CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 (2015)

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 (2015)

Started by slycanyon55 · · 👁 6 views · 45 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants slycanyon55Jessica Jones9granitemason4cosmicheron21Drew Sanchez82Emily Garcia3nimblemarlin6Samuel Brooks3Eric Hayes61mellowsurfer9James Jackson9Harold Evans4Mark Walker97Jacob Diaz6Dana Walker2redotter5Maria James94goldengardener51briskhound2Aaron Ward6slytinker82Robin Fox2Daniel Kelly57silvergardener6 …
Maria James94 Maria James94 Member
39 messages
joined May 2009
#21 ·
A bit of a lukewarm sequel, and honestly, a pretty underwhelming way to wrap up the series. I was definitely expecting more from this.
goldengardener51 goldengardener51 Member
43 messages
joined Nov 2012
#22 ·
I recall thinking the third book was my absolute favorite—though I suppose that logic applies to the movie as well. It feels incredibly overextended, honestly... just dragging on far longer than necessary. Everything vital that happens in the film could easily be condensed into a single hour.
briskhound2 briskhound2 Regular
411 messages
joined Mar 2009
#23 ·
It’s dragging on forever—honestly, it feels like it could go on until the heat death of the universe—but there's absolutely zero substance to it... nothing interesting happening at all.
Aaron Ward6 Aaron Ward6 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Mar 2016
#24 ·
This movie really shouldn't have dragged on for more than 55 minutes... what an absolute slog. And just when I finally thought it was over, the screen went pitch black... I found myself thinking, thank God, once that final knockout scene with the kids actually happened 😁
When I look back at the first film and how much I stood against the system, by the end, they had me wanting nothing more than for Snow to be completely wiped out...
What kind of scenes are we even talking about? There's four minutes of Jennifer walking through that house, stepping out, stepping back in, then bumping into that idiot who says, "I picked up some wildflowers at the edge of the woods," if those were even wildflowers... and that entire sequence takes up seven minutes of the runtime...
She really should have just used that little trolley on the kids image
Jessica Jones9 Jessica Jones9 Member
21 messages
joined Dec 2015
#25 ·
What's wrong with Josh 😍 🙂?
slytinker82 slytinker82 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jan 2009
#26 ·
Man, I was counting down the minutes until this thing ended. It felt so dragged out... honestly, if they'd just cut it down to two hours, the tension would've been way better.
Robin Fox2 Robin Fox2 Regular
523 messages
joined Apr 2016
#27 ·
Who actually filmed this, who bankrolled this entire production, and most importantly—who on earth benefits from it? It’s just a mindless flick serving as the grand finale to an equally pointless series. They spend the whole time sprinting through the streets while traps trigger behind them... And people call this a hit book? Give me a break. 😕
Daniel Kelly57 Daniel Kelly57 Active Member
228 messages
joined Sep 2016
#28 ·
That was a terrifying cinematic experience. What kind of ending was that? What am I even supposed to take away from this? 😵
silvergardener6 silvergardener6 Member
49 messages
joined Feb 2014
#29 ·
I have to say, I find myself agreeing with the general consensus forming here. It feels like a painfully mediocre movie that essentially gutted the franchise by splitting it into Part 1 and Part 2; it seems such a shame because the first installment was actually quite refreshing, earning praise from critics as a breath of fresh air among YA series, and the second film set an incredibly high bar for what future YA adaptations could achieve.
Karen Smith9 Karen Smith9 Active Member
183 messages
joined Apr 2013
#30 ·
Honestly, when I see the crowd showing up at the local library to check out books—mostly just teenagers, with the age limit capped at 16—it gives me a pretty good idea of what kind of movie we're dealing with here.
rowdyotter12 rowdyotter12 Member
48 messages
joined Jul 2020
#31 ·
Karen Smith9 said:Honestly, when I see the crowd showing up at the local library to check out books—mostly just teenagers, with the age limit capped at 16—it gives me a pretty good idea of what kind of movie we're dealing with here.

The film—much like the book—is clearly aimed squarely at that demographic, and honestly, I don't see the issue with that. Teens seem to love
- Great, which is exactly why they decided to split it into two parts just to squeeze more cash out of us. It really highlights how much this whole thing is driven by the bottom line,
since they could have easily wrapped everything up in one single installment and been done with it.

That said, it isn't exactly worth a theater ticket, so I intentionally skipped the cinema trip.
The teenagers who think this stuff is "WOW" will go make it a hit. Those of us a bit older will probably grumble about how bloated and overextended it feels
- Which, let's be honest, it is—but we'll likely end up watching it anyway, just to see the saga through to its conclusion. Maybe someone will catch it on TV late at night and fall asleep halfway through. 😁
c'est la vie

I did enjoy the ending, though—those last thirty minutes were decent.
It probably didn't even need an epilogue, but hey, whatever.
rustywalker1 rustywalker1 Active Member
89 messages
joined Jun 2011
#32 ·
The first two movies were actually decent.
As for the last two, they could have easily been wrapped up in 90 minutes—and even then, they probably would’ve felt dragged out. 😵
frozenwolf25 frozenwolf25 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2016
#33 ·
Splitting movies is just a lazy gimmick to me—if you have one book, you don't need two or three films to tell the story. Honestly, when they first announced splitting the third book, I thought it was absurd; I couldn't fathom how they’d stretch the plot without it feeling thin. But you all pretty much nailed that sentiment already. ☕ You actually reminded me that I somehow missed seeing it in theaters, so I really should catch up. 😬
brightheron64 brightheron64 Regular
408 messages
joined Apr 2016
#34 ·
rustywalker1 said:The first two movies were actually decent.
As for the last two, they could have easily been wrapped up in 90 minutes—and even then, they probably would’ve felt dragged out. 😵


I actually watched Mockingjay - Part 1 and Part 2 back-to-back in one go...🙄 🙂

Thank God for the fast-forward button. 🙏
Carl Cox3 Carl Cox3 Active Member
77 messages
joined Dec 2020
#35 ·
Predictable from the opening scene to the final credits. I loved the first two films, but the last two were absolute garbage. They really should have just combined them into one. Am I glad I skipped the theater? I am.
frozenwolf25 frozenwolf25 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2016
#36 ·
They really shouldn't have butchered the final installment. Based on the book, I honestly expected the adaptation to be a quick watch—but then again... 🤦 I can stomach the first one well enough, but the second? It’s bordering on unbearable.
Jesse Anderson2 Jesse Anderson2 Member
29 messages
joined Sep 2017
#37 ·
Five minutes of actual plot, fifteen minutes of just stalling... that was basically this whole movie.

Sent from my iPhone 6s via Reddit
Jessica Jones9 Jessica Jones9 Member
21 messages
joined Dec 2015
#38 ·
Carl Cox3 said:Predictable from the opening scene to the final credits. I loved the first two films, but the last two were absolute garbage. They really should have just combined them into one. Am I glad I skipped the theater? I am.

That's exactly how I feel. 👏
Grace Ramos Grace Ramos Member
45 messages
joined Jul 2013
#39 ·
The first and last ones work for me; everything else is just too hard to swallow.
Jessica Jones9 Jessica Jones9 Member
21 messages
joined Dec 2015
#40 ·
Just finished watching
Total flop. 👎

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads