Joseph Lee3
Active Member
113 messages
joined May 2005
Good grief, did nobody even mention "That Obscure Object of Desire"? 🙂
I have to say, Bunuel earns my skeptical eyebrow raise because he spent most of his career basically trolling his own audience. He’d think one thing, shoot something else, and then hand the public a complete bait-and-switch. The man was a total con artist—though I suppose that’s just part of the surrealist charm, isn't it? A little bit of smoke and mirrors to make sure you end up projecting your own intentions onto the screen.
Take that movie mentioned above, for example: you've got two different actresses systematically playing the exact same female lead. Then there's the male lead wandering around randomly carrying a burlap sack. Or the dwarf playing a psychiatrist... I could go on. And just when you think you've finally cracked the code and pieced together why everything is happening, you read somewhere that he actually never had any hidden agenda or deep symbolic motive at all. When faced with a question about his heavy-handed symbolism, he just plays coy, like a fox hiding in a thicket, acting as if he has no idea what anyone is talking about. 😎
Anyway, I absolutely love Angel of Destruction and Beauty Day. I'm just not a huge fan of Bunuelian destructive cinematography, especially in that first one.