Richard Howard2 said:I still don't think you really get it. Honestly, even the humor in Shrek is on a much higher level than what you see in Monsters, Inc. and stuff like that.
Look, man, think whatever you want.
Richard Howard2 said:By any normal standards, I guess Princess Fiona would have ended up turning into Belle at the end.
But not when they’re trying to prove some kind of "point" to millions of little kids. 😉
Richard Howard2 said:No, but Melissa Moore32 is over here trying to convince everyone that Shrek isn't actually anything special, mostly because of those specific things that aren't even in Monsters, Inc. yet or whatever!
Come on, Richard Howard2, you're starting to sound like a total pushover. 🙄
Monsters, Inc. actually has a sense of humor for the sake of being funny, you know? They aren't just trying to peddle some forced moral lessons or those cheesy friendship stories that only work on little kids. (And clearly, they’re working on you, too.)
I mean, I’ll take an animated movie like that any day over those films that constantly brag about being "complex." Most of them aren't actually deep; they're just a messy pile of clichés and childish life lessons mashed together with some subpar CG animation.
Richard Howard2 said:Honestly, you guys don't have a clue.
Oh... wow. That was just a flawless argument right there. I mean, seriously, how am I even supposed to respond to that? 😲
I'm throwing in the towel, Richard Howard2... you're just too much of an opponent for me to handle. 👋