Gary Palmer8 said:Man, you really are deep in that hateful rabbit hole regarding Hamilton, aren't you?
People have already been telling you that Hamilton lost his fourth gear... and honestly, once he clocked that remaining time, he actually beat Heikki—who basically just finished his lap after crossing the line one more time.
Maybe try learning how to count, LOL
Where exactly in my post do you see any racism? 🙄
Here’s the link for you:
http://www.formula1.com/results/season/2009/805/6602/ 😉
Kovalainen's Q1 was 1:26.184, Hamilton was 1:26.454. Even in Q1, Kovalainen was 0.300 faster than Hamilton when his car was actually working normally. 😉
I know people will hate this, but Kovalainen might actually keep up with Lewis regularly this year. I don't hate Hamilton at all, but they've turned him into this ultra-superstar without any actual foundation. We'll see what kind of driver he really is once McLaren hits a rough patch this year. ☕
Maybe he's actually good, I don't know—we haven't had the chance to see it yet. If he finishes on the podium today without 10 or 15 cars dropping out, then okay, maybe he's legit. ☕
With the best car and the whole McLaren crew behind him, it would be weird if he wasn't fighting for the title.
Vettel is way better than Hamilton and doesn't have to push nearly as hard to get results. Seriously, think about it—which other driver can take a junk car and bring it to 1st place in a normal race where the favorites don't just break down, especially in his first full season? 👍
And don't even get me started on Button and Barrichello. Everyone used to clown them, asking why two nobodies who couldn't drive were even in F1. And now look, they're sitting at 1-2. Did they suddenly become phenomenal overnight, or did the quality of the car play a role?