybe it’s only better if you're renting a DVD from a local video rental shop, though even then you can never be quite sure if the disc is an original or just some bootleg, since it's been common knowledge for ages that some shops rent out pirated copies 🙄

And honestly, I'd bet anything you wouldn't even be able to tell the difference between a well-ripped DVD and the original version

In the end, for all the money you might have spent at the cinema or the rental store, you probably could have just put that toward a massive LCD TV and a comfortable recliner instead 😬
shadowviper12 shadowviper12 Active Member
50 messages
joined Jan 2016
#55 ·
So, you’ve got this guy who goes out and buys an official DVD just so he can brag about owning the "real deal" instead of using a rip?
What do you even call someone like that?

And honestly, I totally get where William White2 is coming from... there's nothing quite like being kicked back in your favorite recliner, feet up on the coffee table, a big bowl of buttery popcorn, and a cold beer in hand...
William White2 William White2 Member
47 messages
joined Sep 2005
#56 ·
If I had a pipe in my hand, I’d probably be happy just staring at the floor while watching this movie🤣
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#57 ·
William White2 said:So, isn't the theater always the best way to watch a movie? 😕
regardless of whether there's some annoying guy eating popcorn behind you or a giant sitting right in front of you 🙄

Of course the theater offers the best atmosphere...
Especially if you pick an early afternoon or late-night showing when the crowds thin out...

That’s really all there is to it...

The issue, though, is that "atmosphere" doesn't seem to mean much to some people... For them, it's all about finding the cheapest option possible... And that is 👎
William White2 William White2 Member
47 messages
joined Sep 2005
#58 ·
I mean, honestly, can you even top that kind of atmosphere? Just kicking back in your recliner in the middle of the States, beer in one hand and a bag of chips in the other, while you're basically running the show—barking orders like, "Turn it up! Bump the contrast to 60, set the brightness to 80..." 🤣
shadowviper12 shadowviper12 Active Member
50 messages
joined Jan 2016
#59 ·
Look, please forgive me for having my own weird, twisted idea about what would make for a perfect vibe... I was totally off base. Please, just point me in the right direction and get me back on track...
redowl90 redowl90 Regular
287 messages
joined Aug 2005
#60 ·
I mean, true... As long as there's alcohol involved and it doesn't break the bank, I'm happy.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads