This Is It (2009)

Kimberly Mitchell42 said:Michael Jackson was in perfect health. HERE is a clip of him saying things that certain people took issue with—partly because he recorded a track aimed at them:
They don't care about us

It’s no coincidence his life went downhill—the fake accusations and the absolute wreckage of his career—right after that song came out. The media just had him in their crosshairs, pushing him until he finally cracked under all that physical and mental pressure.

The documentary is actually great, though; I found the way he treated people, his crew, and everyone else just fascinating. He was just overflowing with love, warmth, and faith in God, which is pretty rare to see these days.
It was honestly wild seeing how much energy and sheer willpower Michael Jackson still had. I can't picture any other 50-year-old having that kind of drive, especially considering how much the news cycle tried to sell everyone on the idea that he was falling apart.
And his fans, along with the rest of us, will be able to tell our grandkids one day that we were lucky enough to live through the era of such a massive legend.

Rumor has it the movie might snag a Best Picture nod
http://goldderby.latimes.com/awards_...y-article.html

I’ve already watched this movie twice and it’s honestly incredible!

MJ is in peak condition here, his dancing is flawless, his vocals are stunning, and he just comes across as so humble, sweet, and almost boyishly innocent 😍
He’s a world-class performer, but more importantly, he’s just a genuinely great human being.
I really wish he could have experienced even just one live concert. 😢

man 😍

I’m honestly disappointed. Like, really disappointed. The direction just missed the mark for me—I was expecting more emotional beats, those heart-tugging moments that actually land, but nothing really moved me. As the movie goes on, the energy just drains away. It feels like they chopped things up and glued them back together without much thought. I don't know, it just felt rushed and careless. And regarding Michael—I walked away feeling like everyone else around him was doing the heavy lifting to create the spectacle. Between the dancers, the lighting, and the musicians, they were incredible, and while his dancing is absolutely unmatched, his vocals... I wouldn't say it was always a matter of being "economical." At one point (I can't recall exactly which one), you can tell he was leaning on the crowd to carry him because his voice was cracking.

All in all, I expected way more from this.

Yeah, maybe they could've thrown in a few more clips of interviews or actual conversations and stuff. But honestly, the whole point of the film is just to give you a sense of what the vibe was supposed to be—showing his state of mind, how he moves, and how he sings at fifty, which is why they stuck mostly to rehearsal footage. 🙂

I really have to step in here because I totally disagree with the idea that Michael contributed the least or had the smallest part in making that spectacle happen. Look, the dancers, the band, and the backup singers are all incredible, I'll give them that. But Michael is just on another level entirely. Sure, he's got some age on him and he's twice as old as the rest of the crew, that's a fact. But for a fifty-year-old... 😲 he is in absolute PEAK condition! You would never guess his age. Watching him move with that kind of effortless grace, I was basically sitting there looking like this: 😲😲🙏

In my book, his voice stayed flawless too. 😍 If someone feels differently, that's fine, but it felt to me like the production focused way more on the choreography, the special effects, and the cinematic transitions before the songs rather than just raw vocals. Whether he was belting it out or just pacing himself, he sounds perfect! 😍

gentleseal23 said:Yeah, maybe they could've thrown in a few more clips of interviews or actual conversations and stuff. But honestly, the whole point of the film is just to give you a sense of what the vibe was supposed to be—showing his state of mind, how he moves, and how he sings at fifty, which is why they stuck mostly to rehearsal footage. 🙂

I really have to step in here because I totally disagree with the idea that Michael contributed the least or had the smallest part in making that spectacle happen. Look, the dancers, the band, and the backup singers are all incredible, I'll give them that. But Michael is just on another level entirely. Sure, he's got some age on him and he's twice as old as the rest of the crew, that's a fact. But for a fifty-year-old... 😲 he is in absolute PEAK condition! You would never guess his age. Watching him move with that kind of effortless grace, I was basically sitting there looking like this: 😲😲🙏

In my book, his voice stayed flawless too. 😍 If someone feels differently, that's fine, but it felt to me like the production focused way more on the choreography, the special effects, and the cinematic transitions before the songs rather than just raw vocals. Whether he was belting it out or just pacing himself, he sounds perfect! 😍

Whose, though? It's not like those people knew he was actually going to die, so why would they be out there interviewing him every single day?

driftingeagle27 said:Whose, though? It's not like those people knew he was actually going to die, so why would they be out there interviewing him every single day?

Look, 🙂it’s all scripted. They knew everything! 😉Mikey didn't actually die, and he certainly wasn't murdered!
In reality, they just killed off his symbol—his name. The man was simply scrubbed from the stage, and that's that. This Is It!

If you take the time—and I mean really sit down and study those clips—once the initial hype dies down and you watch certain segments of that film, you'll see a mountain of inconsistencies and obvious editing.
Just one tiny detail: there's a shot where he (or maybe a lookalike?) is sitting at the mixing console with straight, thick hair, but then later on stage, he (or another lookalike?) shows up with long, curly hair!

I’d strongly suggest actual fans check out some of the great documentaries on this topic and just think about it. There are several theories floating around, but the most plausible one is that the whole thing was orchestrated by his family. There is no way—not any sane or healthy person—could pull off 50 (FIFTY!) consecutive concerts. Even if he was just dancing. (The idea that he used playback is nonsense. He was a world-class musician; he wouldn't subject himself to that kind of embarrassment. Using body doubles for privacy is a different story entirely).
Doing 50 shows is pure madness. That’s why they set up this whole strategy of filming rehearsals—using top-tier audio and video tech—specifically for a movie. A movie that has already raked in millions of dollars. And let's be honest, it isn't even a real documentary. It's absurd, right? And the money will just keep rolling in through merch, DVDs, memorabilia, rights, old CDs, and so on... Plus, he left behind hundreds of finished tracks ready for production and release. Etc...

Basically, he gets to live in peace, far away from the public eye and all the vultures that spent his entire life picking him clean.

Another theory from the conspiracy crowd is that he was removed—not necessarily killed, necessarily—by people he crossed. Was it Sony, the label he had so many issues with? They are one of the most powerful forces in the global entertainment industry. So... just think about it! 😛

Either way, go watch:

Michael Jackson's Death: Media Hoax Part 1
There are 14 parts in total—definitely worth a watch!!! Jonell star TV
This Is It!
Though even there, we won't find out who the guy calling 911 actually was. Think about it! 😉

It's just too much. You can literally find footage online of a guy calling 911. It’s wild stuff.
Even in the movie, he pulled off at least eight different things either fully or partially on Playback.
People really just need to open their eyes, clear their heads, and actually use their brains.

driftingeagle27 said:Whose, though? It's not like those people knew he was actually going to die, so why would they be out there interviewing him every single day?

Whose, exactly? Well, obviously his own and his entire crew's (the singer, the dancers, all that).
It doesn't matter if they knew he was dying before the first show or not; you really think they wouldn't have been "interviewed"?

By the way, I wasn't talking about a formal interview, I meant more like behind-the-scenes stuff, just random things said that don't necessarily have to tie back to the songs 😛 and there was definitely plenty of that happening. 🙂

crimsonstag59 said:Look, 🙂it’s all scripted. They knew everything! 😉Mikey didn't actually die, and he certainly wasn't murdered!
In reality, they just killed off his symbol—his name. The man was simply scrubbed from the stage, and that's that. This Is It!

If you take the time—and I mean really sit down and study those clips—once the initial hype dies down and you watch certain segments of that film, you'll see a mountain of inconsistencies and obvious editing.
Just one tiny detail: there's a shot where he (or maybe a lookalike?) is sitting at the mixing console with straight, thick hair, but then later on stage, he (or another lookalike?) shows up with long, curly hair!

I’d strongly suggest actual fans check out some of the great documentaries on this topic and just think about it. There are several theories floating around, but the most plausible one is that the whole thing was orchestrated by his family. There is no way—not any sane or healthy person—could pull off 50 (FIFTY!) consecutive concerts. Even if he was just dancing. (The idea that he used playback is nonsense. He was a world-class musician; he wouldn't subject himself to that kind of embarrassment. Using body doubles for privacy is a different story entirely).
Doing 50 shows is pure madness. That’s why they set up this whole strategy of filming rehearsals—using top-tier audio and video tech—specifically for a movie. A movie that has already raked in millions of dollars. And let's be honest, it isn't even a real documentary. It's absurd, right? And the money will just keep rolling in through merch, DVDs, memorabilia, rights, old CDs, and so on... Plus, he left behind hundreds of finished tracks ready for production and release. Etc...

Basically, he gets to live in peace, far away from the public eye and all the vultures that spent his entire life picking him clean.

Another theory from the conspiracy crowd is that he was removed—not necessarily killed, necessarily—by people he crossed. Was it Sony, the label he had so many issues with? They are one of the most powerful forces in the global entertainment industry. So... just think about it! 😛

Either way, go watch:

Michael Jackson's Death: Media Hoax Part 1
There are 14 parts in total—definitely worth a watch!!! Jonell star TV
This Is It!
Though even there, we won't find out who the guy calling 911 actually was. Think about it! 😉

You seriously never change your hair?

crimsonstag59 said:Look, 🙂it’s all scripted. They knew everything! 😉Mikey didn't actually die, and he certainly wasn't murdered!
In reality, they just killed off his symbol—his name. The man was simply scrubbed from the stage, and that's that. This Is It!

If you take the time—and I mean really sit down and study those clips—once the initial hype dies down and you watch certain segments of that film, you'll see a mountain of inconsistencies and obvious editing.
Just one tiny detail: there's a shot where he (or maybe a lookalike?) is sitting at the mixing console with straight, thick hair, but then later on stage, he (or another lookalike?) shows up with long, curly hair!

I’d strongly suggest actual fans check out some of the great documentaries on this topic and just think about it. There are several theories floating around, but the most plausible one is that the whole thing was orchestrated by his family. There is no way—not any sane or healthy person—could pull off 50 (FIFTY!) consecutive concerts. Even if he was just dancing. (The idea that he used playback is nonsense. He was a world-class musician; he wouldn't subject himself to that kind of embarrassment. Using body doubles for privacy is a different story entirely).
Doing 50 shows is pure madness. That’s why they set up this whole strategy of filming rehearsals—using top-tier audio and video tech—specifically for a movie. A movie that has already raked in millions of dollars. And let's be honest, it isn't even a real documentary. It's absurd, right? And the money will just keep rolling in through merch, DVDs, memorabilia, rights, old CDs, and so on... Plus, he left behind hundreds of finished tracks ready for production and release. Etc...

Basically, he gets to live in peace, far away from the public eye and all the vultures that spent his entire life picking him clean.

Another theory from the conspiracy crowd is that he was removed—not necessarily killed, necessarily—by people he crossed. Was it Sony, the label he had so many issues with? They are one of the most powerful forces in the global entertainment industry. So... just think about it! 😛

Either way, go watch:

Michael Jackson's Death: Media Hoax Part 1
There are 14 parts in total—definitely worth a watch!!! Jonell star TV
This Is It!
Though even there, we won't find out who the guy calling 911 actually was. Think about it! 😉

It wasn't even announced they’d be back-to-back, just that there would be breaks in between.

@crimsonstag59 : solid post 🙂 really gives you something to chew on.
Anyway, I’ve scrolled through like 75,000 videos debating whether he actually passed away or not, seeing all sorts of evidence claiming he's still out there, and honestly, the whole thing is just fascinating and makes you think. To be real, if anyone was ever going to fake their own death, it would be MJ. I’m not saying he was crazy or anything weird, but the pressure he was under from every single direction was insane, especially with the media absolutely wrecking his life with their nonsense, twisting his image until everyone turned on him and created all those haters.

ruggedmarlin15 said:It's just too much. You can literally find footage online of a guy calling 911. It’s wild stuff.
Even in the movie, he pulled off at least eight different things either fully or partially on Playback.
People really just need to open their eyes, clear their heads, and actually use their brains.

Why does everyone assume he can't sing like he used to?
(Not just talking about you, 😉) Why does everything have to be Playback if it sounds just as incredible as the studio album? -.-
Maybe he used Playback for two things, but there's no way it was for eight.

gentleseal23 said:Whose, exactly? Well, obviously his own and his entire crew's (the singer, the dancers, all that).
It doesn't matter if they knew he was dying before the first show or not; you really think they wouldn't have been "interviewed"?

By the way, I wasn't talking about a formal interview, I meant more like behind-the-scenes stuff, just random things said that don't necessarily have to tie back to the songs 😛 and there was definitely plenty of that happening. 🙂

I honestly feel like the singers, dancers, and everyone else shared enough in the documentary. That part at the very beginning was actually pretty moving.

I don't get why you'd expect a ton of footage showing accidents or mishaps backstage; it’s pretty obvious that when you're prepping for a massive concert, the cameras are mostly focused on stage rehearsals so they can review and analyze the performance later.

What I'm saying is that there would've been way more recorded conversations behind the scenes if they actually knew the guy was dying; as it stands, I don't see much reason why they would have gone out of their way to do that.

The movie is just what they had available to work with, plain and simple, and honestly, I thought it was surprisingly good.

driftingeagle27 said:I honestly feel like the singers, dancers, and everyone else shared enough in the documentary. That part at the very beginning was actually pretty moving.

I don't get why you'd expect a ton of footage showing accidents or mishaps backstage; it’s pretty obvious that when you're prepping for a massive concert, the cameras are mostly focused on stage rehearsals so they can review and analyze the performance later.

What I'm saying is that there would've been way more recorded conversations behind the scenes if they actually knew the guy was dying; as it stands, I don't see much reason why they would have gone out of their way to do that.

The movie is just what they had available to work with, plain and simple, and honestly, I thought it was surprisingly good.

Yeah, you've got a point there, because that opening sequence was killer. 😉
I felt like it would've been cool if they included just one (un)lucky moment behind the scenes—not like a hundred different clips 😉 but still—though I guess the rehearsals are more important since they give us a real look at how the concert was supposed to go down.

I'm sure they filmed some conversations, especially since there's about a hundred hours of footage out there, but maybe those specific tapes were just for his private collection and were handed over to his family.

I'm not saying the movie wasn't great, because it was absolutely FANTASTIC 😍
and I wouldn't change a single thing about it, really. I'm just saying it would have been nice to see a little bit of that "behind the scenes" stuff to get a glimpse of that side of things. 😛😉

gentleseal23 said:Yeah, you've got a point there, because that opening sequence was killer. 😉
I felt like it would've been cool if they included just one (un)lucky moment behind the scenes—not like a hundred different clips 😉 but still—though I guess the rehearsals are more important since they give us a real look at how the concert was supposed to go down.

I'm sure they filmed some conversations, especially since there's about a hundred hours of footage out there, but maybe those specific tapes were just for his private collection and were handed over to his family.

I'm not saying the movie wasn't great, because it was absolutely FANTASTIC 😍
and I wouldn't change a single thing about it, really. I'm just saying it would have been nice to see a little bit of that "behind the scenes" stuff to get a glimpse of that side of things. 😛😉

Yeah, there's a little bit of 🙂 truth to that.

gentleseal23 said:@crimsonstag59 : solid post 🙂 really gives you something to chew on.
Anyway, I’ve scrolled through like 75,000 videos debating whether he actually passed away or not, seeing all sorts of evidence claiming he's still out there, and honestly, the whole thing is just fascinating and makes you think. To be real, if anyone was ever going to fake their own death, it would be MJ. I’m not saying he was crazy or anything weird, but the pressure he was under from every single direction was insane, especially with the media absolutely wrecking his life with their nonsense, twisting his image until everyone turned on him and created all those haters.

Why does everyone assume he can't sing like he used to?
(Not just talking about you, 😉) Why does everything have to be Playback if it sounds just as incredible as the studio album? -.-
Maybe he used Playback for two things, but there's no way it was for eight.

That series is easily the best one yet, even if there are plenty of xxxx out there. 😁 If you actually sit down and dig into that film—and I don't just mean looking at the visuals, but doing a deep dive into the actual subtext—you can come up with some pretty mind-blowing conclusions. Honestly, the part of this whole saga that sticks with me most is the tragedy of those kids who took their own lives after hearing the news about their idol's passing. It’s heavy stuff. To get a real sense of the madness, you have to look at the contrast: you've got this tidal wave of hysteria and endless tears from the fans, pitted against the complete, chilling indifference of the families at the memorial service, where you wouldn't see a single tear. Of course, there was plenty of overacting and theatrical nonsense thrown in there too, just like you'd expect.

It’s the truth. The sheer amount of pressure he was under—between all those lawsuits and the public disgrace when they were trying to tear him down (Sony?)—most people would have snapped or just given up entirely. Very few could handle that kind of heat without losing their minds.
People who don't actually listen to his music—those who just judge everything based on surface-level aesthetics—aren't going to get it. Until they stop looking at the packaging and actually acknowledge the sheer quality of his songwriting and live performances, they’re just missing the point.
Sure, he was an eccentric. But that’s exactly why he worked. Honestly, it’s not even all that surprising when you look at people with that kind of talent. History is full of them, and we still see them popping up today. Take someone like Pogorelić—most Americans would probably just write him off as some crazy weirdo, yet he’s one of the most powerful musicians on the planet. At the end of the day, how a person looks or how they live their life is one thing, but what they actually create and pour into a performance? That's what really counts.
Michael undeniably dropped some absolute masterpieces. Even now, I run into people who couldn't stand him back in the day, yet here they are, buying his albums. They can't help but realize the sheer quality we're talking about—the vocals, the production, the songwriting, the lyrics... it's all top-tier stuff.

Why does everyone act like he suddenly lost his touch? People love to claim he can't hit those notes like he used to, as if vocal cords are some kind of finite battery that just runs out. It’s the same old story—people see a little bit of aging and immediately decide the magic is gone. They forget how much work goes into maintaining that level of performance. It’s like watching an elite athlete in their late thirties and complaining they aren't sprinting quite as fast as they were at twenty. Give me a break.
Why does everything have to be playback anyway? If they can make it sound just as good as the studio album, what's the big deal? -.-
Maybe he used a playback track for two songs, sure, but there's no way he was faking eight.

Whatever. 😉 People trying to draw parallels between Madonna and him don't really have much of a leg to stand on. Honestly, they’d be better off just putting a studio track next to a live recording and actually listening for those infamous instances of lip-syncing. 🙄

Honestly, they should just go watch Tina Turner back in the 70s, tearing up the stage during her Alive set at the arena in Arnheim. If they haven't had the chance to actually witness that kind of energy with their own eyes and ears in person, they're seriously missing out.
It all comes down to the fact that Black performers just have a different level of grit when it comes to live execution—and that goes way beyond just the music. Take James Brown, for example; he wasn't out there relying on backing tracks right before he passed. Even Chuck Berry wasn't doing the playback thing back in the late 70s. It’s just a different caliber of performance. ☕

Why do people think someone can't sing the way they used to?

You're just making things up now, much like the media outlets you rely on. It’s not a good look.
I have to say, I’m a little surprised by the selection. Playback It’s pretty obvious he had the voice for it, even just listening to those rehearsal recordings. There’s really no other way to look at it.
You don't even have to go far; just a quick Google search or a look on YouTube will give you everything you need. MJ used to sing live during a lot of his previous tours, too. Playback.
So, what we saw in the film wasn't some kind of freak occurrence. As for his actual motivations, I can only speculate.
And one more thing... How is it possible that MJ never released a single one? live Are we talking about an album? Do you want me to guess, or should I just draw it out for you? 😉

Why does everything have to be playback when it already sounds just as good as the studio album? -.-

Fair point. Even if they sound similar, they aren't exactly the same thing as what you hear on the album.

Maybe he used a playback track for one or two things, but there's no way he was using it for eight.

To start things off, here are three: TDCAU, Smooth Criminal (minus that iconic "You've been hit by, you've been struck by—a smooth criminal" line), and Thriller. We can keep going from there...

ruggedmarlin15 said:

Why do people think someone can't sing the way they used to?

You're just making things up now, much like the media outlets you rely on. It’s not a good look.
I have to say, I’m a little surprised by the selection. Playback It’s pretty obvious he had the voice for it, even just listening to those rehearsal recordings. There’s really no other way to look at it.
You don't even have to go far; just a quick Google search or a look on YouTube will give you everything you need. MJ used to sing live during a lot of his previous tours, too. Playback.
So, what we saw in the film wasn't some kind of freak occurrence. As for his actual motivations, I can only speculate.
And one more thing... How is it possible that MJ never released a single one? live Are we talking about an album? Do you want me to guess, or should I just draw it out for you? 😉

Why does everything have to be playback when it already sounds just as good as the studio album? -.-

Fair point. Even if they sound similar, they aren't exactly the same thing as what you hear on the album.

Maybe he used a playback track for one or two things, but there's no way he was using it for eight.

To start things off, here are three: TDCAU, Smooth Criminal (minus that iconic "You've been hit by, you've been struck by—a smooth criminal" line), and Thriller. We can keep going from there...

🙄 Look, maybe you should try using a search engine or checking YouTube yourself instead of lecturing everyone else on how they don't know how to use a search bar. 🙄 Jeez.

But hey, let me help you out here— Live in Bucharest : The Dangerous tour was released while he was still around! 😁 You've got both audio and video there, so go ahead and compare it to the studio tracks if that's such a huge deal to you. 🙄

Oh, and now there's also LIVE in Japan, so there's that. None of this actually has anything to do with rehearsal footage, soundchecks, practicing choreography, lighting setups, or music videos for singles.

Good grief. ☕

Larry Cruz51 said:The film is absolutely fantastic for the fans, mainly because it features so much music throughout the runtime.👍

It is truly remarkable how Michael Jackson still possesses those incredible moves and how perfectly everyone knows their parts... simply flawless!

Those who watched it without being true devotees mentioned finding it a bit dull, as they were expecting more behind-the-scenes action—more chatting with the dancers, the singers, and so on...

It honestly feels like you were right there at a Michael Jackson Dangerous Tour Rehearsal, which was wonderful for me (especially since I was actually one of those people who bought tickets for the concert that ended up being canceled):-)

An absolute Epic fail at the premiere: this one guy imitating Michael Jackson was just terrible.😂
The founder of an American fan club gave such a pathetic, overly sentimental speech that the entire audience couldn't help but laugh. It felt as if Michael Jackson were lying in a casket right in front of her while she spoke... and then, to top it all off, she sent him a message in English saying, 'If you are there...'🤣

I’ve never been much of a fan of his, to be honest. I ended up seeing that movie entirely by accident because my friends dragged me along, and frankly, I actually regretted agreeing to go.

And once the footage had played out just a bit further, it finally hit me like a ton of bricks: Michael Jackson had died!

I honestly don't even know how to begin describing that complete reversal. Contrary to what anyone would expect, MJ remains absolutely captivating even in his later years, specifically because of the sheer speed and explosive energy he brings to the stage. He has assembled a crew of dancers who don't just work for him—they worship him. These performers grew up looking up to him as their ultimate inspiration, and now they’re finally living out their lifelong dreams by sharing the stage with him.

And then we arrive at absolute perfection. We’re talking about a masterclass in vocal ability, movement, and pure musicality. MJ possessed these lightning-fast dance moves—that signature rhythm of move-pause-move-pause—where every single pause was punctuated perfectly by a drum hit or a sharp beat in the music. He moved with this otherworldly grace, almost like he was floating, or like he was walking forward while some invisible force was pulling him in the opposite direction. Honestly, looking at how thin he was, he was practically skin and bones; it makes you wonder where on earth he pulled all that energy from.

There is absolutely no playback happening here. What we are witnessing is pure, top-tier professionalism. He assembled an incredible group of musicians and meticulously crafted a spectacular production. Every song is accompanied by custom-made video visuals designed to complement the music—which some people might mistake for playback, but that’s a complete misunderstanding of the craft. These visuals are carefully synced to mirror the energy of the original music videos. Of course, MJ surrounds himself with the best in the business—vocal specialists, world-class musicians, and elite choreographers—but at the core of it all is his singular vision. He dictates exactly how a song needs to sound, how every note should be played, precisely how a track concludes, and exactly how the choreography should unfold. It is his blueprint from start to finish.

He passed away just a few days before that first concert was set to kick off. The stage was absolutely flawless—we’re talking high-end video backdrops perfectly synced to the performance, a tight group of dancers, a world-class band... everything was primed and ready. After months of grueling rehearsals, the music and choreography were in total lockstep, all wrapped up in a style that was unmistakably his and unlike anything else out there.

And now, he's gone. Just like that.

There are people left standing in the wake of months of grueling, relentless work—all those intense preparations they went through alongside MJ. They were the ones feeling that crushing tension in their chests right before he stepped out for the first performance, and by the end, they absolutely adored him. Now, he’s gone, and all of that shared history, all that effort and emotion, feels like it has vanished into thin air. There is nothing left.

Just imagine the kind of people who are standing there right now, completely ready to put on a massive show, only to find out there’s absolutely nothing left to perform. It’s honestly pathetic.

I’ve never really considered myself an MJ fan, but honestly? This is something you absolutely have to see.

crimsonstag59 said:🙄 Look, maybe you should try using a search engine or checking YouTube yourself instead of lecturing everyone else on how they don't know how to use a search bar. 🙄 Jeez.

But hey, let me help you out here— Live in Bucharest : The Dangerous tour was released while he was still around! 😁 You've got both audio and video there, so go ahead and compare it to the studio tracks if that's such a huge deal to you. 🙄

Oh, and now there's also LIVE in Japan, so there's that. None of this actually has anything to do with rehearsal footage, soundchecks, practicing choreography, lighting setups, or music videos for singles.

Good grief. ☕

You can keep arguing until the day after tomorrow, but my point remains.
The bottom line is, Michael Jackson never released an official live album.
And just think about why Live in Bucharest wasn't released on CD. ☕
We'll probably see a flood of stuff coming out soon that Michael Jackson would never have authorized in his lifetime. And there's a reason for that.
You can also read about it here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...8103113AAlJEyQ
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Michael_Jackson_lip_sync
http://www.elvis-collectors.com/foru...hp?f=2&t=46672

Well, One Night in Japan was released, so much for that argument.

That's an unofficial release. Something I could have put out myself. So there.

Here is everything he actually released; go ahead and find one live album that isn't a bootleg:
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Michael+Jackson
I mean legitimate releases from Sony, Epic Records, or any other major label.

Which actually has nothing to do with recordings of rehearsals, tuning up, practicing moves, choreography, lighting, etc., or even less to do with music videos for singles and such.

Whoops, I'm getting the impression you don't really know the subject matter, but I'm sorry if I bruised your fandom. It's just a shame it's clouding your vision. And your hearing.

I didn't come here to ruin anyone's mood, but I'm happy to answer when people jump in without thinking things through. Like I said, I don't know why he used playback because he didn't need to. He had an amazing voice. I suggest we stop off-topic chatting and keep things focused on the review. Personally, I thought the film was okay, but nothing spectacular. It's basically a montage of several rehearsals edited together. Maybe they should have included more commentary or interviews from the people involved in the project, but what can you do...

And don't get too discouraged; here are some stories about Michael Jackson from people who actually worked with him:
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-mu...ous-album.html
Everyone seems to be singing Michael Jackson's praises lately. There are actually some pretty great stories about him floating around out there. So, I figured I'd share. Enjoy. 🙂

ruggedmarlin15 said:You can keep arguing until the day after tomorrow, but my point remains.
The bottom line is, Michael Jackson never released an official live album.
And just think about why Live in Bucharest wasn't released on CD. ☕
We'll probably see a flood of stuff coming out soon that Michael Jackson would never have authorized in his lifetime. And there's a reason for that.
You can also read about it here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...8103113AAlJEyQ
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Michael_Jackson_lip_sync
http://www.elvis-collectors.com/foru...hp?f=2&t=46672

Well, One Night in Japan was released, so much for that argument.

That's an unofficial release. Something I could have put out myself. So there.

Here is everything he actually released; go ahead and find one live album that isn't a bootleg:
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Michael+Jackson
I mean legitimate releases from Sony, Epic Records, or any other major label.

Which actually has nothing to do with recordings of rehearsals, tuning up, practicing moves, choreography, lighting, etc., or even less to do with music videos for singles and such.

Whoops, I'm getting the impression you don't really know the subject matter, but I'm sorry if I bruised your fandom. It's just a shame it's clouding your vision. And your hearing.

I didn't come here to ruin anyone's mood, but I'm happy to answer when people jump in without thinking things through. Like I said, I don't know why he used playback because he didn't need to. He had an amazing voice. I suggest we stop off-topic chatting and keep things focused on the review. Personally, I thought the film was okay, but nothing spectacular. It's basically a montage of several rehearsals edited together. Maybe they should have included more commentary or interviews from the people involved in the project, but what can you do...

And don't get too discouraged; here are some stories about Michael Jackson from people who actually worked with him:
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-mu...ous-album.html
Everyone seems to be singing Michael Jackson's praises lately. There are actually some pretty great stories about him floating around out there. So, I figured I'd share. Enjoy. 🙂

🙄 Honestly, I think you’re just a troll who latched onto a topic that isn't even remotely interesting. Nobody's taking you seriously here. Personally, I don't get much out of trolls posting dead-end threads; I'd much rather see stuff that actually sparks some imagination. As for this nonsense about live playback—all it does is give people an itch they can't scratch. 🤣

I’m not exactly a die-hard Michael Jackson fan myself, but I have a soft spot for good music in general. You can go ahead and compare her to whoever you want if that's your thing—she’s clearly your idol, right? But honestly, she’s hardly a benchmark for any real comparison. Unless, of course, you think she’s worth mentioning just because she was the first one to jump at the chance to perform a tribute concert for Michael Jackson, acting all high-strung while she hums along and poses around the stage. 🤣 ☕

You clearly have an issue with live recordings. It’s obvious. You seem genuinely bothered that "Live in Bucharest" isn't on a CD, but instead lives on a DVD where you actually get video to go along with the audio. That's a massive problem for you, apparently. Honestly, I don't think you even know what you're trying to say. You get high-quality sound and visuals so you can actually study the performance—you can tell exactly when it's a playback versus when it's a raw, live moment—and somehow that's the issue? If that's your grievance, you're looking at the wrong problem entirely.
Just for your information—and look, I know you’re just trolling, but whatever—major stars, the kind of legends like Michael Jackson, don't usually bother dropping live albums as a premier musical experience. Go ahead, take a guess as to why. It’s almost always because they only bundle that stuff together with a video recording.
Here’s a solid comparison for you—"Tina Turner Live in Europe." It was recorded right when she was at the absolute peak of her career, but get this: it was filmed in a tiny club in New York City, at Madison Square Garden (I actually know the venue personally and caught another show there once!).
Michael Jackson never actually performed a concert like that in front of just a thousand people—and honestly? It’s a damn shame. A total waste. But look, he was still playing in a different league entirely, even if the people running his show weren't exactly on his wavelength.
Most of Tina Turner's other live shows were just standard DVD releases—you know, stuff like Live in Rio or her New York City sets.

I’m curious—how many concerts have you actually been to in your life? Which ones? These condescending takes remind me way too much of that one guy who’s never stepped foot in a venue, doesn't travel for shows, hasn't even seen a local band play in a dive bar, yet somehow acts like an expert on everything. 🙄 So, there was this one time, right after I got back from seeing Tina Turner live in Vienna—which was, uh, what was it... 1989?—and he later went on about it: "What can that old lady even sing anymore?" 🙄 😂 Clearly, he stayed stuck in his own little bubble, totally convinced he was right. Meanwhile, Tina Turner went out and absolutely crushed it across all of Europe again this year. Even twenty years later, she’s still untouchable.

Look, I never actually went to a Michael Jackson concert. I was never such a die-hard fanatic that I’d hop on a plane to another country just for that. Now? I’m feeling a little bit of regret.

But anyway, getting back to this "problem" you're stressing over—you're clearly just trolling about some playback issue that doesn't even make sense.
I’ve been listening to "One Night in Japan," and sure, hearing live classics is nice, but let’s be real: it’s nowhere near the peak musical experience you get from the studio albums.
Want to guess why? ☕

uh oh ...
Michael Jackson - Live in Bucharest : The Dangerous tour DVD Studio Sony Music
Orig Year 1992
DVD Encoding Region 1

That's all the "expert analysis" you're getting from a troll!