#81 ·
ljutika said:Here's the link:
http://food.com/en/vegetables/potato.htm
I think these charts look fine to me.
Started by Grace Baker2 · · 👁 7 views · 94 replies
ljutika said:Here's the link:
http://food.com/en/vegetables/potato.htm
Joseph Jones85 said:1. For a chart like this to actually mean anything, you’d need to specify the exact variety of potato being used. I'm fairly certain nutrient density varies significantly from one cultivar to the next.
2. And—perhaps most importantly— at what specific stage were these measurements taken? Are we talking about raw potatoes? If so, was that immediately after harvest, or after they sat in storage for a few days? Because if they've been sitting around, the profile changes. Or are we looking at processed data?
3. Personally, I think providing data for a raw food that isn't even safe to eat raw is pretty pointless.
4. To be blunt, I find charts like these incredibly unreliable. Honestly, anyone with even a basic grasp of measurement standards would probably agree with me.
Kenneth Hernandez67 said:Just grab whatever works best for you 🙂 even if it’s just from DM.
Casey Palmer5 said:The best way to play defense is just staying out of the sun as much as possible and actually using sunscreen with decent SPF... And don't even get me started on smoking—that's absolute poison for your skin.
Amanda Cruz68 said:I know exactly what you meant, 😉 so don't sweat it. Remember when I suggested it to you back on the old forum over on Reddit? 🙂