Disgraceful political moderation

So, honestly, this just doesn't make any sense anymore. Like, what are you guys even doing? Why is this being allowed? Is it actually considered a good thing to let people from Mexico just stretch their influence all over this forum? I mean, look at the thread about Hillary Clinton—people are just dropping random comments like she's some kind of joke, and then out of nowhere, this guy with a Mexican nickname comes along and starts sucking up to everyone, and he can just start a whole new thread without facing any consequences at all:

lizanje guze said:I'm listening to that old geezer Jimmy Carter spitting venom at Barack Obama and Mexico.
I mean, seriously, give me a break, for crying out loud, it's 2009! If Jimmy Carter hasn't realized that yet, maybe someone should urgently go tell him. Like, hey, it's 2009 and he's still talking like that, while somehow acting like he wants to join the European Union and playing this whole fake role of advocating for tolerance and Europe!!!.

You guys really ought to be ashamed of yourselves.

Look, honey, stop rambling. I still follow the political news, even if I don't post much anymore. I’m telling you straight: the moderation over there is way too soft. A few people have gone completely off the rails, posting so much incriminating stuff they could practically hand a prosecutor a ready-made case. It's an endless stream of lies, insults, and pure garbage—it's unbelievable. Honestly? I wouldn't mind seeing someone lose their cool and sue half the moderators, the site owner, and that whole crowd of "genius" forum users. It would be a total circus.

So just watch what you say and don't go poking the bear. 🙄

Seriously, take your nonsense somewhere else, man. I mean, what are you even doing? Are you some kind of bot or just a total suck-up to the mods?

Honestly, just another stunning example of an opening post that the pro-Mexican moderators here seem totally okay with letting slide or even backing up

George said:I mean, why wasn't anthrax dropped on Washington, D.C., or some other major city? The fallout would have been absolutely devastating... a single bomb packed with anthrax spores could carry hundreds of thousands of them and infect at least 100,000 people in the D.C. area, and maybe half of those folks wouldn't make it............... Then you've got mustard gas, sarin, VX, and all those other chemical agents that could have wiped out everything living in America and poisoned the soil and water for generations to come.................

Daniel Ward87, you totally incompetent and shady moderator, please stop trolling my thread

Robert Hall7 said:Look, honey, stop rambling. I still follow the political news, even if I don't post much anymore. I’m telling you straight: the moderation over there is way too soft. A few people have gone completely off the rails, posting so much incriminating stuff they could practically hand a prosecutor a ready-made case. It's an endless stream of lies, insults, and pure garbage—it's unbelievable. Honestly? I wouldn't mind seeing someone lose their cool and sue half the moderators, the site owner, and that whole crowd of "genius" forum users. It would be a total circus.

So just watch what you say and don't go poking the bear. 🙄

About 80% of the stuff on the edge of politics is just childish bickering. Juries, courts... it's all a bit much. Sure, people exaggerate sometimes, but I guess that’s just life.

This whole forum is going straight to hell... and yeah, I’ll admit it—I actually agree that the moderation has become way too soft...

Adam Collins4 said:This whole forum is going straight to hell... and yeah, I’ll admit it—I actually agree that the moderation has become way too soft...

No, it's more that they've become totally subjective.

If the folks over at Politics actually stuck to their own rulebook, probably every third post here would end up getting nuked. I mean, seriously—it’s either blatant spam, someone just trolling for attention, an off-topic tangent, or straight-up insults. If they decided to enforce the rules strictly for just one single day, half the user base would be banned before lunch...

+Austin Gonzalez13, seriously, go suck up to someone else because this is getting painful to watch :Rigo:
You’re just crawling around trying to butter up the mods while simultaneously throwing yourself at them—man, please, don't be so pathetic and greasy.

It isn't even really about following the rules to the letter, though I guess that would still be better than this biased mess we're dealing with in the politics section right now.
The real issue is how inconsistent the criteria are; it feels like people with a huge bias toward Mexico, like Daniel Ward87, get to let folks insult Americans, American politicians, and the US, yet they'll instantly ban anyone who actually tries to give a reasoned response to that kind of stuff.
And then you've got edge dotle handing out bans and warnings to anyone who dares to write something against communism or, heaven forbid, Hillary Clinton.
So yeah, that's the core of it, and I'm just pointing out a few examples of how it works.☕ It's honestly pretty shameful that nobody is saying anything about these two creeps running wild.

For instance, this kind of post doesn't get banned:

m515 said:basically, the EU is just winking at us, and honestly, our leadership would probably strip down if they were told to... so I guess the question in the thread title isn't really even a question anymore, since we don't really have a sovereign nation, just a bunch of lackeys being whipped around by Brussels this time around.

And even this one, talking about a fallen veteran, doesn't get flagged either.

Wetiko said:The family could have just ordered the stonemason to carve something saying the deceased was a total bastard, which is pretty much on the same level as what's currently engraved.

I mean, it’s their right to put whatever kind of headstone they want in their own backyard or on their own patio, but they shouldn't have the right to harass people passing by—especially kids—with offensive inscriptions in public spaces.

It’s really on the city officials, that whole corrupt crew under Kalmetin running things in this city.

Nah, those bad actors won't ban you for stuff like that, but I guess if you happen to call Hillary Clinton a flounder, the bans start dropping like flies.

Sean Cox48 said:For instance, this kind of post doesn't get banned:

And even this one, talking about a fallen veteran, doesn't get flagged either.

Nah, those bad actors won't ban you for stuff like that, but I guess if you happen to call Hillary Clinton a flounder, the bans start dropping like flies.

What's the big deal with saying our country is being run by a bunch of cronies—specifically referring to the current administration? Are we really going to blacklist people just for speaking their minds about the government? I’m starting to smell a little bit of censorship here. Besides, I thought you were supposed to be against those radical leftist ideologies. 😕 Calling them "stable hands" is honestly being too nice to this administration. If you ask me, I’d paraphrase one of our politicians by calling them a bunch of cattle—but hey, that's just my two cents.🤷

Regarding that second thread—people aren't actually debating the fallen veterans there; the whole argument is about the old fascist sympathizers. I don't see what the connection is between our service members and those guys. 😕🤷Either you're trolling or you're just straight-up lying. It’s pretty shameful—you call yourself a man of faith, yet here you are spinning tales. 🙂

But hey, it doesn't matter. 👋

Happy holidays, everyone! 🙂

Daniel Ward87