CheckEmoji Community ยท the emoji forum
๐Ÿ  Home ๐Ÿ†• What's new โ“ Unanswered ๐Ÿ”ฅ Popular ๐Ÿ“ก RSS Members ๐Ÿ‘ฅ 0 online log in ยท register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › The Ugly Truth (2009)

The Ugly Truth (2009)

Started by Melissa Evans · · ๐Ÿ‘ 6 views · 31 replies

๐Ÿ“ก Subscribe to replies

Participants Melissa Evanscrimsontrucker4Peter Cooper5Richard Gray4Roger Bishop22Emily Nelson5placidmarlin3velvetharbor3velvetdrifter42Gregory Rodriguez10Larry Cruz51Jack Campbell59Angela Alvarez10granitehound19Ronald Jackson6darkmakerRyan Alvarez2Peter Cruz7dustygardener4goldenhound32rapidviper54Hannah Robertsneonviper21
Ryan Alvarez2 Ryan Alvarez2 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Nov 2009
#21 ·
The movieโ€™s actually a pretty solid comedy with a killer cast. I mean, it doesn't exactly reveal anything we haven't heard before, right? But seeing how everything plays out is honestly super fun and hilarious.

That scene with the vibrator in the restaurantโ€”priceless. ๐Ÿ˜‚

velvetdrifter42 said:This movie needs to be banned because it is just an indescribable amount of pure stupidity! Fuck you, seriously, I almost had a nervous breakdown watching this garbage. I honestly cannot wrap my head around how anyone could agree to film this, produce this, or actually act in this piece of shit!๐Ÿ™„
Itโ€™s no wonder people today have absolutely no clue what connection or love even means!๐Ÿ™„

Like they say in the movie, The Ugly Truth hurts, doesn't it? ๐Ÿ˜‚ (So, come on, tell us what specifically got to you and what parts you related to... ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐Ÿ˜)

Richard Gray4 said:The plot was totally predictable. If it were just some cheap B-movie, I wouldn't care, but even so, itโ€™s a decent enough watch if you just want to zone out for a bit. Honestly though, why doesn't anyone make movies with actual twists anymore? It feels like all the good inspiration has been sucked dry or something. What happened to creativity?

I think you might have missed the genre here. Maybe just stop watching comedies and find yourself a thriller or some drama instead.
Peter Cruz7 Peter Cruz7 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2009
#22 ·
I honestly wasn't expecting much, so I figured Iโ€™d just pop into the theater to unwind and chill outโ€”but man, was I wrong! It had the exact opposite effect on me. I actually walked out of the cinema feeling super stressed and totally on edge. I ended up rushing straight home just so I could head over to IMDb and give it a well-deserved one-star rating.
Good for you guys if you actually managed to find some kind of life lesson in that movie...
Ryan Alvarez2 Ryan Alvarez2 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Nov 2009
#23 ·
Peter Cruz7 said:I honestly wasn't expecting much, so I figured Iโ€™d just pop into the theater to unwind and chill outโ€”but man, was I wrong! It had the exact opposite effect on me. I actually walked out of the cinema feeling super stressed and totally on edge. I ended up rushing straight home just so I could head over to IMDb and give it a well-deserved one-star rating.
Good for you guys if you actually managed to find some kind of life lesson in that movie...

I mean, itโ€™s totally normal for a movie like this to hit different depending on whether you're a guy or a girl, right? I guess it just makes sense!

The movie doesn't really have a moral or anything, but I guess youโ€™re kind of supposed to just get that from the start, right? ๐Ÿ˜

I mean, I can totally see you acting just like Heigl did in that movie. ๐Ÿ˜)

ps. Thanks for the reminder that he totally deserves a 10 on IMDb. ๐Ÿ˜‰ Thanks! ๐Ÿ˜
Gregory Rodriguez10 Gregory Rodriguez10 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2010
#24 ·
It feels to me like Katherine Heigl just plays the exact same character over and over again: ๐Ÿ˜‚ an ambitious, conservative, uptight woman in her late twenties who spends the first half of the movie refusing to admit she actually wants a man in her lifeโ€”some "emancipated" or "self-actualized" nonsenseโ€”only to end up in the arms of some ranch hand at the end who wouldn't even be on her radar at the start. And then, suddenly, sheโ€™s happy, satisfied, and realizes she was being foolish the whole time.๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„ ๐Ÿ™„
I honestly don't get how an actress can keep taking these kinds of roles and actually build a career out of it. Maybe it's just about the paycheck.โ˜•

Correct me if I'm wrong, but please name a single film where her character isn't just this magical blend of those same old tropes. ๐Ÿ˜
dustygardener4 dustygardener4 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2009
#25 ·
Gregory Rodriguez10 said:It feels to me like Katherine Heigl just plays the exact same character over and over again: ๐Ÿ˜‚ an ambitious, conservative, uptight woman in her late twenties who spends the first half of the movie refusing to admit she actually wants a man in her lifeโ€”some "emancipated" or "self-actualized" nonsenseโ€”only to end up in the arms of some ranch hand at the end who wouldn't even be on her radar at the start. And then, suddenly, sheโ€™s happy, satisfied, and realizes she was being foolish the whole time.๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„ ๐Ÿ™„
I honestly don't get how an actress can keep taking these kinds of roles and actually build a career out of it. Maybe it's just about the paycheck.โ˜•

Correct me if I'm wrong, but please name a single film where her character isn't just this magical blend of those same old tropes. ๐Ÿ˜

๐Ÿ‘
๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#26 ·
Gregory Rodriguez10 said:It feels to me like Katherine Heigl just plays the exact same character over and over again: ๐Ÿ˜‚ an ambitious, conservative, uptight woman in her late twenties who spends the first half of the movie refusing to admit she actually wants a man in her lifeโ€”some "emancipated" or "self-actualized" nonsenseโ€”only to end up in the arms of some ranch hand at the end who wouldn't even be on her radar at the start. And then, suddenly, sheโ€™s happy, satisfied, and realizes she was being foolish the whole time.๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„ ๐Ÿ™„
I honestly don't get how an actress can keep taking these kinds of roles and actually build a career out of it. Maybe it's just about the paycheck.โ˜•

Correct me if I'm wrong, but please name a single film where her character isn't just this magical blend of those same old tropes. ๐Ÿ˜

Decendants, Bride of Chucky, The Ringer, Zzyzx Road.
Gregory Rodriguez10 Gregory Rodriguez10 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2010
#27 ·
dustygardener4 said:๐Ÿ‘
๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™ ๐Ÿ™


๐Ÿ™‚

goldenhound32 said:Decendants, Bride of Chucky, The Ringer, Zzyzx Road.

Thanks. I was actually thinking more about her recent stuffโ€”Knocked Up, then there's The Ugly Truth and 27 Dresses, which feel like they're in that same vein. Plus all that messy drama on Grey's Anatomy. Ultimately, her characters in Knocked Up and The Ugly Truth are practically identical, and thatโ€™s my point.โ˜• ๐Ÿ™‚
goldenhound32 goldenhound32 Regular
335 messages
joined Mar 2024
#28 ·
Gregory Rodriguez10 said:๐Ÿ™‚

Thanks. I was actually thinking more about her recent stuffโ€”Knocked Up, then there's The Ugly Truth and 27 Dresses, which feel like they're in that same vein. Plus all that messy drama on Grey's Anatomy. Ultimately, her characters in Knocked Up and The Ugly Truth are practically identical, and thatโ€™s my point.โ˜• ๐Ÿ™‚

If I were sitting in the producerโ€™s chair, looking at a role that requires a specific kind of weight, Iโ€™d have to ask myself what kind of gamble Iโ€™m actually willing to take. Would I rather hand the keys to someone who has already proven they can carry a film on their shoulders, or would I risk everything on a newcomer just to see if there's lightning in a bottle? Honestly, my instinct leans toward the safe bet. There is a certain level of comfort in hiring talent that has already been vetted by the industryโ€”someone whose reliability and range aren't just theoretical. When you're dealing with millions of dollars in production costs and the livelihoods of hundreds of crew members, "potential" starts to feel like a very expensive luxury. I tend to favor the seasoned pro who knows how to hit their marks and deliver under pressure. That said, Iโ€™m not blind to the fact that playing it too safe can lead to mediocrity. If you only ever hire established names, you might miss out on that raw, transformative performance that defines a generation. But in my view, unless a newcomer has a spark that is absolutely undeniable, the risk of a lackluster performance often outweighs the thrill of discovery. Itโ€™s a calculated decision, but I've always found more value in stability than in chasing a roll of the dice.

As for Katherine Tice... I personally believe that taking on roles in movies like this won't prevent her from landing something more substantial down the roadโ€”provided she actually wants to. Itโ€™s much like how Robin Williams or Adam Sandler could pivot effortlessly into heavy hitters like *Insomnia* or *Punch-Drunk Love* whenever they felt the itch for something serious.
Gregory Rodriguez10 Gregory Rodriguez10 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2010
#29 ·
Iโ€™m calling it now: sheโ€™s the next Meg Ryan.๐Ÿ˜
rapidviper54 rapidviper54 Active Member
64 messages
joined Jul 2010
#30 ·
The movie is decent enough if you've got ninety minutes to kill...
Hannah Roberts Hannah Roberts Newcomer
8 messages
joined Aug 2007
#31 ·
Honestly, this might be one of the dumber comedies Iโ€™ve sat through lately. Itโ€™s the same old routine: Heigl's playing yet another stuck-up, high-maintenance victim who inevitably falls for the guy she supposedly can't stand at first glance.๐Ÿ™„Then there's that predictable ending where they make up in some public settingโ€”because apparently, if there aren't dozens of witnesses watching them, did the romance even happen? This whole thing feels about 80% recycled rom-com tropes. It tries way too hard to be witty, but instead, it just comes off as shallow and incredibly silly. I think I managed a single laugh, and that was only when she was dangling from a tree and the guy dropped his towel.๐Ÿ˜ณBut hey, if that's your kind of thing, go ahead and enjoy it.โ˜•
neonviper21 neonviper21 Newcomer
1 message
joined Dec 2009
#32 ·
Ugh, honestly! The second I saw this thread title, I knew exactly which movie we were talking about, but I spent way too much time trying to actually place it in my head first. I couldn't for the life of me remember it!! I think that alone says everything you need to know about this flick. Itโ€™s basically just mindless popcorn entertainment... which is pretty much the standard for movies in this tier. Gerard Butler is a solid actor, but this one isn't anything special for him. To be honest, I found myself watching him more than I was actually getting sucked into the plot. It was one of those "just passing through" kind of movies for me.
Sheโ€™s way too much and just kind of hits a wrong note, even though I really liked her back in Grey's Anatomy.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

๐Ÿ”— Similar threads