CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › The Descent

The Descent

Started by Carl Cruz · · 👁 8 views · 203 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Carl CruzJose Chase2cosmictrucker132Lawrence Booth2cosmicraven2Daniel Wells4Rebecca Myers38Ethan Perez97Carl Torres3Olivia Hill3Roger Allen3Daniel Bishop4darkmaker94Drew Wright5boldscout72darkviper7David Price5Abrightstag9rowdybadger41vividorca5wearygardener13Samuel Smith5Chloe Patel36 …
vividtrucker10 vividtrucker10 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Aug 2009
#201 ·
This movie is pure genius 🙏
A sequel would kill, but that ending is a total insult to anyone with half a brain 🙄
Frank Castillo Frank Castillo Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2018
#202 ·
I watched it too. Honestly, the ending was total garbage. It turned into this revenge killing plot that had absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the story. After everything those characters went through surviving in that cave—all those monsters, the trauma, losing their friends—there's no way they'd be distracted by some petty, earthly drama like a love triangle... I guess the main protagonist (who, if you ask me, was just a pure antagonistica, a dirty, selfish, and heartless b...h) didn't experience enough actual trauma to realize what truly matters in life. And Juno wasn't a b...h at all. She had her flaws, sure, just like everyone else, but while she was down there with the crew, everything she did was done with their best interests in mind.
Because of how it ended, the whole movie feels ruined to me, so I can't give it more than a 5/10. It feels like the director was probably blindsided by a lover or something, so he decided to settle the score with his "enemy" on screen. To him, apparently, the fact that Juno had an affair with > husband was a much bigger crime than the fact that she totally screwed the entire crew right at the start by luring them into an unexplored cave just to make a name for herself. It felt like a Mexican soap opera where two foolish w...es are just fighting over a man. I can't believe a respected horror filmmaker would allow that level of writing.
Pathetic. 👎
Frank Castillo Frank Castillo Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2018
#203 ·
So, I just finished watching the second one. Thank God, my blood pressure actually stayed a bit lower after that compared to the first. I guess that damn Sarah isn't a total piece of work after all. It was nice to finally see her act somewhat normally, and honestly, I’m glad she ended up being decent food for them. 🤣
The sequel is way better, though there's blood everywhere. I'd give the story and the effects an 8/10. It lacks solid acting, which seems to be a common issue with movies made after the year 2000, but eh, I'll give Sarah a passing grade, and Juno too. As for the rest of the cast... well, let's just leave it at that. 🙂
And yeah, those beasts and their "miraculous" evolution and how they feed 1.2 miles underground just doesn't make any sense at all, but whatever. It's easy enough to just switch off your brain and enjoy the good old bloodshed. *thumbs up*
Drew Long76 Drew Long76 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Feb 2019
#204 ·
Dennis Brown2 said:A lot of people seem to miss a very fundamental point here. These "creatures" actually evolved from humanoids, so you could arguably view them as a divergent branch of humanity, specifically adapted to the exact conditions depicted in the movie. They've likely spent tens of thousands of years evolving into what they are now: perfectly suited for life in total darkness. Much like bats, they are essentially blind, relying instead on highly developed hearing and sensory organs—which explains those massive ears—to detect solid objects and the movement of living beings for hunting. They probably even make short excursions out to the immediate vicinity of the cave entrance to hunt.

Their way of life has made them incredibly agile and fast. BUT... they don't actually possess any superhuman strength. Their diet in those conditions, combined with the lack of light (and presumably sunlight/calcium), has left them relatively fragile. Aside from their speed, agility, and those extremely dangerous jaws, they don't have massive physical power; that is why, if the lighting is good and they are forced into a head-on confrontation, they can be defeated individually.
When they feed, they instinctively go straight for the stomach and soft tissues—it's a pure craving for protein.
They are portrayed exactly as these humanoids would be if they truly existed.
In the end, only two women really went toe-to-toe with them; the others were mostly gripped by hysteria and panic. Granted, the girls did have tools—picks and axes—at their disposal.
But the interior of that mountain is their home turf, so logically, the women didn't stand a chance. That's just how it ends.
Everything is brilliantly and logically executed. Perhaps it wouldn't have hurt if they had shown female crawlers or children as well, just to add variety.
Regardless, this is definitely one of those rare horror films that I genuinely enjoyed, and based on what I've seen on the Net, it has grown into a total cult classic.
As for a sequel, it seems like a bit of a non-starter to me, because it feels like an artificial extension of a story that was already perfectly concluded and wrapped up. But hey, we'll see. Don't go expecting anything special.

This is such a good explanation. I feel an immediate urge to watch it again after all these years. 👍👍👍🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads