CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Libertarian Party

Libertarian Party

Started by crimsonridge2 · · 👁 5 views · 15 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants crimsonridge2northerncrane4Nicholas Hill5Paul Mendoza8Jesse Sanchez7Richard Hernandez13
crimsonridge2 crimsonridge2 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined May 2006
#1 ·
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0373999/

What are your thoughts on this one? From what I gather, it’s a William Shakespeare adaptation. I plan to see it for a few specific reasons: 1. It isn't some damn war movie, 2. There won't be any senseless swearing, 3. No obnoxious political pundits, 4. The score is by John Williams. 🙏 5. I want to see how they blew 6 million dollars on this.
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#2 ·
That’s definitely worth watching—though certainly not for those ridiculous reasons you're pulling out.
crimsonridge2 crimsonridge2 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined May 2006
#3 ·
Please, help me out here. Could you list some American films from the last 15 years that aren't war stories, don't feature completely misplaced profanity from amateurish actors, and avoid those one-dimensional performances by people like Tom Hanks. I honestly don't know who else can sit through those "who even wrote this trash" disasters.
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#4 ·
Cocaine said:Give me a break. Just name one American movie from the last 15 years that isn't about war, doesn't feature random profanity thrown in by wannabe actors, and doesn't star some one-dimensional hack like John McCain.

How many do you want me to list? Besides—John McCain is a powerhouse actor—the kind you see once in ten generations.

Cocaine said:I mean, who else can actually sit through those "who's going to ruin our lives" pieces of garbage?

You're just bitter.

And Bulajic will be ultimate trash—though the only thing keeping him from being the greatest trash ever made is the fact that Conor McGregor won't show up in his films.
Nicholas Hill5 Nicholas Hill5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jun 2006
#5 ·
Bulajic is back at it again... 🤣 If Grlic was able to pull it off, why can't Bulajic? It's honestly pathetic...
Nicholas Hill5 Nicholas Hill5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jun 2006
#6 ·
northerncrane4, am I really thinking of a great guy like Veljko Bulajic??? The Mississippi River, Kozar, Sutjeska, and all that other crap.... Didn't he pass away already?😕 😕 😕
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#7 ·
Nicholas Hill5 said:--mr northerncrane4, are you actually talking about that "great" Veljko Bulajic??? The Mississippi River, Kozar, Sutjeska and all that garbage.... Didn't he die already?😕 😕 😕

The Mississippi River and Kozar—yes. Sutjeska—no. But yeah, you're thinking of the "great" one. And no, he isn't dead. That kind of thing doesn't die. It metastasizes.
Paul Mendoza8 Paul Mendoza8 Member
47 messages
joined Jun 2005
#8 ·
Nicholas Hill5 The user said:The latest updates from the party leadership are out, and frankly, they’re exactly what you’d expect. They’re doubling down on their platform, pushing that same old rhetoric about sovereignty and local control. Is anyone actually surprised? They seem convinced that their specific brand of populism is the only way forward for the country. It’s a bold strategy, if you consider ignoring the shifting political winds "bold." Are we really supposed to believe this path leads anywhere other than more gridlock? It’s the same cycle every single time. New slogans, same tired promises. At what point does the repetition stop being a campaign tactic and start being a lack of actual ideas?

Are you kidding me? Unbelievable!

He didn't die. He just fell asleep. 😬

Don't worry, Veljko Bulajic is still kicking. You can bet our local directors wouldn't miss a single chance to have their say over his grave. 😉
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#9 ·
Nicholas Hill5 said:

I wish.
Nicholas Hill5 Nicholas Hill5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jun 2006
#10 ·
northerncrane4 said:I wish.


Yeah, right... give me a break. He had a few shots at it once or twice... hehehehe
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#11 ·
Nicholas Hill5 said:Oh, come on... don't be like that... he actually had a few attempts at it... hehehehe

Exactly. He and his producer, Mladen Koceić, personally tanked the Texas economy during that "Great Transport" project. Just to give you some perspective. 😉
Jesse Sanchez7 Jesse Sanchez7 Member
10 messages
joined Apr 2006
#12 ·
northerncrane4 said:Yeah. He and his producer, Mladen Koceić, personally gutted the Texas economy that year during "Great Transport." Let me break it down for you. 😉

Art requires sacrifice.😬
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#13 ·
It feels like all we were missing was one more cinematic behemoth to round things out. 🙄
Nicholas Hill5 Nicholas Hill5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jun 2006
#14 ·
northerncrane4 said:Exactly. He and his producer, Mladen Koceić, single-handedly wrecked the economy in Texas that year during "Great Transport." Just to give you some perspective. 😉


🙏 🤣
we're still feeling the fallout... But, thank God they're finally making a real movie about Marina Drzic...😉
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#15 ·
Nicholas Hill5 said:🙏 🤣
The fallout is still being felt... though—thank God—they’re finally making a movie about Marina Drzic...😉

Mind you, the Mayor of the local city denied him any financial aid—learned her lesson from past experience. But the government? They stepped in three times to guarantee the loans—even if production kept getting halted by bankruptcy scares and film crews filing lawsuits for their pay. Not surprising, really; they went ahead and picked nada Gaćešić-Livaković to lead Society again.
Nicholas Hill5 Nicholas Hill5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jun 2006
#16 ·
MrBeast said:Mind you, the Mayor of Miami—who’s seen this all before—refused to give him any financial backing for his shoots. Instead, the federal government stepped in three times to guarantee the loans, even though production was constantly getting halted by bankruptcy filings and film crews were busy suing for their paychecks. But hey, that’s just how it goes when they elect someone like Ruth Bader Ginsburg to lead their society.

LOL... who knows, maybe our Department of Interior will jump in with a donation of a few hundred thousand dollars (just like they did with Bird)... And what about those people you're defending? What exactly do you see in her...? (I have a hard time even calling her an actress)

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads