CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Everything about An Education

Everything about An Education

Started by Melissa Evans · · 👁 5 views · 35 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Melissa EvansRonald Morales51crimsoncanyon9Michelle Flores40brightscout63Amanda Nguyen5Morgan Ortiz91rustyscout34goldenhound32northerntrucker2Paul Ross12bluerider63Larry Cruz51Ethan Vaughn22Gary PatelPeter Cooper5darkwalker2hollowsailor48Michelle Ward4Carol Nguyen63placidmarlin3gentlejackal19boldcrane6Thomas Castillo31 …
Gary Patel Gary Patel Active Member
74 messages
joined Jul 2022
#21 ·
Watched the movie last night. At first, the plot flows really nicely—but then everything starts to drag and becomes... well, I wouldn't call it boring, because it wasn't quite that—just strange. As the idyllic vibe faded, the pacing slowed down right along with it. It felt like certain scenes were just repeating themselves (like her whole explanation for why skipping college was the better move) rather than building anything—it felt like they were just being tossed in without much connection. I can't say the film was bad, per se, but the characterizations felt—hm—unrealistic. Her relationship with such an older guy, her sheer naivety, how she just gave in... If she were just some airhead, I might get it, but she was clearly smart and intelligent. No matter how much she was in love, I just don't buy that she’d let him push those boundaries throughout the film. Even her parents' reaction to the "relationship" felt off to me. I'm also bummed that we didn't get any closure on what actually happened to him at the end. I don't know—the setup and the ending were great, but there was just a massive gap in the middle. The lead actress did an amazing job. Honestly, the acting was top-notch across the board—it's just that the actual behavior being acted out felt weird to me.
7/10
Melissa Evans Melissa Evans MemberOP
23 messages
joined Sep 2009
#22 ·
Gary Patel said:Watched the movie last night. At first, the plot flows really nicely—but then everything starts to drag and becomes... well, I wouldn't call it boring, because it wasn't quite that—just strange. As the idyllic vibe faded, the pacing slowed down right along with it. It felt like certain scenes were just repeating themselves (like her whole explanation for why skipping college was the better move) rather than building anything—it felt like they were just being tossed in without much connection. I can't say the film was bad, per se, but the characterizations felt—hm—unrealistic. Her relationship with such an older guy, her sheer naivety, how she just gave in... If she were just some airhead, I might get it, but she was clearly smart and intelligent. No matter how much she was in love, I just don't buy that she’d let him push those boundaries throughout the film. Even her parents' reaction to the "relationship" felt off to me. I'm also bummed that we didn't get any closure on what actually happened to him at the end. I don't know—the setup and the ending were great, but there was just a massive gap in the middle. The lead actress did an amazing job. Honestly, the acting was top-notch across the board—it's just that the actual behavior being acted out felt weird to me.
7/10

The main thing is that you didn't find Lady Gaga strange.

As long as you don't find it strange that you chose the name Gary Patel.
Peter Cooper5 Peter Cooper5 Active Member
55 messages
joined May 2007
#23 ·
Larry Cruz51 said:I only really caught fail s with that chocolate she brought into her professor's apartment. She definitely didn't have it on her before that.

The internet says that in the scene where he heads over to the apartment, there are all these continuity errors like seeing modern cars on the street and stuff... but I totally missed all of that.

So, I went back and watched that scene again, and I mean, I really looked, but I don't see any cars that look out of place for that era. If I'm totally missing something, please, someone, set me straight.

Anyway, I actually liked the movie. I’m not really in the mood to write some massive, deep-dive essay here, but I think the whole point was just how easy it is to slip up, no matter how smart or brilliant you think you are. She was naive, I guess. You show her exactly what she wants, and she'll follow it anywhere—especially since school probably felt like a total drag after her dad spent all that time breathing down her neck to get straight A's.

All in all, it's worth a watch, though it definitely isn't for everyone.
darkwalker2 darkwalker2 Member
29 messages
joined Aug 2008
#24 ·
I honestly think the movie is fantastic! However, I’ve been struggling to track down that one song from the very beginning—it’s just so indescribably charming. It plays right at the start during that opening sequence while they're filming Jenny and her friends, back when the credits are still rolling over the screen. It has this upbeat rhythm with a piano playing such a cheerful melody, though it does have a slight old-school rock vibe to it. Does anyone happen to know what it is? 😉
hollowsailor48 hollowsailor48 Member
40 messages
joined Sep 2009
#25 ·
It’s not a bad movie, per se, but it feels like it’s missing a certain spark.🤷

@darkwalker2 Maybe try searching for that melody this way:click
darkwalker2 darkwalker2 Member
29 messages
joined Aug 2008
#26 ·
hollowsailor48 said:It’s not a bad movie, per se, but it feels like it’s missing a certain spark.🤷

@darkwalker2 Maybe try searching for that melody this way:click

Thank you so much, but it's nowhere to be found! I've already tried looking that way and came up empty-handed. It's such a shame, because it really is wonderful. Ahh... If I happen to track it down, I'll post it here. 😉
Michelle Ward4 Michelle Ward4 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2010
#27 ·
on the rebound, is it actually.. 🙂
a perfect film 🙏
darkwalker2 darkwalker2 Member
29 messages
joined Aug 2008
#28 ·
Michelle Ward4 said:on the rebound, is it actually.. 🙂
a perfect film 🙏

Daaaaaa! Good grief, bravo! Honestly, you’ve actually managed to brighten my mood just now. That song is such a burst of pure joy! Well, thank YOU!!! 😉 😍 😍
Carol Nguyen63 Carol Nguyen63 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Feb 2008
#29 ·
I wouldn't go so far as to call it a masterpiece, but I have a massive soft spot for these kinds of films; it’s a drama that really hits my sweet spot, and it isn't slow at all—there's plenty of substance and dialogue that actually feels like art.
The lead actress is absolutely phenomenal, delivering such a wide spectrum of emotion where the shifts in her expression are subtle, almost just tiny nuances in 😍
And that brilliant transition from a dutiful, model student to a self-aware young woman who knows exactly how to use her charms... you can practically see the end of innocence right there, like a sudden awakening of the senses. 😁

thanks for the song 👋
Michelle Ward4 Michelle Ward4 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2010
#30 ·
cheered me up 🙂 not really
placidmarlin3 placidmarlin3 Member
45 messages
joined Apr 2013
#31 ·
Carol Nguyen63 said:I wouldn't go so far as to call it a masterpiece, but I have a massive soft spot for these kinds of films; it’s a drama that really hits my sweet spot, and it isn't slow at all—there's plenty of substance and dialogue that actually feels like art.
The lead actress is absolutely phenomenal, delivering such a wide spectrum of emotion where the shifts in her expression are subtle, almost just tiny nuances in 😍
And that brilliant transition from a dutiful, model student to a self-aware young woman who knows exactly how to use her charms... you can practically see the end of innocence right there, like a sudden awakening of the senses. 😁

thanks for the song 👋

Without getting too philosophical, I find myself nodding along with this entire post!👍😍

Aside from Up in the Air, this was another film that absolutely deserved an Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay before Precious came along.
gentlejackal19 gentlejackal19 Newcomer
1 message
joined Mar 2010
#32 ·
Anyone who has sat through even a single episode of Mad mana should have a clear grasp of the characters' motivations and their underlying psychology. Personally, I found the film quite compelling; I suspect it was intentionally crafted to feel jarring and disorienting for our "modern generation." For me, the standout performances were from Peter Sarsgaard and Rosamund Pike—her interpretation, in particular, was absolutely masterful!

On another note, this is the film of the year—according to Tarantino(!)
boldcrane6 boldcrane6 Member
13 messages
joined Nov 2013
#33 ·
Caught a movie the other day and actually enjoyed it, even though—if I'm being honest—it definitely could have been much better.
The plot felt a little thin in places, but I still liked it as it was. I guess I'll have to agree with one of the posts above and admit that I just have a massive soft spot for these kinds of movies—you know, those heavy dramas. 🙂
The lead actress was absolutely fantastic, and I found the character of Jennyin totally charming (her accent was just perfect 🙂). 😍
Thomas Castillo31 Thomas Castillo31 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Aug 2008
#34 ·
The movie is actually quite good overall; I’ve always had a soft spot for those Lolita film types. My only real gripe is that the ending felt a bit rushed—maybe "rushed" isn't quite the right word, but... I just find it hard to believe that Peter would actually be capable of doing that. I love him 😍
There was that moment where David told Danny that she was truly the one. Since they were best friends and Danny knew everything he was up to, David could have easily lied to him without Danny ever catching on. It all would have made sense if we were talking about a wife or something serious, you know? That would pass. But the fact that she's just one girl among many? It feels totally unnecessary. Just unclear.

I love Peter😍😍
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#35 ·
Carey swiped the Oscars ☕
Andrew White58 Andrew White58 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#36 ·
Morgan Ortiz91 said:I went to see this movie without any prior info, other than a trailer I actually liked and the fact that Nick Hornby wrote the screenplay, which I figured would be a huge selling point. To be honest, I don't even know who directed it now, because after enduring two hours of pure torture, I didn't even care to find out.
Then I check Rotten Tomatoes and see a 94% rating?! Okay, look, I know you can't argue with taste—beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that—but personally, I thought the film was a bit of a disaster and nowhere near a masterpiece.
First off, the relationships between most of the characters felt incredibly cliché and superficial to me, and the plot felt about as deep as something out of Gloria:

*** SPOILER ALERT *****

It’s just girl meets boy, girl falls in love, girl finds out he's married (or some other tragic twist like a terminal illness, like _______). How does such a bright, intelligent girl end up hanging out with a bunch of crooks? And what exactly was the lesson Jennyna took away from her relationship with David—that even if he wasn't married, she'd have married him anyway and abandoned her studies? Also, why does Danny, who clearly has the same moral compass as David, suddenly start acting so high and mighty and cut ties with David just because he proposes to Jenny? His character feels so incredibly thin. What even drives him?
And the icing on the cake? David. Just awful. The actor in this role is just painfully slimy. First, they shower us with these half-romantic images that lack any hint of anything provocative or sexual... I mean, jeez, the girl is 16... I get the whole vibe of Lolita film, but most of this movie doesn't even lean into sexual undertones, so after a while, you stop expecting them... because you think it isn't that kind of movie... and then those two scenes in the hotel room, especially the one with the banana. WTF?! Then there's her last line, something along the lines of: the guy asked if I wanted to visit Paris with him, and I never told him I'd already seen Paris... Is Paris supposed to be a symbol for her virginity? Because if it isn't, and it's just meant to represent an exotic destination for a girl who hasn't seen much of the world, they could have picked somewhere even more exotic like India, instead of France, which is basically right next door. 😬
I just couldn't bring myself to get swept up in the "romance" of the film... if there even was any...

She’s a little confused. Honestly, she's just completely burnt out from grinding so hard—she’s mentioned how exhausted she is more times than I can count. Rough and dull. And so on... that whole first love thing. She ended up learning that lesson the hard way.
goldenhound32 said:
Morgan Ortiz91 Asks:
It begins with the typical, almost predictable trajectory of a modern romance. A woman meets a man—there is an immediate, unforced connection, the kind that feels both effortless and inevitable. She falls, quite deeply and without reservation, convinced she has finally stumbled upon something genuine in a world of superficiality. Then comes the inevitable, crushing pivot. The truth surfaces, and it is always devastating: he is married, or perhaps he is facing a terminal diagnosis, or some other catastrophic reality that renders the entire affair a beautiful, doomed mistake. It is the classic architecture of heartbreak, stripped of its romantic pretension and laid bare in all its cruelty.

You can strip any film down to its basic components, but I honestly don't see what you're trying to achieve here. Even if they had finished together, someone would still find a reason to complain that the movie had a conventional, predictable ending. ☕

How does a girl that sharp and brilliant end up running with a pack of thieves?

Have you ever actually been in a relationship, or do you at least know someone who has? 😁
Believe it or not, when it comes to falling in love, IQ is completely irrelevant.

Besides that, by the time she actually realized they were stealing, she had already been caught red-handed.

What lesson did Jennyna actually take away from her relationship with David?

In this life, you can only truly rely on yourself.

Why on earth is Danny—who possesses the exact same moral compass as I David—suddenly acting like a saint and cutting ties with David just because he asked Jenny out?

Where exactly does this idea come from—that Danny possesses the same moral compass as David? When it comes to women, Danny has a girlfriend and he isn't cheating on her. His issue was with David's behavior, and if you actually pay attention to their dialogue, it’s clear that Jenny isn't some isolated incident. It's evident that Danny simply doesn't want to see Jenny get hurt.

Danny: Are you actually aware of the implications here, old man? What you're doing with Jenny?
David: This is the one, Danny.
Right.
You see, she’s different.
Danny: I simply have no desire to witness her suffering.

And the icing on the cake—David. It’s just awful. That actor is beyond greasy in this role. First, we’re bombarded with a heap of these pseudo-romantic images that don't even hint at anything scandalous or sexual...

It isn't sappy; it’s just masculine. 🙂
It wasn't the musical instrument that caused him to pull the car over; it was her. He saw her and simply had to stop. Honestly, even back then, it was painfully obvious to me that he wanted her.
As for why it took him so long to actually make his move—well, that’s simply because David is a gentleman.

Her final sentence was written in that specific style: some guy asked her if she wanted to go to Paris with him, and she didn't even tell him she’d already been there... Is Paris acting as a sort of symbolic stand-in for her virginity?

Maybe she’s already been to Paris on her parents' dime.

Because if she hasn't, and it's just some exotic destination for a girl who hasn't seen anything of the world...

She knows way more about Paris; she speaks the language, she's familiar with French literature, and she views Paris as this romantic escape—yet you're suggesting she head off to gritty India? lol.

I somehow couldn't get into the "romanticism" of the film at all... if such a thing even exists...

It doesn't matter; someone will 😁

Even with everything her parents tell her, he wouldn't have been interested if she wasn't smart. Being good-looking doesn't mean much if you're dim. And honestly, I still don't get why she couldn't make a marriage work—back when she actually thought everything was going great. I Should I go back to school?

Morgan Ortiz91 said:I went to see this movie without any prior info, other than a trailer I actually liked and the fact that Nick Hornby wrote the screenplay, which I figured would be a huge selling point. To be honest, I don't even know who directed it now, because after enduring two hours of pure torture, I didn't even care to find out.
Then I check Rotten Tomatoes and see a 94% rating?! Okay, look, I know you can't argue with taste—beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that—but personally, I thought the film was a bit of a disaster and nowhere near a masterpiece.
First off, the relationships between most of the characters felt incredibly cliché and superficial to me, and the plot felt about as deep as something out of Gloria:

*** SPOILER ALERT *****

It’s just girl meets boy, girl falls in love, girl finds out he's married (or some other tragic twist like a terminal illness, like _______). How does such a bright, intelligent girl end up hanging out with a bunch of crooks? And what exactly was the lesson Jennyna took away from her relationship with David—that even if he wasn't married, she'd have married him anyway and abandoned her studies? Also, why does Danny, who clearly has the same moral compass as David, suddenly start acting so high and mighty and cut ties with David just because he proposes to Jenny? His character feels so incredibly thin. What even drives him?
And the icing on the cake? David. Just awful. The actor in this role is just painfully slimy. First, they shower us with these half-romantic images that lack any hint of anything provocative or sexual... I mean, jeez, the girl is 16... I get the whole vibe of Lolita film, but most of this movie doesn't even lean into sexual undertones, so after a while, you stop expecting them... because you think it isn't that kind of movie... and then those two scenes in the hotel room, especially the one with the banana. WTF?! Then there's her last line, something along the lines of: the guy asked if I wanted to visit Paris with him, and I never told him I'd already seen Paris... Is Paris supposed to be a symbol for her virginity? Because if it isn't, and it's just meant to represent an exotic destination for a girl who hasn't seen much of the world, they could have picked somewhere even more exotic like India, instead of France, which is basically right next door. 😬
I just couldn't bring myself to get swept up in the "romance" of the film... if there even was any...

Danny and Helen aren't superficial at all; they're actually pretty hilarious supporting characters. Danny spent the whole dance sequence admiring Jenny—everything he says to her while they're moving to "I'm coming home, baby"—and just before that, he was even chatting with David. Jenny herself caught on, too; she noticed he wasn't exactly thrilled when he heard the news about the engagement.
P.S. Rosamund Pike, Pride and prejudice.Yeah, exactly. I mean, where else would I know her from?

Morgan Ortiz91 said:I went to see this movie without any prior info, other than a trailer I actually liked and the fact that Nick Hornby wrote the screenplay, which I figured would be a huge selling point. To be honest, I don't even know who directed it now, because after enduring two hours of pure torture, I didn't even care to find out.
Then I check Rotten Tomatoes and see a 94% rating?! Okay, look, I know you can't argue with taste—beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that—but personally, I thought the film was a bit of a disaster and nowhere near a masterpiece.
First off, the relationships between most of the characters felt incredibly cliché and superficial to me, and the plot felt about as deep as something out of Gloria:

*** SPOILER ALERT *****

It’s just girl meets boy, girl falls in love, girl finds out he's married (or some other tragic twist like a terminal illness, like _______). How does such a bright, intelligent girl end up hanging out with a bunch of crooks? And what exactly was the lesson Jennyna took away from her relationship with David—that even if he wasn't married, she'd have married him anyway and abandoned her studies? Also, why does Danny, who clearly has the same moral compass as David, suddenly start acting so high and mighty and cut ties with David just because he proposes to Jenny? His character feels so incredibly thin. What even drives him?
And the icing on the cake? David. Just awful. The actor in this role is just painfully slimy. First, they shower us with these half-romantic images that lack any hint of anything provocative or sexual... I mean, jeez, the girl is 16... I get the whole vibe of Lolita film, but most of this movie doesn't even lean into sexual undertones, so after a while, you stop expecting them... because you think it isn't that kind of movie... and then those two scenes in the hotel room, especially the one with the banana. WTF?! Then there's her last line, something along the lines of: the guy asked if I wanted to visit Paris with him, and I never told him I'd already seen Paris... Is Paris supposed to be a symbol for her virginity? Because if it isn't, and it's just meant to represent an exotic destination for a girl who hasn't seen much of the world, they could have picked somewhere even more exotic like India, instead of France, which is basically right next door. 😬
I just couldn't bring myself to get swept up in the "romance" of the film... if there even was any...

He isn't slimy; he’s charming. Aside from being married, of course. But hey, that's just a tiny little detail. 😁

goldenhound32 said:
Morgan Ortiz91 Asks:
It begins with the typical, almost predictable trajectory of a modern romance. A woman meets a man—there is an immediate, unforced connection, the kind that feels both effortless and inevitable. She falls, quite deeply and without reservation, convinced she has finally stumbled upon something genuine in a world of superficiality. Then comes the inevitable, crushing pivot. The truth surfaces, and it is always devastating: he is married, or perhaps he is facing a terminal diagnosis, or some other catastrophic reality that renders the entire affair a beautiful, doomed mistake. It is the classic architecture of heartbreak, stripped of its romantic pretension and laid bare in all its cruelty.

You can strip any film down to its basic components, but I honestly don't see what you're trying to achieve here. Even if they had finished together, someone would still find a reason to complain that the movie had a conventional, predictable ending. ☕

How does a girl that sharp and brilliant end up running with a pack of thieves?

Have you ever actually been in a relationship, or do you at least know someone who has? 😁
Believe it or not, when it comes to falling in love, IQ is completely irrelevant.

Besides that, by the time she actually realized they were stealing, she had already been caught red-handed.

What lesson did Jennyna actually take away from her relationship with David?

In this life, you can only truly rely on yourself.

Why on earth is Danny—who possesses the exact same moral compass as I David—suddenly acting like a saint and cutting ties with David just because he asked Jenny out?

Where exactly does this idea come from—that Danny possesses the same moral compass as David? When it comes to women, Danny has a girlfriend and he isn't cheating on her. His issue was with David's behavior, and if you actually pay attention to their dialogue, it’s clear that Jenny isn't some isolated incident. It's evident that Danny simply doesn't want to see Jenny get hurt.

Danny: Are you actually aware of the implications here, old man? What you're doing with Jenny?
David: This is the one, Danny.
Right.
You see, she’s different.
Danny: I simply have no desire to witness her suffering.

And the icing on the cake—David. It’s just awful. That actor is beyond greasy in this role. First, we’re bombarded with a heap of these pseudo-romantic images that don't even hint at anything scandalous or sexual...

It isn't sappy; it’s just masculine. 🙂
It wasn't the musical instrument that caused him to pull the car over; it was her. He saw her and simply had to stop. Honestly, even back then, it was painfully obvious to me that he wanted her.
As for why it took him so long to actually make his move—well, that’s simply because David is a gentleman.

Her final sentence was written in that specific style: some guy asked her if she wanted to go to Paris with him, and she didn't even tell him she’d already been there... Is Paris acting as a sort of symbolic stand-in for her virginity?

Maybe she’s already been to Paris on her parents' dime.

Because if she hasn't, and it's just some exotic destination for a girl who hasn't seen anything of the world...

She knows way more about Paris; she speaks the language, she's familiar with French literature, and she views Paris as this romantic escape—yet you're suggesting she head off to gritty India? lol.

I somehow couldn't get into the "romanticism" of the film at all... if such a thing even exists...

It doesn't matter; someone will 😁

No, she was there with David.

I finally sat down and watched it myself. All things considered, I actually liked it. It’s not exactly a masterpiece, but it isn't some tedious drama either. The production design and costumes were lovely div>

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads