CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Out-of-pocket hospital costs without insurance: What to expect?

Out-of-pocket hospital costs without insurance: What to expect?

Started by Chloe Gomez6 · · 👁 10 views · 43 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Chloe Gomez6Thomas Jackson9cosmicmaker30Zachary Kern6Megan Rodriguez78Jeffrey Parker25Ronald Garcia5Arthur Ramirez7rapidcrane42goldencanyon12placidcanyon16analogviper2Susan Rodriguez4Casey Palmer5rowdytrucker13Jamie Martinez78wearycyclist18swiftpanther52Alex Walker8melloworca6Timothy Newman3Drew White26Dana Roberts4Melissa Sanchez8 …
rowdytrucker13 rowdytrucker13 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2010
#21 ·
Hi everyone...
Has anyone here gone through surgery for a deviated septum? If so, what did it end up costing you?
I’m scheduled for the procedure in about two weeks. I have supplemental insurance, but since it’s private and not through Medicare, it won't cover the hospital stay.
Every time I ask someone at the hospital, they just can't give me a straight answer on what the total bill will look like!!
I know there's a cap on the cost,$1000and that they don't charge extra based on how many days I stay—so whether I'm in for two days or sixteen doesn't change the base price—but still, nobody can even give me a ballpark figure. So, if any of you have had this done, please, please let me know what kind of damage I should expect to see on my credit card statement...🙂🙏
Jamie Martinez78 Jamie Martinez78 Newcomer
1 message
joined Apr 2011
#22 ·
So, look, I’ve just got my standard Medicare card, I'm currently out of work, and I don't have any extra supplemental insurance coverage
-I need to head in for surgery and stay at the hospital for about 10 days
so I'm trying to figure out how much this whole thing is gonna cost me since I don't have that extra coverage
it's for a nose surgery (mine is pretty deformed right now)
-I really wanna know what exactly Medicare covers and what kind of bill is gonna land on my doorstep
will I actually have to pay for the surgery itself, even though it's strictly for medical reasons
or is it just the hospital stay, or maybe just some small co-pay or whatever?
like, for someone like me without supplemental insurance, what's the daily rate for staying in a hospital bed
if anyone can give me the actual breakdown of costs
(honestly, I never bothered getting the extra insurance because I was healthy, plus I would've had to pay monthly regardless of being unemployed $27 because apparently I live with someone whose income is higher than the limit—I think it was around a thousand bucks or something, but who knows, doesn't matter)
wearycyclist18 wearycyclist18 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Apr 2011
#23 ·
rowdytrucker13 said:Hi everyone...
Has anyone here gone through surgery for a deviated septum? If so, what did it end up costing you?
I’m scheduled for the procedure in about two weeks. I have supplemental insurance, but since it’s private and not through Medicare, it won't cover the hospital stay.
Every time I ask someone at the hospital, they just can't give me a straight answer on what the total bill will look like!!
I know there's a cap on the cost,$1000and that they don't charge extra based on how many days I stay—so whether I'm in for two days or sixteen doesn't change the base price—but still, nobody can even give me a ballpark figure. So, if any of you have had this done, please, please let me know what kind of damage I should expect to see on my credit card statement...🙂🙏

Are you truly planning to undergo surgery for a deviated septum at a private clinic? I find myself wondering what the underlying motivation might be for such a decision. Is there a specific reason you would choose to pay out of pocket when you are fully entitled to have this procedure covered by Medicare?
swiftpanther52 swiftpanther52 Member
15 messages
joined Apr 2011
#24 ·
wearycyclist18 said:Are you truly planning to undergo surgery for a deviated septum at a private clinic? I find myself wondering what the underlying motivation might be for such a decision. Is there a specific reason you would choose to pay out of pocket when you are fully entitled to have this procedure covered by Medicare?

It’s not actually private; I just have supplemental insurance coverage.
wearycyclist18 wearycyclist18 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Apr 2011
#25 ·
swiftpanther52 said:It’s not actually private; I just have supplemental insurance coverage.


😁That is precisely what happens when one fails to read carefully. My apologies.
Alex Walker8 Alex Walker8 Member
12 messages
joined Mar 2011
#26 ·
What’s the typical out-of-pocket cost for shoulder surgery and a hospital stay if you're relying solely on Medicare?
Thanks in advance
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#27 ·
I think you just charge them the absolute maximum possible $1000.
Alex Walker8 Alex Walker8 Member
12 messages
joined Mar 2011
#28 ·
melloworca6 said:I think you just charge them the absolute maximum possible $1000.

Thanks for the quick reply.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#29 ·
And if you can swing it, just pay for supplemental insurance. It’ll be paid off in a month, and honestly, it's way cheaper to shell out $333 a year's worth of premiums than to deal with $1000 massive hospital bills (it all depends on how long you're stuck there and what they actually do to you).
Timothy Newman3 Timothy Newman3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2012
#30 ·
Speaking from my own experience, if you don't have supplemental insurance this year, the biggest hit you'll take is roughly $1000 for a single hospital stay—regardless of what they actually do or how many tests and surgeries are performed.
That’s the ceiling.
However, if you get discharged after just one day and then end up back in the hospital—whether it's for the same issue or something else entirely—that counts as a second stay. That could easily cost you another $3,000, or perhaps a bit less if the stay was shorter or involved fewer procedures (like a quick 2-3 day stint with some imaging, for instance).☕
p.s. You can download the PDF for the standard treatment fee schedule right here
Drew White26 Drew White26 Newcomer
1 message
joined Aug 2013
#31 ·
So, I just got told that they’re charging based on the diagnosis now instead of how many days you actually spend in a hospital bed, which is just great,
I mean, I literally just walked out of the hospital after being stuck there for seven whole days following an ER visit, and between the three different ultrasounds, all those various tests, and a mountain of antibiotics, I ended up coughing up $200 since I don't have any extra supplemental insurance coverage
Dana Roberts4 Dana Roberts4 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Oct 2013
#32 ·
melloworca6 said:And if you can swing it, just pay for supplemental insurance. It’ll be paid off in a month, and honestly, it's way cheaper to shell out $333 a year's worth of premiums than to deal with $1000 massive hospital bills (it all depends on how long you're stuck there and what they actually do to you).

I've been sitting on the fence about getting supplemental coverage forever, so this hits home. How exactly is paying the $333 yearly fee—every single year—cheaper than, God forbid, dropping $3,000 all at once? 🤔 I mean, who knows if I'll even make it through the next... what, 30 years? That feels like throwing money straight into a bonfire. And if things go south, my goodness, $1000 I'll just dip into my savings. I'd still come out ahead!
Anyway, everyone I know has this insurance, so clearly my math is broken. Please, someone, point out where I'm being an idiot!
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#33 ·
Maybe it’s because those $333 are set up on a 12-month payment plan. But when you actually get stuck in a hospital bed? From what I know, you're expected to cough up the cash right then and there—unless they decide to be nice and offer some kind of financing. And don't even get me started on the extra costs; you're constantly paying out of pocket for every single test and prescription. It adds up fast.

If you have the luxury of dropping $1000 all at once, good for you. For most people, that's just not an option. 🤷
Dana Roberts4 Dana Roberts4 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Oct 2013
#34 ·
Look, I’m just some average person in my thirties, so I’m definitely not out here constantly searching for symptoms... let alone popping pills. Plus, I like to think I’ve got enough discipline to just take whatever cash I’d be blowing on supplemental insurance over, say, three years, and stash it away—boom—$1000 ready if an emergency actually hits.
Is there any actual reason to pay for extra coverage besides avoiding that "$1000" situation? 🤔 Honestly, I've been wrestling with this for ages and still can't make a call that feels right...
Melissa Sanchez8 Melissa Sanchez8 Active Member
65 messages
joined Mar 2015
#35 ·
Dana Roberts4 said:Look, I’m just some average person in my thirties, so I’m definitely not out here constantly searching for symptoms... let alone popping pills. Plus, I like to think I’ve got enough discipline to just take whatever cash I’d be blowing on supplemental insurance over, say, three years, and stash it away—boom—$1000 ready if an emergency actually hits.
Is there any actual reason to pay for extra coverage besides avoiding that "$1000" situation? 🤔 Honestly, I've been wrestling with this for ages and still can't make a call that feels right...

If you're actually healthy, I don't see much point in paying for extra coverage either.
Especially if you're the type who actually has the discipline to stash cash away for emergencies. There are plenty of people out there who won't do that, or they'll just blow that money on something else the second things get tight.

On the flip side, the reason I keep paying for it is because some people are just reckless. If I were to have a major accident tomorrow—say, end up in surgery, spend a week at the 🤔 hospital, then move to trauma for two weeks (it could be longer or shorter, obviously)—not to mention all the tests in between (from the expensive ones to the cheap ones)... I highly doubt the total bill would be "only" $1000. If it were, our healthcare system would be incredibly cheap, and it wouldn't be surprising that it's falling apart.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#36 ·
Dana Roberts4 said:Look, I’m just some average person in my thirties, so I’m definitely not out here constantly searching for symptoms... let alone popping pills. Plus, I like to think I’ve got enough discipline to just take whatever cash I’d be blowing on supplemental insurance over, say, three years, and stash it away—boom—$1000 ready if an emergency actually hits.
Is there any actual reason to pay for extra coverage besides avoiding that "$1000" situation? 🤔 Honestly, I've been wrestling with this for ages and still can't make a call that feels right...

Listen, if you're healthy, if you're disciplined, and you can actually squirrel away enough cash to cover a potential hospital stay, then yeah, you don't need the extra insurance.

The problem is when an emergency hits and you don't have the coverage, and you don't have the cash either. That's why most people just pay for it.

And since when did young people stop getting sick or getting into accidents? 🤷 Actually, more and more young people around me are getting sick—and I mean seriously ill—so age really doesn't mean a thing.
Dana Roberts4 Dana Roberts4 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Oct 2013
#37 ·
Look, obviously young people get sick and suffer too, but you can't even put it in the same ballpark as the elderly. I don't think twice about paying up for my 82-year-old grandma... but for myself? 🤷 I've got $1000 tucked away and I'm just hoping for the best.
Edward Hall3 Edward Hall3 Member
12 messages
joined Nov 2009
#38 ·
$1000 is outdated information.
The maximum reimbursement amount for an insured individual without supplemental insurance per single claim is $667.

Look, if you don't have any ongoing health issues, paying for supplemental insurance is basically throwing money down the drain.
Just look at the annual math: you’d end up shelling out $520 if your salary exceeds $1703, yet you might never actually use the coverage.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#39 ·
So they actually lowered the number. Way to go, guys—at least there's one bit of good news. 🙂

I’ve been under the weather lately, so I haven't had supplemental insurance for about a year. But honestly? Once you start needing actual tests and scans, not having it is a total rip-off. For every kid, you're looking at $20, $30, $13, just adding up fast. Then again, I know plenty of people around here who are perfectly healthy and don't bother with extra coverage. They don't need it. 🤷

I'm just unlucky like that. When I don't have coverage, everything hits me at once. When I do have it, I don't seem to need it. 😁
Edward Hall3 Edward Hall3 Member
12 messages
joined Nov 2009
#40 ·
Sure, those out-of-pocket copays stack up fast if you don't have supplemental insurance while using medical services. But you really need to look at your total annual spending. That’s the only way to see if paying for extra coverage actually makes financial sense.

And let's not forget that certain medical categories aren't even covered by supplemental plans—things like workers' comp claims, pregnancy-related testing, and so on.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads