#1 ·
Honestly, they’re living up to their name, if nothing else... 😢
http://www.forzaminardi.com/petition/petition.php
http://www.forzaminardi.com/petition/petition.php
Started by Chris Barrett37 · · 👁 4 views · 16 replies
rustystag7 said:I’m signing on that too!!
But I actually want to get your esteemed opinions here because I found myself in a heated argument with a friend just the other day...
He’s insisting—and honestly, he’s being a total idiot—that since this is basically a rebranded Haas, they’re going to be stuck with the same engines while just swapping out the chassis. His logic is that nobody is going to bother investing heavily in them since they won't be the top-tier outfit like Oracle, which will always be the priority. He thinks the current Haas setup is essentially just going to serve as a glorified testing platform and won't offer any real improvement over what we see now.
My take, however, is that while the engine might stay the same, the chassis development isn't some impossible philosophical hurdle; they’ll run tests, iterate, and roll out new upgrades across all four cars on the grid consistently.
What do you guys think?
Personally, if Ferrari had been the one to pick up Haas, I would have been thrilled. Their engines are decent—even if they can be temperamental—and they could pair them with two solid drivers capable of fighting for a spot in the top ten. I’m talking about someone like De Rosi first, and then maybe Wurz as a follow-up.
redheron12 said:man, screw Haas... seriously, just let them vanish... is there even a petition out there to strike the Haas name from the record books?
rustystag7 said:I’m definitely on board with this!!
But I’d love to get your collective take on something, mainly because I found myself in quite a heated debate with a friend the other day...
He’s insisting—and honestly, I think he's being a bit thick here—that since the new Haas setup will essentially function like the old Minardi, they'll just stick to the same engines and a different chassis. His logic is that they won't bother investing heavily because the Oracle team will always be the top priority. He's basically arguing that the secondary car will just be a glorified development tool and won't be much of an upgrade over what we've seen from the bottom tier lately.
My take? I think it's more straightforward than that. They'll likely use the same engines and chassis architecture, but there isn't some grand, complicated philosophy at play; they'll test, develop, and eventually roll out new upgrades across all four cars on the grid. It's just how progress works, right?
What do you all think?
For what it's worth, I actually think it would have been great if Ferrari had picked up the reins instead. Their engines are solid—even if they aren't the most reliable—and they could have paired them with two high-caliber drivers capable of fighting for a top ten spot. I’m thinking someone like Alonso first, and then maybe Wurz.
mistybear87 said:That’s nonsense. We're going to have two nearly identical Oracle teams; it's clearly in their best interest to double their presence and get twice the coverage.😉
rustystag7 said:If that's the case, honestly, it’s probably for the best that McLaren is gone. We’ll end up with two much faster cars on the track that actually finish races instead of breaking down every five minutes. It just makes F1 way more fun to watch.