CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › One-Take Film Festival

One-Take Film Festival

Started by Anthony Reyes5 · · 👁 4 views · 15 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Reyes5Richard Hernandez13Justin Patelslyrider16Christian Sanchez44Anthony Harris14Elizabeth Wells31Karen White8Nicole BakerSean Wilson53steelstag4Jose Miller17
Anthony Reyes5 Anthony Reyes5 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Apr 2003
#1 ·
From November 19th to the 21st, theaters like Central Park and the Atlantic Ocean will be hosting this one-of-a-kind festival featuring films shot entirely in a single take.
More details here: www.onetakefilmfestival.com/

Now we just have to see if these directors care more about technical gimmicks than actual substance...

And, yeah, let’s be real—Michael Winterbottom’s film 9 Songs is pretty explicit, so I'm expecting a packed house, haha.

Oh, and again! You can expect the unexpected at this festival, whatever that might end up looking like... 🙂
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#2 ·
9 Songs Michael Winterbottom was filmed in just one single shot?!? 🤔
Justin Patel Justin Patel Active Member
117 messages
joined Sep 2003
#3 ·
Richard Hernandez13 said:9 Songs Michael Winterbottom was shot in a single take?!? 🤔


Even if it wasn't, he's basically a special guest star—like a walking film bar—so he can get away with it...
slyrider16 slyrider16 Active Member
60 messages
joined Mar 2006
#4 ·
The festival basically runs three different tracks. First, there’s the main competition—mostly just low-budget indie flicks shot on video fighting for an award.
Then you’ve got this "almost one" side program. These are high-quality entries that didn't quite make the cut for the main competition, even though they're known for those long, complex shots.

Finally, there's the guest program, which I think includes 9 Songs Michael Winterbottom. Unlike the first two, the organizers actually hand-picked these themselves, specifically looking for films with those heavy, drawn-out takes. We're talking actual feature films and docs here, not just video stuff.
That's about it.
Christian Sanchez44 Christian Sanchez44 Active Member
67 messages
joined Jul 2005
#5 ·
slyrider16 said:then you have this "almost one-take" side program—films that were submitted for competition which are high quality, even if they don't strictly stick to a single shot, despite being characterized by those long, complicated takes.

😂
This whole festival is just plain overreaching.
Last year—or was it the year before?—when it launched, it was actually pretty great because they had works from Andrei Tarkovsky, but now they're biting off way more than they can chew.
It’s not like it's easy to find a massive pile of actual one-take films... so now we have "almost one-take"... and in a couple of years, we'll probably be watching some Schizopolis directed by Soderbergh (doesn't matter that it isn't a one-take, it's still a good movie!) 😁

I agree that it's nice to have a chance to see what people are doing with single shots... but calling itself OneTakeFF... that's... well, if nothing else, it's certainly bold.😍

They've got The Rope by Alfred Hitchcock in the mix, so I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually added a section for retrospective one-take classics...😍

In the meantime, though, we're basically turning into Colombia. *Tsk tsk.* 😁
Anthony Harris14 Anthony Harris14 Active Member
63 messages
joined Aug 2004
#6 ·
It’s like these FF types have been swarming in lately, much like the crowds during the Miss USA pageant.👍
Elizabeth Wells31 Elizabeth Wells31 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2004
#7 ·
Whatever, the main feature was just one continuous take. At least for now.

Thanks to the organizers for the free drinks. Though maybe we didn't even need them... yikes...

Anyway, enough about my struggles. Let's talk movies.

It felt like they were lined up by quality from worst to best, so when the last film (genius, btw) finally ends, you’re sitting there all hyped up realizing an entire hour of the main program just vanished and that was it for the night. A pretty clear sign of a limited selection of films to choose from, I guess.

First was Ascension, Australian if I remember right. A stylistic exercise—a nice one with good music, but nothing more. Just subway escalators and one woman.

Then the Mexican version of Cast Away, which was a decent exercise in story structure. The plot repeats cyclically, revealing new elements until everything is laid bare. It reminds me of something, but I can't quite place it. Still, that's a positive thing I can say. The acting was terrible, the plot felt like it was written by a random Script generator tailored for the Mexican market. Corrupt cops, dealers, a family murder, and way too many "puta madre" and "joder" lines.

Next, the British Sleep tight, my baby. The organizers clearly assumed the young, urban, hip crowd (including Maja Freundlich) knows English well enough that subtitles weren't necessary. With English like this, they definitely needed them. But whatever, not a huge deal; just a dysfunctional family and a lot of "fucks." A really fine black-and-white film with a dark twist and a fantasy sequence at the end (not sure how much I should say about this, someone might actually go out and buy it). That final sequence is a masterclass in low budgets—all you need is a little imagination, which in this case meant the lead actor using his twin sister as a stunt double (or actress?).

Nest, Australian again, is a total drag! Some woman behind me kept grumbling about how boring it was. Not entirely wrong, though; the movie is basically just close-ups of the narrator's face, who mumbles incoherently over some clicking sounds, making the whole thing sound deeply unsettling. Subtitles crawl along the bottom so we can follow the story about him needing to remove a wasp nest from his tenants' house. Very atmospheric stuff.

Dmitri is a documentary about some guy (presumably Russian) getting out of a UK prison. It shows about ten minutes of his walk from the cell to the outside. His broken English and sheer luck are endearing, but overall, it didn't leave much of an impression on me.

But the last one is a beast. Take it Back from Ireland. Hide yourself, Christopher Nolan 😁 it's a powerful story about a horrific misunderstanding, told in reverse. What I found particularly fascinating was the visual style. At first glance, it doesn't look like the film is being played backward; it looks like the actors are simply acting weirdly. But things like hair and clothing show that the footage *is* actually reversed, since human movements don't have that obvious unnaturalness you get from a reverse projection. Which would imply they were acting forward but doing everything backward, or something... ugh... I'm not really in the headspace to explain it properly today 😬 🙂 anyway, damn near genius.

Let me wrap this long rant up. Even with the free drinks, people didn't stick around for the afterparty. Why? Because after a certain point, the vibe got depressing. The poor DJ was trying so hard, but it was useless; the place was totally empty, so we headed out around midnight.
slyrider16 slyrider16 Active Member
60 messages
joined Mar 2006
#8 ·
Christian Sanchez44 said:😂
this whole festival is just massive hype for nothing.

If you ask me, they’re making way too much of a big deal out of this thing. Honestly, enough one-shot films get made every year to justify having a festival at all. Hell, some people probably start filming just to try and get in. But let’s be real—it’s mostly amateur stuff, and the main lineup is always gonna look like that. You basically have an amateur film fest on one hand, and then this side program filled with actual movies that's three times bigger and has way more catchy titles to draw people in.

Personally, I wasn't feeling that Andrei Tarkovsky flick last year at all, but if it had been the big headline act, people would've lost their minds. Once you strip away the noise, this year feels just like the last. I’d even say the main lineup is slightly better this time around... but whatever, you need like five or six years of data before you can actually call it a trend.

They should just focus on the main lineup. Use what they've got and move on. That's it.
Karen White8 Karen White8 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2004
#9 ·
Last year, the jury handed out an award to "musical chair," only to realize later that the whole thing wasn't even shot in a single take. When asked how it even made the cut, Samanovic basically shrugged it off—saying that, technically, you could argue it's a one-take film, but then admitted they probably should have picked something that actually used that technique. 😲
Elizabeth Wells31 Elizabeth Wells31 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2004
#10 ·
Well, last night was an absolute rock bottom. Total zero. I missed the festival last year, so I’m wondering if it was always this pointless? I mean, if they can't pull together three hours of actual content from a whole year of production, then honestly...

I guess they just threw everything worth watching into the first night for the opening or whatever...

It kicked off with some British film about people standing in a line. But—get this—they DON'T KNOW why they're in line! How controversial. They say things like, "Can somebody help me? I've lost something but I can't remember what." Then the camera pans around a building and we see... well... the end of the line is actually its BEGINNING!!! That existential weight just floored me.
It's been a long time since I've seen anything this stupid. The acting was terrible too. At least it was shot with a decent camera in black and white so it looks okay, but that doesn't help. Even free sandwiches wouldn't save this one.

Then we get some work by what I assume is a Bavarian high schooler who picked up a ridiculous camera and spent ten minutes filming himself talking nonsense. It was so unnecessary and meaningless that it was almost charming at times (especially when he plays guitar and improvises some deep lyrics where being a great Human is central), but this is supposed to be a festival. Someone actually accepted this and decided to show it on a big screen in a massive hall at an *international* (not a middle school) festival. Why?

Next, we got to enjoy a few minutes of static footage showing absolutely nothing happening in some industrial setting, set to some industrial noise soundtrack, I guess. So deep and original. But look, everything moves slowly, and moves. And it stays like that for several more minutes (which, fine, it looks alright). The thing is, this is experimental *video* that some student probably whipped up at the last minute just to get credit, and it's just barely passable. I really don't get why it's at a *film* festival. Sure, it has one shot. So what?
After that, I mentioned to a friend that they could just show news anchors reading the news, since that's usually just one shot too. I didn't know my own powers...

Then, a miracle. Cape Cod, a *film* that's actually good, witty (not funny, but witty) and short. In a better world, this would have been a wicked joke by the programmer about how the rest of the evening was mindless, pretentious garbage. But since that same person is responsible for the garbage, the joke feels too long and the point gets lost. We just see one striking static shot of a room. Only the light changes as the sun comes up, and finally, two dead bodies become visible. Atmospheric, simple, and very short. Exactly measured, which is more than I can say for anything else last night.

Morning news (*ahem*) and a singing bird. An anchor reads the news (basically listing various utopias). Am I psychic or what? One absurd little gag, because the scene basically rotates, showing nothing but wine in a bottle and a little bird turning in its cage. This would have been a cute filler elsewhere, but if this filler is one of only two decent works all night, then screw it.

Then things continue to go downhill. No, they go into a freefall.

Something with an apple. I was fascinated by how she managed to peel it in one continuous motion. Impressive.

Something with food. I was fascinated by how she managed to eat everything on the plate using only two spoons without helping herself. This is... a little hard to explain exactly.

Something with a damn leaf. Someone levitates a leaf for 10 damn minutes. I assume using one of those little handheld fans that drains batteries instantly. This is trash. Pure trash. I'll just take my digital camera and film 40 seconds of running water. I'm sure they'll show that next year. When I mentioned this to a friend, they suggested I could submit it to a one-minute film festival. I'd be a star.

Do programmers actually know the difference between a *film* in one shot and just a random, irrelevant shot?

It ended with some Iranian movie. I couldn't stay objective if I tried—I was in a terrible mood. The fact that it wasn't actually terrible probably just meant my standards had hit rock bottom because there was nothing else playing. Honestly, the only entertainment I got was from subtitles riddled with typos and random, aggressive capitalization. Oh, and this is the first movie I've ever seen that uses numbered footnotes. It also featured the first set of subtitles I've encountered—aside from closed captioning—that included stage directions. <recites poetry in a sarcastik way> is one of them.
Nicole Baker Nicole Baker Member
12 messages
joined Dec 2002
#11 ·
Well... I suppose I wasn't thinking clearly... I actually picked this exact weekend to head back home... and I had already made plans to attend that festival... I guess my timing just hasn't been particularly great lately. 😢
Sean Wilson53 Sean Wilson53 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2003
#12 ·
Yeah, I get that, but honestly, that’s just because it’s a side program—you know, like a special spotlight on Hirokaze Kore-Eda, plus some deep-cut 60s documentaries that basically paved the way for the whole Free Cinema and Cinéma Vérité movements, topped off with a few killer newer flicks. 👍
steelstag4 steelstag4 Active Member
99 messages
joined Dec 2002
#13 ·
I didn't make it out there, but honestly, after reading Elizabeth Wells31's post, I can't say I'm losing any sleep over it. Seriously though, kudos on that write-up—I was absolutely losing it laughing my head off. 🤣

My only real regret is missing out on what Brenda Martinez4 was getting at, specifically regarding
those 60s documentaries that basically kickstarted the Free Cinema and Cinéma Vérité movements

:kmeeeeee:
slyrider16 slyrider16 Active Member
60 messages
joined Mar 2006
#14 ·
Tonight was the final night of the main lineup, basically the last supper of screenings. Total letdown. Looks like Friday was actually the peak... Honestly, 90% of what they showed was straight garbage—pretentious, cheap philosophy, just overacting... *Surface and Time Take #4* would’ve been the king of this mess. It was just 10 minutes of a static shot of some construction site. And it was such a long shot you couldn't even see anything besides the building. The sound design was trash too, totally pointless... a complete disaster. The only things that saved the night were that Italian flick 'Once Upon a Time a King,' which looked pretty but was conceptually hollow... and those American ones, 'Artifacts'... I guess it was okay, probably just some amateur Hollywood knockoff made by some college kid.

To wrap things up, I couldn't help myself and stayed for Kiarostami's Quote : documentary *Pet*. Good grief, I thought last year's selection was a black hole... but this is way worse. Whatever, at least the first half was tolerable, then I just walked out. 👎
Jose Miller17 Jose Miller17 Active Member
162 messages
joined Sep 2003
#15 ·
Elizabeth Wells31 said:This whole festival thing is just massive overhype.
Last year, when they started (or was it the year before?), it was actually cool because they had Sokurov, but now they’re clearly biting off more than they can chew.
It’s not easy to find a mountain of actual one-take films... we barely have enough for one... so in a year or two, we'll basically be living in Soderbergh's Schizopolis (doesn't matter that it isn't a single shot, it's still a great movie!) 😁
I get that it's nice to see what people can pull off in a single shot... but calling itself the OneTakeFF... that's... well, if nothing else, it's certainly bold. 😍
They even have TheRope by Alfred Hitchcock, so I wouldn't be surprised if they added a section for retrospective one-take classics...😍
In the meantime, we'll probably just turn into Colombia. smh 😁

Hehe... well put...
Elizabeth Wells31 Elizabeth Wells31 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2004
#16 ·
el Duderino said:About 90% of these movies were basically trash—cheap philosophy and overacting. The king of them all was Surface and Time Take #4. Ten minutes of a static shot of a construction site. It’s such a long shot you can barely see anything but a building. The sound design is weak and pointless too... a total disaster.

The only thing that confuses me is why that movie didn't win, especially since it doesn't "appeal to the audience," which was one of the reasons they gave for choosing Ascension 🙄

Given how stupid the last two nights were, Ascension (they translated it as "rise above oneself" 🙄) looks like a masterpiece. But honestly, it's nothing special; there were plenty of better films on the first night. They say Take It Back was a "shortlisted" contender. Maybe they skipped it because people actually liked it, who knows.

The newsletter claimed that "a successful festival relies on three things: large crowds, a great lineup, and a good sponsor. We achieved one of those," or something like that. I don't remember perfectly. Was that supposed to be a witty joke, or is the writer just acknowledging the reality? I can't tell. There were crowds, and the sponsor was Target. So there.

Oh, and keep in mind that the cinematographer for the "film" Welcome is none other than Vedran Šamanović 🙄

And I don't want to be rude, but I did enjoy the free beer. 😬

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads